Page 43 - IJB-7-2

Zhang, et al.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.056.
65. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D, 2005, Porosity of 3D Biomaterial 76. Lin AS, Barrows TH, Cartmell SH, et al., 2003,
Scaffolds and Osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 26:5474–91. Microarchitectural and Mechanical Characterization of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. Oriented Porous Polymer Scaffolds. Biomaterials, 24:481–9.
66. Zhang LC, Chen LY, Wang L, 2020, Surface Modification of https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00361-7.
Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Technologies, Developments, 77. Chang BS, Lee CK, Hong KS, et al., 2000, Osteoconduction
and Future Interests. Adv Eng Mater, 22:1901258. at Porous Hydroxyapatite with Various Pore Configurations.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201901258. Biomaterials, 21:1291–8.
67. Wang Q, Zhou P, Liu S, et al., 2020, Multi-Scale Surface https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00030-2.
Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: 78. Yla HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, et al., 2001, Pore Diameter
A Review. Nanomaterials, 10:1244. of More Than 100 μm is Not Requisite for Bone Ingrowth in
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061244. Rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res, 58:679–83.
68. Liu J, Liu J, Attarilar S, et al., 2020, Nano-Modified Titanium https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1069.
Implant Materials: A Way Toward Improved Antibacterial 79. Gotz HE, Muller M, Emmel A, et al., 2004, Effect of Surface
Properties. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8:576969. Finish on the Osseointegration of Laser-Treated Titanium
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.576969. Alloy Implants. Biomaterials, 25:4057–64.
69. Lee YH, Bhattarai G, Park IS, et al., 2013, Bone Regeneration https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.002.
Around N-Acetyl Cysteine-Loaded Nanotube Titanium 80. Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, et al., 2016,
Dental Implant in Rat Mandible. Biomaterials, 34:10199–208. Effect of Pore Size on Bone Ingrowth Into Porous Titanium
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.080. Implants Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing: An In Vivo
70. Zheng C, Attarilar S, Li K, et al., 2021, 3D-Printed HA15- Experiment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 59:690–701.
Loaded β-Tricalcium Phosphate/Poly (Lactic-co-glycolic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069.
Acid) Bone Tissue Scaffold Promotes Bone Regeneration in 81. Wang J, Bai F, Wang Z, et al., 2010, The Correlation Between
Rabbit Radial Defects. Int J Bioprint, 7:317. the Internal Structure and Vascularization of Controllable
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i1.317. Porous Bioceramic materials In Vivo: A Quantitative Study.
71. van Bael S, Vandenbroucke B, Kerckhofs G, et al., 2009, Tissue Eng Part A, 16:12.
Design and Production of Bone Scaffolds with Selective https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0148.
Laser Melting. In: TMS 2009 138 Annual Meeting and 82. Knychala J, Bouropoulos N, Catt CJ, et al., 2013, Pore
th
Exhibition, pp. 333–9. Available from: https://www.lirias. Geometry Regulates Early Stage Human Bone Marrow
kuleuven.be/318239?limo=0. Cell Tissue Formation and Organisation. Ann Biomed Eng,
72. van Bael S, Chai Y C, Truscello S, et al., 2012, The Effect of 41:917–30.
Pore Geometry on the In Vitro Biological Behavior of Human https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0748-z.
Periosteum-Derived Cells Seeded on Selective Laser-Melted 83. Bai Y, Chaudhari A, Wang H, 2020, Investigation on the
Ti6Al4V Bone Scaffolds. Acta Biomater, 8:2824–34. Microstructure and Machinability of ASTM A131 Steel
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001. Manufactured by Directed Energy Deposition. J Mater
73. Rumpler M, Woesz A, Dunlop JWC, et al., 2008, The Effect Process Technol, 276:116410.
of Geometry on Three-Dimensional Tissue Growth. J R Soc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116410.
Interface, 5:1173–80. 84. Joly P, Duda GN, Schöne M, et al., 2013, Geometry-Driven
74. Li X, Tan YH, Wang P, et al., 2020, Metallic Microlattice and Cell Organization Determines Tissue Growths in Scaffold
Epoxy Interpenetrating Phase Composites: Experimental and Pores: Consequences for Fibronectin Organization. PLoS
Simulation Studies on Superior Mechanical Properties and One, 8:e73545.
Their Mechanisms. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf, 135:105934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073545.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105934. 85. Hu Y, Grainger DW, Winn SR, et al., 2010, Fabrication of
75. Wang P, Li X, Luo S, et al., 2021, Additively Manufactured Poly (Alpha-Hydroxy Acid) foam Scaffolds Using Multiple
Heterogeneously Porous Metallic Bone with Biostructural Solvent Systems. J Biomed Mater Res, 59:563–72.
Functions and Bone-Like Mechanical Properties. J Mater Sci https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1269.
Technol, 62:173–9. 86. Jones AC, Arns CH, Hutmacher DW, et al., 2009, The

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2 39