Page 176 - IJB-7-4
P. 176

3D Printing Custom Shoe Sole






























           Figure 2. A schematic workflow of custom 3D-printed midsole production.


           process starts with receiving the foot shape of an              s             n
           individual using scan or even the shoe size. Then, the     W =  ∑ i   i 1  − 3) 3  +  ∑  DI(  i 1  − 3)  (1)
                                                                             CI(
                                                                                             i
           lattice of different shapes, for example, three here, are       = i 0        is
                                                                                         = +1
           designed and generated in computer-aided design (CAD)
           software. It should be noted that the cell size of lattices
           is  chosen  arbitrarily  while  their  effect  is  considerable   W = aI  + bI 4  + cI           (2)
           for a further study to deliver more regional stiffness in        1   1      2
           sole  as  per  individual  specifications,  such  as  diabetic
           patients.  Next,  a  simulation is  carried out  in  an FEA   The viscoelastic behavior of EPU40 for 3D printing
           platform called ABAQUS, considering the nonlinearity   of midsole is characterized at different strain rates and
           and viscoelastic properties of the 3D printing material   it was used in this work to simulate the results having
           to reflect the stress distribution on the midsole surface in   validated  using  FEA  in  ABAQUS.  To  find  the  stress-
           contact with plantar subjected to increasing, downward-  strain relationship  in quasi-static  state,  homogeneous
                                                                                                            37]
           directed displacement, which leads to contact with   uniaxial tensile test with low strain rate were conducted .
           the rigid ground surface and compression of the     Furthermore,  to  confirm  the  ability  of  traction,  that  is,
           lattice. Finally, the desired lattice providing less stress   high elongation in the failure of EUP40 in the set of
           compatible to the user application, that is, walking or   experiments,  the  strain  rates  of 0.032/s, 0.128/s, and
           running, are suggested for 3D printing.             0.576/s at  speeds of  50  mm/min,  200  mm/min,  and
                                                               900  mm/min  were  conducted, respectively, to  achieve
           2.2. Materials preparation and characteristics      high elongation.
           DLS technology is a new printing method for 3D printing   The validation of stress-strain results at different
           of soft polymers. Elastomeric polyurethane (EUP40) is a   strain rates are shown in Figure 3. According to this
           type of soft polymer that can be printed by this method.   figure,  increasing  the  strain  rate  has  increased  the
           This material has an elongation length of about 275%,   stress in the same strain by 100%.  This behavior of
           shear strength 23 kN.m, shore hardness 68A, and T  (glass   material indicates that models (1) and (2) are suitable
                                                     g
           transition temperature) 8°C . These properties have led   to use to understand the behavior of the midsole
                                  [37]
           to  EUP40  being  classified  as  a  rubber-like  viscoelastic   material. Finally, after performing quasi-static tests,
           material.  For this  reason,  the  neo-Hookean  and Yeoh’s   cyclic tests, relaxation tests, and experimental study of
           rubber-like model as well as Carol are used to study the   material behavior, the parameters of the two models are
           behavior of the material as:                        presented in Table 1.




           172                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181