Page 49 - IJB-7-4
        P. 49
     Lin, et al.
           Table 1. Summary of the characteristic of different materials in 3D bioprinted biodegradable bone repair scaffolds
            Materials                         Features                                              References
           Bioceramics        Calcium         Excellent osteosimilarity, osteoinductive, biocompatibility,   [27-33]
                              phosphate       mechanical properties
                                              Hard to degrade, poor toughness
                              Bioglass        Eximious osteogenic properties, biocompatibility        [34-37]
                                              Insufficient mechanical strength
                              Silicate        High  biocompatibility,  osteoinductivity,  pro-hard  tissue   [38,39]
                                              regeneration ability
                                              Poor fracture toughness, too fast degradation
           Polymers           Natural         Good biocompatibility, degradability, printability, high   [46-52]
                              polymers        modulus of elasticity
                                              Poor mechanical  strength,  fast  degradation  rate,  single
                                              material function
                              synthetic       Wide range of material sources, gallows biocompatibility,   [53-54]
                              polymers        high mechanical strength
                                              Some  materials  are  difficult  to  degrade  and  have  no
                                              obvious osteogenic properties
           Composites                         Functional  diversity,  combination  of  excellent      [62-72]
                                              performance of various materials, wide range of material
                                              selection
           prepared by sintering β-TCP ceramic slurry to show good   slurry  and  that  hinokitiol-modified  scaffolds  were  also
           biocompatibility  in biological  experiments and provide   effective in suppressing cellular inflammatory responses.
           richer  calcium  and phosphorus elements  and growth   By adding different ratios of graphene to calcium silicate
           space for new bone formation after implantation in vivo.   powder, Shie et al.  showed that the Young’s modulus
                                                                               [43]
           However, β-TCP suffers from low mechanical strength   was increased by 47.1% with the addition of 1 wt% of
           and very rapid degradation, which limit its development   graphene  to calcium  silicate,  and the proliferation  and
           in the field of bone repair .                       expression  of  alkaline  phosphatase  (ALP),  osteogenic,
                                [37]
               Bioglass has good bioactivity, biocompatibility, and   and osteogenic-related proteins in hMSCs were superior
           promotes  bone  and  soft-tissue  regeneration,  making  it   to the expression results of pure calcium silicate.
           an excellent material for bone defect repair. One of the
           most  famous  bioactive  glass,  45S5,  can  rapidly  bond   2.2. Polymers
           to bone and promote bone growth away from the bone-  Polymers  are  long-chain  organic  materials  linked  by
           implant interface . Fujishiro et al. [39]  observed 24 weeks   covalent  bonds , mainly  including  natural  polymers
                         [38]
                                                                            [44]
           after  surgery in a  rat  femoral  defect  experiment  and   and synthetic  polymers such as COL, which are more
           found that  this bioactive  glass accelerated  the  rate  of   hydrophilic  and  can  form  hydrogels  with  high  water
           bone regeneration compared to HA. On the other hand,   content [45-47] .  The use of polymers in 3D printing not
           bioglass has disadvantages such as high brittleness and   only achieves more precise customization of the scaffold
           poor mechanical strength, which limit its application for   geometry, but also minimizes processing costs compared
           bone defects in load-bearing areas . Li et al. [41]  obtained   to other traditional molding methods.  At the same
                                       [40]
           porous  BG  scaffolds  with  controllable  mechanical   time, due to the lack of mechanical strength and single
           strength by modulating the molar ratio of SiO /CaO (90/5   function of natural polymers, research in the field of bone
                                                 2
           –  60/35),  and  the  characterization  results  showed  that   repair has focused on material selection and preparation
           the high content of SiO  produced more uniform crystal   methods for advanced polymer composites [48,49] .
                               2
           particles and dense sintering to improve the mechanical   Natural polymers are more widely used in 3D
           strength of the scaffolds.                          printing by virtue of their better bioactivity , mainly
                                                                                                     [50]
               Compared  to bioceramics  such as calcium       including COL, silk proteins, cellulose, and alginates .
                                                                                                            [51]
           phosphate,  calcium  silicate-based  biomaterials  exhibit   COL is the most abundant protein in the human body, and
           better  biodegradability, and osteoinductive  properties.   different types of COL bodies are distributed in different
           Huang et al. [42]  found that Si release and calcium silicate-  tissues  according  to  their  structure  and  hierarchical
                                  2+
           based  materials  accelerated  the  formation  of  bone-like   organization. Its unique triple helix structure is the basis
           apatite layers by printing hinokitiol-modified wollastonite   for the good stability and mechanical properties of COL
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4        45
     	
