Page 54 - IJB-7-4
P. 54

Filament Structure, 3D printing, Bone Repair Scaffolds
           achieve higher osteoinductivity of bioceramic materials,   parallel. The advantage of the hollow structure is that the
           Alksne et al.  prepared two bilayer scaffolds, that is, PLA   scaffold  has  large  porosity  to  facilitate  the  growth  and
                     [93]
           + HA and PLA + BG (Figure 2D); PLA + BG scaffolds   flow of osteoblasts and growth factors, transport nutrients
           were 15% more absorbent than other controls, provided   and load drugs, and its internal structure also provides a
           better nutrient and protein uptake, and induced the earliest   suitable space for the development of vascular growth.
           onset of ALP activity and the highest cellular activity, and   Feng et al.  successfully prepared a lotus root-like
                                                                            [95]
           a large amount of protein deposition was found on the   bone repair scaffold with parallel multichannel structure
           surface of PLA + BG scaffold. Due to the high process   (channel-struts-packed,  1-4CSP)  using  Mg  yellow
           ability of cell-carrying bioceramic scaffolds, Kim et al.    feldspar  (Figure  3A). The  porosity  (80%)  and  specific
                                                         [94]
           prepared  α-TCP/COL  scaffolds  with  ceramic  volume   surface area (~3.86 m g ) of the mimetic material were
                                                                                 2 −1
           fraction  over  70%  by  modulating  printing  parameters   significantly  higher,  and  micro-computed  tomography
           using  preosteoblasts  (Figure  2E), which had a higher   results showed that the BV/TV values were significantly
           elastic  modulus  (~0.55  MPa)  compared  to  the  control   higher  in  the  3CSP  group  (12.6%)  after  12  weeks  of
           group and a cell survival rate of over 91% (within 4 h),   implantation. They found that the porous scaffold is more
           concluding that cell-laden ceramic scaffold is a potentially   suitable for cell delivery and regeneration of large bone
           viable solution for bone regeneration.              defects.  The complexity  of the hierarchical  structure,
                                                               the mechanical properties required and the diversity of
           3.3. Hollow structure                               bone resident cells are the major challenges in building
                                                                                                            [96]
           Compared  with  the  conventional  bone  repair  scaffolds   bionic bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Zhang et al.
           with cylindrical filament structure or rectangular filament   successfully  fabricated  a  mimic  havers  bone  scaffold
           structure,  the  hollow  structure  scaffold  possesses  one   with magnesium  yellow  feldspar  as the  raw material
           or more pores that completely run through both sides   –  an  internal  mesh  structure  with  cylindrical  pores,
           of the scaffold, and the pores are usually distributed in   accompanied  by multiple  regularly  distributed  havers

                        A                         C                        E













                                                 D                        F
                        B









           Figure  3.  Schematic  diagram  of  hollow  structure  scaffold.  (A)  Schematic  diagram  of  Lotus-like  structure  scaffold .  (from  ref.
                                                                                                             [95]
                                                                                                  [95]
           licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license). (B) Schematic diagram of Haversian-like bone scaffold structure . (from
                                                                                                       [96]
           ref.  licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC) (C) Schematic diagram of non-porous,
             [96]
           monoporous and porous scaffold prepared from apatite material . (Reprinted with permission from Wang X, Lin M, Kang Y. Engineering
                                                        [97]
           Porous β-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) Scaffolds with Multiple Channels to Promote Cell Migration, Proliferation, and Angiogenesis.
           ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. 2019; 11(9):9223-9232. Copyright© 2019 American Chemical Society) (D) Schematic diagram
           of nut-like scaffold structure prepared from NICE bioink . (Reprinted with permission from Chimene D, Miller L, Cross L M, et al.
                                                     [98]
           Nanoengineered  Osteoinductive  Bioink  for  3D  Bioprinting  Bone Tissue. ACS Applied  Materials  and  Interfaces.  2020;  12(14):15976-
           15988. Copyright© 2020 American Chemical Society) (e) Schematic diagram of scaffold composed of highly microporous hollow filament
           structure . (Reprinted from Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 35(16), Moon Y W, Choi I J, Koh Y H, et al., Macroporous alumina
                 [99]
           scaffolds consisting of highly microporous hollow filaments using three-dimensional ceramic/camphene-based co-extrusion, 4623-4627.,
           Copyright © 2015, with permission from Elsevier) (F) Schematic diagram of GelMA porous gel scaffold [100] . (From ref. [100]  licensed under
           Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license).
           50                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59