Page 114 - IJB-7-4
P. 114

CTP Scaffolds Treated Bone Defects
           CFZ-incorporated scaffolds, which are produced by 3D   6.   Lee JY, Son SJ, Son JS, et al., 2016, Bone-Healing Capacity
           printing, in promoting bone regeneration in critical-sized   of PCL/PLGA/Duck Beak Scaffold in Critical Bone Defects
           bone defects.                                           in a Rabbit Model. Biomed Res Int, 2016:2136215.
           Acknowledgments                                         https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2136215
                                                               7.   Walsh WR, Vizesi F, Michael D, et al., 2008, Bruceβ-TCP
           This  work  was  supported  by  Guangxi  Science  and   Bone  Graft  Substitutes  in  a  Bilateral  Rabbit  Tibial  Defect
           Technology    Program      (2018GXNSFAA294116,          Model. Biomaterials, 29:266–71.
           2018GXNSFAA138074,2018GXNSAA294091), Guangxi
           key  R  &  D  Project  (Guike  AB18050008),  Scientific      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.035
           Research  Project  of  High-level  talents  in  the  affiliated   8.   Huang  J,  Liu  W,  Liang  Y,  et al.,  2018,  Preparation  and
           Hospital  of  Youjiang  Medical  College  for  nationalities   Biocompatibility  of  Diphasic  Magnetic  Nanocomposite
           (R20196301,  R20196306),  High-level  Innovation  team   Scaffold. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 87:70–7.
           and  Outstanding  Scholars  Program  of  Colleges  and   9.   Ji C, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A, et al., 2011, Fabrication
           Universities  in  Guangxi:  innovative  team  of  basic  and   of  Porous  Chitosan  Scaffolds  for  Soft  Tissue  Engineering
           Clinical  Comprehensive  Research  on  Bone  and  Joint   using Dense Gas Co . Acta Biomater, 7:1653–64.
           degenerative Diseases.                                                2
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.043
           Conflicts of interest                               10.  Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI, 2002, Peptide-Amphiphile
                                                                   NanofibersA Versatile Scaffold for the Preparation of Self-
           The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
                                                                   Assembling Materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:5133–8.
           Author contributions                                    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072699999
           K L., J L. and YJ T. conceived the project. Y L. KG X. and   11.  Green JD, Tollemar V, Dougherty M, et al., 2015, Multifaceted
           C W. conducted the scaffold fabrication, characterization.   Signaling  Regulators  of  ChondrogenesisImplications  in
           CL Y., GF D., GG H. and K H. conducted the in vitro     Cartilage Regeneration and Tissue engineering. Genes Dis,
           release/degradation test and in vitro cell culture. F L., CC   2:307–27.
           Z., SJ D. and J C. conducted the in vivo experiments in rat   12.  Gaasbeek RD, Toonen HG, van Heerwaarden RJ, et al., 2005,
           cranial defects and analyzed the related data. QY L., J L.   Mechanism of Bone Incorporation of β-TCP Bone Substitute
           and LQ W. contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
                                                                   in Open Wedge Tibial Osteotomy in Patients. Biomaterials,
           References                                              26:6713–9.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.056
           1.   Sharif F, Ur Rehman I, Muhammad N, et al., 2016, Dental   13.  Michalicka M, Boisjoli G, Jahan S, et al., 2017, Human Bone
               Materials for Cleft Palate Repair. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol   Marrow  Mesenchymal  Stromal  Cell-Derived  Osteoblasts
               Appl, 61:1018–28.                                   Promote  the  Expansion  of  Hematopoietic  Progenitors
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.019          Through Beta-Catenin and Notch Signaling Pathways. Stem
           2.   Marx  RE,  2007,  Bone  and  Bone  Graft  Healing.  Oral   Cells Dev, 26:1735–48.
               Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 19:455–66.           https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2017.0133
           3.   Agarwal  R,  García  AJ,  2015,  Biomaterial  Strategies  for   14.  Zhang  C,  Hu  B,  Chen Y,  et al.,  2013,  Characterization  of
               Engineering  Implants  for  Enhanced  Osseointegration  and   the Molecular Mechanism of the Bone-Anabolic Activity of
               Bone Repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 94:53–62.          Carfilzomib in Multiple Myeloma. PLoS One, 8:e74191.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.013          https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074191
           4.   Pilliar RM, Filiaggi MJ, Wells JD, et al., 2001, Porous Calcium   15.  Hurchla MA, Garcia-Gomez A, Hornick MC, et al., 2012,
               Polyphosphate  Scaffolds  for  Bone  Substitute Applications-  The Epoxyketone-Based Proteasome Inhibitors Carfilzomib
               In Vitro Characterization. Biomaterials, 22:963–72.  and  Orally  Bioavailable  Oprozomib  Have  Anti-Resorptive
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00261-1       and  Bone-Anabolic Activity  in Addition  to Anti-Myeloma
           5.   Lai  Y,  Li  Y,  Cao  H,  et  al.,  2019,  Osteogenic  Magnesium   Effects. Leukemia, 27:430–40.
               Incorporated into PLGA/TCP Porous Scaffold by 3D Printing      https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.183
               for  Repairing  Challenging  Bone  Defect.  Biomaterials,   16.  Yang Y, Blair HC, Shapiro IM, et al., 2015, The Proteasome
               197:207–19.                                         Inhibitor  Carfilzomib  Suppresses  Parathyroid  Hormone-
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.013  induced  Osteoclastogenesis  through  a  RANKL-Mediated

           110                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119