Page 45 - IJB-7-4
P. 45

Lu, et al.
               Block Copolymers. Macromol Symp, 313–314:90–9.      Development of High-Throughput Glass Inkjet Devices for
               https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201250310              Pharmaceutical Applications. J Pharm Sci, 103:3733–42.
           50.  Gu  D,  Wang  H,  Zhang  G,  2014,  Selective  Laser  Melting      https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.24192
               Additive  Manufacturing  of Ti-Based  Nanocomposites: The   62.  Poozesh S, Saito K, Akafuah NK, et al., 2016, Comprehensive
               Role of Nanopowder. Metall Mater Trans A, 45:464–76.  Examination of a New Mechanism to Produce Small Droplets
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1968-4           in  Drop-on-Demand  Inkjet  Technology.  Appl  Phys A,
           51.  Ramanath HS, Chua CK, Leong KF, et al., 2008, Melt Flow   122:110.
               Behaviour of Poly-Epsilon-Caprolactone in Fused Deposition      https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-9630-9
               Modelling. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 19:2541–50.   63.  Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent Advances
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3203-6           in  Formulating  and  Processing  Biomaterial  Inks  for  Vat
           52.  Heras  ES,  Haro  FB,  2018,  Filament  Advance  Detection   Polymerization‐Based  3D  Printing.  Adv Healthc Mater,
               Sensor for Fused Deposition Modelling 3D Printers. Sensors   9:2000156.
               (Basel), 18:1495.                                   https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156
               https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051495               64.  Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat Polymerization-
           53.  Hrynevich A,  Elçi  B,  Haigh  JN,  et  al.,  2018,  Dimension-  Based  Bioprinting-Process, Materials,  Applications  and
               Based  Design  of  Melt  Electrowritten  Scaffolds.  Small,   Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001.
               14:e1800232.                                        https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
               https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201800232          65.  Melchels  FP,  Feijen  J,  Grijpma  DW,  2010,  A  Review  on
           54.  Cheng Y, Chan KH, Wang XQ, et al., 2019, Direct-Ink-Write   Stereolithography and its  Applications  in Biomedical
               3D Printing of Hydrogels into Biomimetic Soft Robots. ACS   Engineering. Biomaterials, 31:6121–30.
               Nano, 13:13176–84.                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b06144         66.  Kumar H, Kim K, 2020, Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting.
           55.  Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al., 2017, Proposal to Assess   Methods Mol Biol, 2140:93–108.
               Printability  of Bioinks  for Extrusion-Based  Bioprinting   67.  Laza  SC,  Polo  M,  Neves  AA,  et  al.,  2012, Two-Photon
               and  Evaluation  of  Rheological  Properties  Governing   Continuous Flow Lithography. Adv Mater, 24:1304–8.
               Bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9:044107.          https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103357
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8        68.  Annabi  N,  Tamayol  A,  Uquillas  JA,  et  al., 2014,
           56.  Zhou  LY,  2019,  Multimaterial  3D  Printing  of  Highly   25  Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of
                                                                    th
               Stretchable Silicone Elastomers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,   Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine. Adv Mater, 26:85–123.
               11:23573–83.                                        https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201303233
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b04873          69.  Ho CM, Mishra A, Hu K, et al., 2017, Femtosecond-Laser-
           57.  Kim Y, Yuk H, Zhao R, et al., 2018, Printing Ferromagnetic   Based 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering and Cell Biology
               Domains  for  Untethered  Fast-Transforming  Soft  Materials.   Applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 3:2198–214.
               Nature, 558:274–9.                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00438
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0185-0       70.  Gauvin R, Chen YC, Lee JW, et al., 2012, Microfabrication
           58.  Kuang  M,  Wang  L,  Song  Y,  2014,  Controllable  Printing   of Complex Porous Tissue Engineering Scaffolds using 3D
               Droplets  for  High-Resolution  Patterns.  Adv Mater,   Projection Stereolithography. Biomaterials, 33:3824–34.
               26:6950–8.                                          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305416          71.  Kelly  BE,  Bhattacharya  I,  2019,  Volumetric  Additive
           59.  Scoutaris N, Ross S, Douroumis D, 2016, Current Trends on   Manufacturing  Via  Tomographic  Reconstruction.  Science,
               Medical and Pharmaceutical Applications of Inkjet Printing   363:1075–9.
               Technology. Pharm Res, 33:1799–816.             72.  Raman R, Bhaduri B, Mir M, et al., 2016, High-Resolution
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-1931-3           Projection  Microstereolithography for Patterning  of
           60.  Negro A, Cherbuin Tm Lutolf MP, 2018, 3D Inkjet Printing of   Neovasculature. Adv Healthc Mater, 5:610–9.
               Complex, Cell-Laden Hydrogel Structures. Sci Rep, 8:17099.     https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500721
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35504-2      73.  Xu  X,  Awad  A,  Robles-Martinez  P,  et  al.,  2021,  Vat
           61.  Ehtezazi  T,  Dempster  NM,  Martin  GD,  et  al., 2014,   Photopolymerization  3D  Printing  for  Advanced  Drug

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4        41
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50