Page 202 - IJB-8-1
P. 202

3D Printing of a Graphene-Modified Photopolymer Using SLA

























           Figure  5.  Fourier  transform  infrared  spectra  of  C=C  peak
           (1637 cm ) of R with different times of ultraviolet exposure.
                 -1
                                                               Figure  7.  Fourier  transform  infrared  spectra  of  C=C  peak
                                                               (1637 cm ) of R, R+G, R+GO, R+GoxNP after 5 min of ultraviolet
                                                                     −1
                                                               cure.

















           Figure  6.  Differential  scanning  calorimetry  thermograms  of  R,
           R+G, R+GO, R+GoxNP after 5 min of ultraviolet cure.
                                                               Figure 8. Polymerization degree versus ultraviolet polymerization
           higher peaks than R and R+GO, confirming the lower UV   time of R, R+G, R+GO, R+GoxNP.
           polymerization degree.
               When  FTIR  spectra  were  compared,  the  same     On  the  other  hand,  R+G  and  R+GoxNP
           tendency  was  observed.  By  studying  the  C=C  peak   showed  similar  tendencies  regarding  the  evolution  of
           at  1637  cm  (Figure  7),  it  is  possible  to  compare  the   polymerization degree with time. The presence of these
                     -1
                                                               nanofillers  showed  a  higher  impact  on  the  degree  of
           polymerization degree, which is more advanced when the   polymerization  when  compared  to  GO,  especially  for
           peak is less intense.                               relatively  medium  and  long  periods.  They  affect  the
               The FTIR results showed that R+G and R+GoxNP    process, achieving lower polymerization degrees than the
           followed  the  same  trend  when  compared  to  the   initial resin; this effect was especially notable in the case
           observed DSC data. After 5 min of UV exposure, their   of G.
           polymerization degree was lower than in the case of the   Table 4 shows changes in hardness as a function of
           pristine resin and R+GO.                            UV polymerization time for the different nanocomposites.
               Figure 8 showed the polymerization degree due to   In all cases, hardness increased with time, showing that
           the UV exposure (Eq. 3.1) and data presented in Table 3,   the  polymerization  process  was  advancing.  The  trend
           at  different  exposure  times.  It  can  be  seen  how  GO   observed in the hardness was similar to the obtained data
           retarded the polymerization process for short UV times;   from the DSC and FTIR analysis that the addition of G
           however, from 5 min of UV exposure, the polymerization   and GoxNP influenced the polymerization process of the
           degree was similar to R.                            resin;  they  did  not  allow  the  resin  to  cure  completely.

           188                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207