Page 157 - IJB-7-4
P. 157

Jaksa, et al.
           field  of  soft  robotics,  wearable  electronic  devices,  or   for Education in Anatomy. Anat Sci Educ., 6:211–5.
           sports equipment.                                   7.   Sulaiman A, Boussel L,  Taconnet  F,  et  al., 2008,  In vitro
           Funding                                                 Non-rigid Life-size Model of  Aortic  Arch  Aneurysm for
                                                                   Endovascular  Prosthesis Assessment.  Eur J Cardiothorac
           This work was supported by the Provincial Government    Surg, 33:53–7.
           of Lower  Austria (Land Niederösterreich)  under grant      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.10.016
           assignment number WST3-F2-528983/005-2018.
                                                               8.   Giesel FL, Hart  AR, Hahn HK,  et al., 2009, 3D
           Conflicts of interest                                   Reconstructions of the Cerebral  Ventricles and  Volume
                                                                   Quantification in Children with Brain Malformations. Acad
           Concerning  the manufacturing technology  described  in
           Materials  and Methods subsections  2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, a   Radiol, 16:610–7.
           patent application has been filed by the Austrian Center      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.11.010
           for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT Gmbh)   9.   Golab A, Smektala T, Kaczmarek K, et al., 2017, Laparoscopic
           at the European Patent Office under applicant reference   Partial  Nephrectomy  Supported  by  Training  Involving
           number 51241. The inventors are Laszlo Jaksa, Andrea    Personalized Silicone Replica Poured in Three-Dimensional
           Lorenz and Dieter Pahr.                                 Printed Casting Mold.  J  Laparoendosc Adv  Surg  Tech A,

           Author contributions                                    27:420–2.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0596
           L. J. designing and assembling the 3D-printer, conducting   10.  Mavili  ME,  Canter  HI,  Sağlam-Aydinatay  B,  et al., 2007,
           all tests, writing the manuscript D. P. consulting and
           supervising the design and publication processes G. K.   Use of Three-Dimensional  Medical Modeling Methods for
           consulting and supervising the design and publication   Precise Planning of Orthognathic Surgery. J Craniofac Surg,
           processes A. L. consulting and supervising the design,   18:740–7.
           assembly, testing and publication processes, managing      https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e318069014f
           component procurement and research budget.          11.  Poukens  J, Haex  J, Riediger  D, 2003,  The  Use of  Rapid
           References                                              Prototyping in the Preoperative  Planning of Distraction
                                                                   Osteogenesis of the Cranio-maxillofacial Skeleton. Comput
           1.   Ventola CL, 2014, Medical  Applications for 3D Printing:   Aided Surg, 8:146–54.
               Current and Projected Uses. P T, 39:704–11.         https://doi.org/10.3109/10929080309146049
           2.   Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al., 2010,   12.  Tack P,  Victor  J, Gemmel  P,  et al., 2016, 3D-Printing
               3D Printing Based on Imaging Data: Review of Medical   Techniques  in a Medical  Setting:  A  Systematic  Literature
               Applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 5:335–41.  Review. Biomed Eng Online, 15:115.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x           https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
           3.   Wang K, Ho CC, Zhang C, et al., 2017, A Review on the 3D   13.  Yan Q, Dong H, Su J, et al., 2018, A Review of 3D Printing
               Printing of Functional Structures for Medical Phantoms and   Technology for Medical Applications. Engineering, 4:729–42.
               Regenerated  Tissue  and  Organ  Applications.  Engineering,   14.  Qian Z, Wang K, Liu S, et al., 2017, Quantitative Prediction of
               3:653–62.                                           Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.05.013           Based on Tissue-Mimicking 3D Printing. JACC Cardiovasc
           4.   Pietrabissa  A, Marconi  S, Negrello  E,  et  al.,  2019, An   Imaging, 10:719–31.
               Overview  on 3D Printing  for  Abdominal  Surgery.  Surg      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.005
               Endosc, 34(1):1–13.                             15.  Ratinam  R, Quayle M, Crock J,  et al., 2019, Challenges
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07155-5          in Creating Dissectible Anatomical 3D  Prints for Surgical
           5.   Preece D,  Williams  SB, Lam R,  et al., 2013, Let’s Get   Teaching. J Anat, 234:419–37.
               Physical: Advantages of a Physical Model Over 3D Computer      https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12934
               Models and Textbooks in Learning Imaging Anatomy. Anat   16.  Wang K,  Wu C, Qian Z,  et al., 2016, Dual-material  3D
               Sci Educ., 6:216–24.                                Printed  Metamaterials  with Tunable  Mechanical  Properties
               https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345                    for  Patient-specific  Tissue-mimicking  Phantoms.  Addit
           6.   Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, et al., 2013, The Relative   Manuf, 12:31–7.
               Effectiveness of Computer-based and Traditional Resources      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.006

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4       153
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162