Page 178 - IJB-8-1
P. 178

Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters of PLA/HA Bone Plates
           •   When the process parameters yielded larger areas of      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.022
              high temperature, the specimen had good mechanical   4.   Dos Santos  T, Merlini C,  Aragones  A, et al., 2019,
              properties. Larger areas could be heated, and the heat   Manufacturing and Characterization of Plates for
              dissipation was relatively slow for those parameters,   Fracture Fixation of Bone with Biocomposites of Poly
              making it easier to fully bond with the surrounding   (Lactic  Acid-Co-Glycolic  Acid) (PLGA) with Calcium
              materials.
           •   A high printing  pressure of the material  during   Phosphates Bioceramics.  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol
              printing helped the material  spread to both sides,   Appl, 103:109728.
              filling  the  gap  between  two  adjacent  lines  and      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.05.013
              reducing the porosity. A high pressure of the molten   5.   Dhandapani R, Krishnan PD, Zennifer A, et al., 2020, Additive
              material  helped  to  improve  the  bonding  quality   Manufacturing of Biodegradable Porous Orthopaedic Screw.
              between adjacent deposited lines and layers.         Bioact Mater, 5:458–67.
           •   When  the  HA  content  was 20%,  the  cross-section      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.03.009
              was rough compared to those of the pure PLA and
              10%  HA  specimens.  Furthermore,  it  contained  a   6.   Tong  Y, Kaplan DJ, Spivak JM, et al.,  2020, Three-
              large number of dimples and pores, thus reducing the   Dimensional Printing in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current
              bending properties of the specimen.                  Applications. Spine J, 20:833–46.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.11.004
           Acknowledgments                                     7.   Xia RZ, Zhai ZJ, Chang YY, et al., 2019, Clinical Applications
           We  would  like  to  acknowledge  the  financial  support   of 3‐Dimensional Printing Technology in Hip Joint. Orthop
           of the Natural  Science  Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur   Surg, 11:533–44.
           Autonomous Region of China (No. 2019D01C040) and        https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12468
           the  Postgraduate  scientific  research  innovation  project   8.   Wang F, Chen H, Yang P, et al., 2019, Three-Dimensional
           of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China (No.       Printed Porous Tantalum Prosthesis for Treating Inflammation
           XJ2021G047).
                                                                   after Total Knee Arthroplasty in One-Stage Surgery-a Case
           Conflict of interest                                    Report. J Int Med Res, 48:1-10.
           The authors reported no potential conflict of interest in      https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519891280
           this study.                                         9.   Xiao R, Feng X, Fan R, et al., 2020, 3D Printing of Titanium-
                                                                   Coated Gradient Composite Lattices  for Lightweight
           Author contributions                                    Mandibular Prosthesis. Compos B Eng, 193:108057.

           P.A. designed and performed the  experiments,  data      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108057
           analysis, and drafted the manuscript. H.J. participated in   10.  Liu D, Fu J, Fan H, et al., 2018, Application of 3D-Printed
           and assisted in most experiments. W.A. supervised the   PEEK Scapula Prosthesis in the  Treatment  of Scapular
           entire research process. A.K. assisted in internal defect   Benign Fibrous Histiocytoma: A Case Report. J Bone Oncol,
           testing.                                                12:78–82.

           References                                              https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2018.07.012
                                                               11.  Zhang C, Wang L, Kang J, et al., 2020, Bionic Design and
           1.   Ngo  TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, et al.,  2018, Additive   Verification of 3D Printed PEEK Costal Cartilage Prosthesis.
               Manufacturing (3D Printing):  A  Review of Materials,   J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 103:103561.
               Methods,  Applications  and Challenges.  Compos B Eng,      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103561
               143:172–96.                                     12.  Hedayati SK, Behravesh  AH,  Hasannia S, et al., 2020,
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012   3D  Printed  PCL  Scaffold  Reinforced  with  Continuous
           2.   Bozkurt  Y, Karayel  E,  2021,  3D Printing  Technology;   Biodegradable Fiber Yarn: A Study on Mechanical and Cell
               Methods, Biomedical Applications, Future Opportunities and   Viability properties. Polym Test, 83:106347.
               Trends. J Mater Res Technol, 14:1430–50.            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106347
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.050      13.  Wang W, Zhang B, Li M, et al., 2021, 3D Printing of PLA/
           3.   Kumar R, Kumar M, Chohan JS, 2021, The Role of Additive   n-HA  Composite  Scaffolds  with  Customized  Mechanical
               Manufacturing  for Biomedical  Applications:  A  Critical   Properties and Biological  Functions for Bone  Tissue
               Review. J Manuf Processes, 64:828–50.               Engineering. Compos B Eng, 224:109192.

           164                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183