Page 44 - IJB-7-2

Additively Manufactured NiTi Implants
Correlation of Pore Morphology, Interconnectivity and 96. Barou O, Mekraldi S, Vico L, et al., 2002, Relationships
Physical Properties of 3D Ceramic Scaffolds with Bone Between Trabecular Bone Remodeling and Bone
Ingrowth. Biomaterials, 30:1440–51. Vascularization: A Quantitative Study. Bone, 30:604–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.056. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00677-4.
87. Wen P, Jauer L, Voshage M, et al., 2018, Densification 97. Chu CL, Chung CY, Lin PH, et al., 2004, Fabrication of
Behavior of Pure Zn Metal Parts Produced by Selective Laser Porous NiTi Shape Memory Alloy for Hard Tissue Implants
Melting for Manufacturing Biodegradable Implants. J Mater by Combustion Synthesis. Mater Sci Eng A Struct, 366:114–
Process Technol, 258:128–37. 9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.118.
88. Zheng J, Chen L, Chen D, et al., 2019, Effects of Pore Size 98. van Oers RF, Ruimerman R, van Rietbergen B, et al., 2008,
and Porosity of Surface-Modified Porous Titanium Implants Relating Osteon Diameter to Strain. Bone, 43:476–82.
on Bone Tissue Ingrowth. Trans Nonferr Metals Soc, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.015.
29:2534–45. 99. Tan XP, Tan YJ, Chow CS, et al., 2017, Metallic
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(19)65161-7. Powder-Bed Based 3D Printing of Cellular Scaffolds
89. Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Matsushita T, et al., 2005, for Orthopaedic Implants: A State-of-the-Art Review on
Mechanical Properties and Osteoconductivity of Porous Manufacturing, Topological Design, Mechanical Properties
Bioactive Titanium. Biomaterials, 26:6014–23. and Biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.019. 76:1328–43.
90. Dong XN, Guo XE, 2004, The Dependence of Transversely https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094.
Isotropic Elasticity of Human Femoral Cortical Bone on 100. Soro N, Attar H, Wu X, et al., 2019, Investigation of
Porosity. J Biomech, 37:1281–7. the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Additively
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.011. Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Biomedical Scaffolds Designed
91. Abidi IH, Khalid FA, Farooq MU, et al., 2015, Tailoring with a Schwartz Primitive Unit-Cell. Mater Sci Eng A Struct,
the Pore Morphology of Porous Nitinol with Suitable 745:195–202.
Mechanical Properties for Biomedical Applications. Mater https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.104.
Lett, 154:17–20. 101. Attar H, Löber L, Funk A, et al., 2015, Mechanical Behavior
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.057. of Porous Commercially Pure Ti and Ti-TiB Composite
92. Reilly GC, Engler AJ, 2010, Intrinsic Extracellular Matrix Materials Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Mater
Properties Regulate Stem Cell Differentiation. J Biomech, Sci Eng A Struct, 625:350–6.
43:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.036.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.009. 102. Soro N, Attar H, Brodie E, et al., 2019, Evaluation of the
93. Chang B, Song W, Han T, et al., 2016, Influence of Pore Size Mechanical Compatibility of Additively Manufactured
of Porous Titanium Fabricated by Vacuum Diffusion Bonding Porous Ti-25Ta Alloy for Load-Bearing Implant Applications.
of Titanium Meshes on Cell Penetration and Bone Ingrowth. J Mech Behav Biomed, 97:149–58.
Acta Biomater, 33:311–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.022. 103. Lowther M, Louth S, Davey A, et al., 2019, Clinical,
94. van Eeden SP, Ripamonti U, 1994, Bone Differentiation Industrial, and Research Perspectives on Powder Bed Fusion
in Porous Hydroxyapatite in Baboons is Regulated by the Additively Manufactured Metal Implants. Addit Manuf,
Geometry of the Substratum: Implications for Reconstructive 28:565–84.
Craniofacial Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg, 93:959–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.033.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199404001-00010. 104. Attar H, Ehtemam-Haghighi S, Soro N, et al., 2020,
95. Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, et al., 2006, Pore Additive Manufacturing of Low-Cost Porous Titanium-
Throat Size and Connectivity Determine Bone and Tissue Based Composites for Biomedical Applications: Advantages,
Ingrowth Into Porous Implants: Three-Dimensional Micro- Challenges and Opinion for Future Development. J Alloys
CT Based Structural Analyses of Porous Bioactive Titanium Compd, 827:154263.
Implants. Biomaterials, 27:5892–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154263.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013. 105. Elahinia M, Shayesteh N, Taheri M, et al., 2016, Progress

40 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2