Page 142 - IJB-7-3

Multiresponsive Graphene-Oxide Embedded ECM Hydrogel for 3D Bioprinting
Bone Defects in a Rat Model. Sci Rep, 8:6307. Simulation Study. Langmuir, 28:235–41.
32. Chen C, Bai X, Ding Y, et al., 2019, Electrical Stimulation 46. Capella-Monsonís H, Coentro JQ, Graceffa V, et al., 2018, An
as a Novel Tool for Regulating Cell Behavior in Tissue Experimental Toolbox for Characterization of Mammalian
Engineering. Biomater Res, 23:25. Collagen Type I in Biological Specimens. Nat Protoc,
33. Fu C, Pan S, Ma Y, et al., 2019, Effect of Electrical Stimulation 13:507–29.
Combined with Graphene-oxide-based Membranes on 47. Linero I, Chaparro O, 2014, Paracrine Effect of Mesenchymal
Neural Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation. Artif Cells Stem Cells Derived from Human Adipose Tissue in Bone
Nanomed Biotechnol, 47:1867–76. Regeneration. PLoS One, 9:e107001.
34. Kwon HJ, Lee GS, Chun H, 2016, Electrical Stimulation 48. Hermanson GT, 2013, Zero-Length Crosslinkers. In:
Drives Chondrogenesis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Bioconjugate Techniques, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands,
Absence of Exogenous Growth Factors. Sci Rep, 6:39302. p259–73.
35. Sadeghian RB, Ebrahimi M, Salehi S, 2017, Electrical 49. Lim KS, Schon BS, Mekhileri NV, et al., 2016, New Visible-
Stimulation of Microengineered Skeletal Muscle Tissue: Light Photoinitiating System for Improved Print Fidelity in
Effect of Stimulus Parameters on Myotube Contractility and Gelatin-Based Bioinks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2:1752–62.
Maturation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 12:912–22. 50. Yoon HJ, Shin SR, Cha JM, et al., 2016, Cold Water Fish
36. Hirt MN, Boeddinghaus J, Mitchell A, et al., 2014, Functional Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering
Improvement and Maturation of Rat and Human Engineered Application. PLoS One, 11:e0163902.
Heart Tissue by Chronic Electrical Stimulation. J Mol Cell 51. Drzewiecki KE, Parmar AS, Gaudet ID, et al., 2014,
Cardiol, 74:151–61. Methacrylation Induces Rapid Temperature-Dependent,
37. Ashtari K, Nazari H, Ko H, et al., 2019, Electrically Reversible Self-Assembly of Type-I Collagen. Langmuir,
Conductive Nanomaterials for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. 30:11204–11.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 144:162–79. 52. Ravichandran R, Islam MM, Alarcon EI, et al., 2016,
38. Javadi M, Gu Q, Naficy S, et al., 2017, Conductive Tough Functionalised Type-I Collagen as a Hydrogel Building
Hydrogel for Bioapplications. Macromol Biosci, 18:1700270. Block for Bio-orthogonal Tissue Engineering Applications.
39. Zhou X, Cui H, Zhang LG, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinted J Mater Chem B, 4:318–26.
Graphene Oxide-incorporated Matrix for Promoting 53. Tang H, Zhang S, Huang T, et al., 2020, Effects of pH and
Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Electrolytes on the Sheet-to-Sheet Aggregation Mode of
Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Carbon, 116:615–24. Graphene Oxide in Aqueous Solutions. Environ Sci Nano,
40. Ku SH, Park CB, 2013, Myoblast Differentiation on Graphene 7:984–95.
Oxide. Biomaterials, 34:2017–23. 54. Hong BJ, Compton OC, An Z, et al., 2011, Successful
41. Liu Y, Zhang B, Xu Q, et al., 2018, Development of Graphene Stabilization of Graphene Oxide in Electrolyte Solutions:
Oxide/Polyaniline Inks for High Performance Flexible Enhancement of Biofunctionalization and Cellular Uptake.
Microsupercapacitors via Extrusion Printing. Adv Funct ACS Nano, 6:63–73.
Mater, 28:1706592. 55. Cha C, Shin SR, Gao X, et al., 2013, Controlling Mechanical
42. Sánchez-Palencia DM, D’Amore A, González-Mancera A, Properties of Cell-Laden Hydrogels by Covalent Incorporation
et al., 2014, Effects of Fabrication on the Mechanics of Graphene Oxide. Small, 10:514–23.
Microstructure and Micromechanical Environment of 56. Huang CT, Shrestha LK, Ariga K, et al., 2017, A
Small Intestinal Submucosa Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Graphenepolyurethane Composite Hydrogel as a Potential
Engineering. J Biomech, 47:2766–73. Bioink for 3D Bioprinting and Differentiation of Neural Stem
43. Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, et al., 2010, Improved Cells. J Mater Chem B, 5:8854–64.
Synthesis of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano, 4:4806–14. 57. Li Z, Shen J, Ma H, et al., 2012, Preparation and
44. Gaudet ID, Shreiber DI, 2012, Characterization of Characterization of pH and Temperature-Responsive
Methacrylated Type-I Collagen as a Dynamic Photoactive Hydrogels with Surface-functionalized Graphene Oxide as
Hydrogel. Biointerphases, 7:25. the Crosslinker. Soft Matter, 8:3139.
45. Shih CJ, Lin S, Sharma R, et al., 2011, Understanding the pH- 58. Sayyar S, Murray E, Thompson BC, et al., 2015, Processable
Dependent Behavior of Graphene Oxide Aqueous Solutions: conducting graphene/chitosan hydrogels for tissue
A Comparative Experimental and Molecular Dynamics engineering. J Mater Chem B, 3:481–90.

138 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3