Page 67 - IJB-7-1
P. 67

Sherborne and Claeyssens
           88.  McDonnell  G,  Russell  AD,  1999,  Antiseptics  and   99.  Sherborne C, Owen R, Reilly GC, et al., 2018, Light-based
               Disinfectants:  Activity,  Action,  and  Resistance.  Clin   Additive  Manufacturing  of  PolyHIPEs:  Controlling  the
               Microbiol Rev, 12:147–79.                           Surface  Porosity  for  3D  Cell  Culture  Applications.  Mater
               https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.12.1.147                Design, 156:494–503.
           89.  McGann  CL,  Streifel  BC,  Lundin  JG,  et al.,  2017,      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.061
               Multifunctional  polyHIPE  Wound  Dressings  for  the   100.  Huan  S,  Mattos  BD,  Ajdary  R,  et  al.,  2019,  Two-
               Treatment of Severe Limb Trauma. Polymer, 126:408–18.  phase  Emulgels  for  Direct  Ink  Writing  of  Skin-Bearing
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.067       Architectures. Adv Function Mater, 29:1902990.
           90.  Dikici BA, Dikici S, Reilly GC, et al., 2019, A Novel Bilayer      https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201902990
               Polycaprolactone Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration:   101.  Sušec M, Ligon SC, Stampfl J, et al., 2013, Hierarchically
               Combining  Electrospinning  and Emulsion  Templating.   Porous Materials from Layer-by-layer Photopolymerization
               Materials, 12:2643.                                 of High Internal Phase Emulsions. Macromol Rapid Commun,
               https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162643                  34:938–43.
           91.  Gui  H,  Zhang  T,  Ji  S,  et al.,  2020,  Nanofibrous,  Porous      https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201300016
               Monoliths  Formed  from  Gelating  High  Internal  Phase   102.  Rezanavaz  R,  2018,  3D  Printing  of  Porous  Polymeric
               Emulsions Using Syndiotactic  Polystyrene.  Polymer,   Materials for Stationary Phases of Chromatography Columns.
               2020:122708.                                        UC Library, California.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122708   103.  Cooperstein  I,  Layani  M,  Magdassi  S,  2015,  3D  Printing
           92.  Johnson  DW,  Sherborne  C,  Didsbury  MP,  et al.,  2013,   of  Porous  Structures  by  UV-Curable  O/W  Emulsion  for
               Macrostructuring  of Emulsion-templated  Porous Polymers   Fabrication of Conductive Objects. J Mater Chem C, 3:2040–4.
               by 3D Laser Patterning. Adv Mater, 25:3178–81.      https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tc02215g
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300552          104.  Wenger L, Radtke CP, Göpper J, et al., 2020, 3D-printable
           93.  Sears  NA,  Dhavalikar  PS,  Cosgriff-Hernandez  EM,  2016,   and  Enzymatically  Active  Composite  Materials  Based  on
               Emulsion Inks for 3D Printing of High Porosity Materials.   Hydrogel-filled High Internal Phase Emulsions. Front Bioeng
               Macromol Rapid Commun, 37:1369–74.                  Biotechnol, 8:713.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201600236              https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00713
           94.  Sears N, Dhavalikar P, Whitely M, et al., 2017, Fabrication   105.  Sears NA, Wilems TS, Gold KA, et al., 2019, Hydrocolloid
               of Biomimetic Bone Grafts with Multi-material 3D Printing.   Inks for 3D Printing of Porous Hydrogels. Adv Mater Technol,
               Biofabrication, 9:025020.                           4:1800343.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7077            https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800343
           95.  Welch CF, Rose GD, Malotky D, et al., 2006, Rheology of   106.  Minas C, Carnelli D, Tervoort E, et al., 2016, 3D Printing
               High Internal Phase Emulsions. Langmuir, 22:1544–50.  of Emulsions and Foams into Hierarchical Porous Ceramics.
               https://doi.org/10.1021/la052207h                   Adv Mater, 28:9993–9.
           96.  Stansbury  JW,  Idacavage  MJ,  2016,  3D  Printing  with      https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603390
               Polymers:  Challenges  Among  Expanding  Options  and   107.  Alison L, Menasce S, Bouville F, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of
               Opportunities. Dent Mater, 32:54–64.                Sacrificial Templates into Hierarchical Porous Materials. Sci
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018        Rep, 9:1–9.
           97.  Malayeri  A,  Sherborne  C,  Paterson  T,  et al.,  2016,      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36789-z
               Osteosarcoma  Growth  on  Trabecular  Bone  Mimicking   108.  Jiang  H,  Sheng  Y,  Ngai  T,  2020,  Pickering  Emulsions:
               Structures  Manufactured  Via  Laser  Direct  Write.  Int J   Versatility  of Colloidal  Particles  and Recent  Applications.
               Bioprint, 2:67–77.                                  Curr Opin Coll Int Sci, 49:1–15.
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2016.02.005            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2020.04.010
           98.  Wang AJ, Paterson T, Owen R, et al., 2016, Photocurable High   109.  Liu  J,  Wang  P,  He  Y,  et al.,  2019,  Polymerizable
               Internal Phase Emulsions (HIPEs) Containing Hydroxyapatite   Nonconventional  Gel  Emulsions  and  Their  Utilization  in
               for Additive  Manufacture  of  Tissue Engineering  Scaffolds   the  Template  Preparation  of  Low-density,  High-strength
               with Multi-scale Porosity. Mater Sci Eng C, 67:51–8.  Polymeric  Monoliths  and  3D  Printing.  Macromolecules,
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.087          52:2456–63.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1        63
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72