Page 44 - IJB-7-4
P. 44

3D-printed Bolus in Radiotherapy
               Oncol, 8:e167–4.                                    https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450118666170704132523
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2017.11.001      37.  Bonani W, Cagol N, Maniglio D, 2020, Alginate Hydrogels:
           27.  Chiozzini GC, Mendes GP, Vanni FP, et al., 2020, Bacterial   A Tool for 3D Cell Encapsulation, Tissue Engineering, and
               nanocellulose membrane as bolus in radiotherapy: “Proof of   Biofabrication. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1250:49–61.
               concept”. Cellulose, 28:607–13.                     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3262-7_4
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03579-8      38.  Xu J, Zheng S, Hu X, 2020, Advances in the Research of
           28.  Cooke SL, Whittington AR, 2016, Influence of Therapeutic   Bioinks  Based  on  Natural  Collagen,  Polysaccharide  and
               Radiation  on  Polycaprolactone  and  Polyurethane  Their Derivatives for Skin 3D Bioprinting. Polymers (Basel),
               Biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 60:78–83.  12:1237.
           29.  Bil  M,  Kijeńska-Gawrońska  E,  Głodkowska-Mrówka  E,      https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061237
               et al., 2020, Design and In Vitro Evaluation of Electrospun   39.  Haq  MA,  Su  Y,  Wang  D,  2017,  Mechanical  Properties  of
               Shape  Memory  Polyurethanes  for  Self-Fitting  Tissue   PNIPAM  Based  Hydrogels:  A  Review.  Mater Sci Eng C
               Engineering Grafts and Drug Delivery Systems. Mater Sci   Mater Biol Appl, 70:842–55.
               Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 110:110675.              40.  Zhang B, Li S, Hingorani H, et al., 2018, Highly Stretchable
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110675          Hydrogels  for  UV  Curing  Based  High-Resolution
           30.  Eslahi N, Abdorahim M, Simchi A, 2016, Smart Polymeric   Multimaterial 3D Printing. J Mater Chem B, 6:3246–53.
               Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: A Review on the      https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tb00673c
               Chemistry  and  Biological  Functions.  Biomacromolecules,   41.  Sun  JY,  Zhao  X,  Illeperuma  WR,  et  al., 2012, Highly
               17:3441–63.                                         Stretchable and Tough Hydrogels. Nature, 489:133–6.
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01235      42.  Truby  RL,  Lewis  JA,  2016,  Printing  Soft  Matter  in Three
           31.  Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why   Dimensions. Nature, 540:371–8.
               We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145.     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21003
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145  43.  Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, et al., 2016, 3D Printing of Functional
           32.  Askari M, Naniz MA, Kouhi M, et al., 2021, Recent Progress   Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol,
               in Extrusion  3D Bioprinting  of Hydrogel Biomaterials   40:103–12.
               for  Tissue Regeneration:  A  Comprehensive  Review with   44.  Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and
               Focus  on Advanced  Fabrication Techniques.  Biomater  Sci,   Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.
               9:535–73.                                           https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
               https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00973c              45.  Zhou  LY,  Fu  J,  He  Y,  2020,  A  Review  of  3D  Printing
           33.  Tao G, Wang Y, Cai R, et al., 2019, Design and Performance   Technologies for Soft Polymer Materials. Adv Funct Mater,
               of Sericin/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel as a Drug Delivery   30:2000187.
               Carrier for Potential Wound Dressing Application. Mater Sci      https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187
               Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 101:341–51.              46.  Kinstlinger  IS,  Bastian A,  Paulsen  SJ,  et  al., 2016, Open-
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.111          Source Selective Laser Sintering (OpenSLS) of Nylon and
           34.  Wang  T,  Qu  G,  Wang  C,  et  al., 2019, Importance  of   Biocompatible Polycaprolactone. PLoS One, 11:e0147399.
               Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Diverse Chains and Cross-Linking      https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147399
               Density for Cell Proliferation, Aging, and Death. Langmuir,   47.  Soe  SP,  Eyers  DR,  Setchi  R,  2013,  Assessment  of  Non-
               35:13999–4006.                                      Uniform Shrinkage in the  Laser Sintering  of Polymer
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02799.s001   Materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 68:111–25.
           35.  An H, Zhu L, Shen J, et al., 2020, Self-Healing PEG-Poly      https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4712-0
               (Aspartic Acid) Hydrogel with Rapid Shape Recovery and   48.  Liu K, Sun H, Tan Y, et al., 2016, Additive Manufacturing
               Drug Release. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 185:110601.  of Traditional Ceramic Powder Via Selective Laser Sintering
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110601      with  Cold  Isostatic  Pressing.  Int J  Adv Manuf Technol,
           36.  Hussain Z, Thu HE, Shuid AN, et al., 2018, Recent Advances   90:945–52.
               in  Polymer-based  Wound  Dressings  for  the  Treatment  of      https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9441-3
               Diabetic Foot Ulcer: An Overview of State-of-the-Art. Curr   49.  Novitsky TF, Mathias LJ, Osborn S, et al., 2012, Synthesis
               Drug Targets, 19:527–50.                            and  Thermal Behavior of Polyamide 12,  T Random and

           40                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49