Page 101 - IJB-8-3
P. 101

Hu, et al.
           manufactured  under  an  accurate  computer-assisted   with  porous  structure,  which  is  conducive  to  bone
           digital  model [24] ,  there  are  inevitably  clinical  factors   ingrowth and fusion (Figure 3); and (v) The 3D-printed
           which preclude it from matching with the bone defect.   spinal prosthesis side near the spinal dura is designed to
           First,  tumors  cause  an  extensive  and  significant   be smooth, while the other side is rough. In addition, if
           anatomic  abnormality  of  the  spine,  therefore  even   there is a spinal pathological fracture or malformation,
           after  tumor  resection,  the  spine  structure  can  be  very   it  remains  difficult  to  precisely  reconstruct  the  height
           difficult to correct to our estimated anatomic position.   and  curvature  of  the  spine  via  CT  scan  parameters.
           Secondly,  it  takes  time  to  manufacture  a  3D-printed   Therefore, two-stage operations are sometimes needed,
           prosthesis  after  the  imaging  data  acquisition.  Some   with 3D-printed spinal implant surgery to be performed
           highly aggressive spinal tumors may rapidly grow and   in the second operation (Case 5).
           invade  the  spine  during  the  waiting  time.  3D-printed
           spinal  implant  reconstruction  offers  many  advantages   5. Conclusion
           but  also  comes  with  uncertainties  due  to  its  novel   It is clear that 3D-printed spinal implants will continue to
           nature.  Our  experience  with  these  cases  demonstrates   advance spinal surgery to a new level in the next decade .
                                                                                                            [27]
           the importance of having a good backup plan, including   Our  present  study  demonstrated  that  when  combined
           having  modular  prostheses  with  multiple  options  and   with  tumor  comprehensive  treatment,  3D-printed
           sizes to be used with conventional spinal reconstruction   spinal  implant  surgery  provides  patients  with  excellent
           techniques.
               Although  utilizing  3D-printing  implants  may   long-term  spinal  function  and  low  risk  of  local  tumor
           improve spinal reconstructive surgery , we must keep   recurrence. Future directions may show further promise
                                           [25]
                                                               with modifications of the surface of the 3D-printed spinal
           in mind that surgery is a local therapy, which must be
           supported  with  suitable  systematic  therapy  such  as   implants  to  allow  for  enhanced  osteogenic  effects  and
                                                                              [28,29]
           chemo-radiotherapy and targeted medications. Our study   anti-tumor activity  .
           demonstrated  that  neoadjuvant  and  adjuvant  therapies   Funding
           combined  with  3D-printed  spinal  implant  surgery
           provides satisfactory control for recurrent spinal tumors.   This  work  was  supported  by  the  National  Natural
           Zhuang et al.  indicated that 3D-printed spinal implant   Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 81872179;
                      [26]
           surgery combined with robotic radiotherapy could be a   Recipient: Wangjun Yan).
           new treatment paradigm for spinal tumors. In our study,
           a  patient  (Case  5)  underwent  intraoperative  radiation.   Conflict of Interest
           More trials combining neoadjuvant and adjuvant tumor   All authors declared that they have no competing interests.
           therapies  with  3D-printed  spinal  implant  surgery  are
           being explored in our institution.                  Author Contributions
               Compared to conventional spinal construction, our
           3D-printed  spinal  implant  has  the  following  custom-  X.H.  collected  and  analyzed  the  data  and  drafted  the
           made features: (i) Accurate vertebral height with multiple   manuscript. S.K. critically revised the manuscript. M.C. and
           alternative options. According to the CT reconstruction   W.C. participated in the surgery. W.H. and W.Y. participated
           result,  3D-printed  artificial  vertebral  bodies  with  three   in the surgery, designed the study, and revised the manuscript.
           different  heights  were  designed  and  produced:  The   All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
           standard height, the standard height +3 mm and −3 mm.   References
           Those 3D-printed spinal prostheses with different heights
           can maximally meet the surgeon’s selection to achieve   1.   Wixted CM, Peterson JR, Kadakia RJ, et al., 2021, Three-
           a  precise  implant  during  the  operation.  Anterior-to-  dimensional  Printing  in  Orthopaedic  Surgery:  Current
           posterior and left-to-right diameters were also precisely
           customized; (ii) The physiological curvature of the spine   Applications and Future Developments. J Am Acad Orthop
           can be reconstructed with the 3D-printed spinal prosthesis,   Surg Glob Res Rev, 5:e20.00230–11.
           as shown in Case 3 in our study; (iii) an optimal contact      https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00230
           area  can  be  customized  between  the  3D-printed  and   2.   Ejnisman  L,  Gobbato  B,  de  França  Camargo  AF,  et al.,
           autologous  vertebral  bodies.  The  contact  area  ranged   2021, Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopedics: From the
           from 60 to 80% with deviations outside of this range lead   Basics  to  Surgical  Applications.  Curr Rev Musculoskelet
           to complications. If it is too large, the prosthesis will be
           difficult to insert due to the increased tight fit. If it is too   Med, 14:1–8.
           small, the prosthesis will be too lax, leading to increased      https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09691-3
           risk of collapse; (iv) the contact interface can be designed   3.   Skelley NW, Smith MJ, Ma R, et al., 2019, Three-dimensional

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3        93
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106