Page 63 - IJB-7-1
P. 63

Sherborne and Claeyssens
           Conflicts of interest                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104866

           No conflicts of interest were reported by all authors.  12.  Gralton  J,  Tovey  E,  McLaws  ML,  et al.,  2011,  The  Role
                                                                   of  Particle  Size  in  Aerosolised  Pathogen  Transmission:  A
           References                                              Review. J Infect, 62:1–13.

                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2010.11.010
           1.   Joshi SC, Sheikh AA, 2015, 3D printing in aerospace and its   13.  Wang CS, Otani Y, 2013, Removal of Nanoparticles from Gas
               long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototyping, 10:175–85.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1111519       Streams by Fibrous Filters: A Review. Ind Eng Chem Res,
                                                                   52:5–17.
           2.   Conner  BP,  Manogharan  GP,  Martof  AN,  et  al.,  2014,      https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300574m
               Making Sense of 3-D Printing: Creating a Map of Additive   14.  Grinshpun SA, Yermakov M, Khodoun M, 2020, Autoclave
               Manufacturing Products and Services. Addit Manuf, 1:64–76.  Sterilization  and Ethanol  Treatment of Re-used Surgical
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005         Masks and N95 Respirators During COVID-19: Impact on
           3.   Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print me an organ? Why   Their Performance and Integrity. J Hosp Infect, 105:608–14.
               we are not there yet. Progress Polymer Sci, 97:101145.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.030
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145  15.  Rengasamy S, Eimer BC, Shaffer RE, 2009, Comparison of
           4.   Tino R, Moore R, Antoline S, et al., 2020, COVID-19 and the   Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of NIOSH-approved and
               Role of 3D Printing in Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Germany.  CE-marked Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Ann
           5.   Celik  HK,  Kose  O,  Ulmeanu  ME,  et al.,  2020,  Design   Occup Hyg, 53:117–28.
               and Additive  Manufacturing  of a Medical  Face Shield for      https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men086
               Healthcare Workers Battling Coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J   16.  Grinshpun  SA,  Haruta  H,  Eninger  RM,  et al.,  2009,
               Bioprint, 6:286.                                    Performance of an N95 Filtering Facepiece  Particulate
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i4.286               Respirator  and  a  Surgical  Mask  During  Human  Breathing:
           6.   Cook TM, 2020, Personal protective equipment during the   Two Pathways for Particle Penetration. J Occup Environ Hyg,
               coronavirus  disease  (COVID)  2019  pandemic-a  narrative   6:593–603.
               review. Anaesthesia, 75:920–7.                      https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620903120086
               https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15071              17.  Cai M, Li H, Shen S, et al., 2018, Customized Design and
           7.   Public  Health  England,  2020,  COVID-19:  Infection   3D  Printing  of  Face  Seal  for  an  N95  Filtering  Facepiece
               Prevention  and  Control  Guidance.  Public  Health  England,   Respirator. J Occup Environ Hyg, 15:226–34.
               United Kingdom, England.                            https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1411598
           8.   Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X,  et al.,  2020,  Epidemiological   18.  Swennen  GR,  Pottel  L,  Haers  PE,  2020,  Custom-made
               and  Clinical  Characteristics  of  99  Cases  of  2019  Novel   3D-printed Face Masks in Case of Pandemic Crisis Situations
               Coronavirus  Pneumonia  in  Wuhan,  China:  A  Descriptive   with a Lack of Commercially Available FFP2/3 Masks. Int J
               Study. Lancet, 395:507–13.                          Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49:673-7.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30211-7       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.015
           9.   World Health Organization, 2020, Rational Use of Personal   19.  British  Standards  Institution,  2011,  149:  2001+  A1:  2009
               Protective  Equipment  (PPE)  for  Coronavirus  Disease   Respiratory  Protective  Devices.  Filtering  Half  Masks  to
               (COVID-19): Interim Guidance. World Health Organization,   Protect  against  Particles.  Requirements,  Testing,  Marking.
               Geneva, Switzerland.                                British Standards Institution, London, UK.
           10.  Cheng VC, Wong SC, Chuang VW, et al., 2020, The Role      https://doi.org/10.3403/02279488
               of Community-wide Wearing of Face Mask for Control of   20.  Gawn J, Clayton M, Makison C, et al., 2008, Evaluating the
               Coronavirus  Disease  2019  (COVID-19)  Epidemic  Due  to   Protection  Afforded  by  Surgical  Masks  Against  Influenza
               SARS-CoV-2. J Infect, 81:107–14.                    Bioaerosols: Gross Protection of Surgical Masks Compared
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024          to Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Health Safety Exec,2020.
           11.  Vuorinen  V, Aarnio  M, Alava  M,  et  al.,  2020,  Modelling   Available from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr619.
               Aerosol  Transport and  Virus Exposure with Numerical   pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 01].
               Simulations  in  Relation  to  SARS-CoV-2  Transmission  by   21.  Lee  SA,  Hwang  DC,  Li  HY,  et al.,  2016,  Particle  Size-
               Inhalation Indoors. Saf Sci, 130:104866.            selective Assessment of Protection of European Standard FFP

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1        59
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68