Page 168 - IJB-8-3
P. 168

3DP Modularized Finger PIPJ Arthroplasty
           Table 5. The dislocation force of 25°, 35° and 55° for PIP joint   of  19N at  a  25°  angle  under  the  action  of  playing  the
           implant.                                            piano. The joint receives a force of 17N at a 35° angle
           Angle     S1       S2       S3       Mean±SD        when holding the pen under writing action and the joint
           25°      549.8N  513.0N   513.4N    525.3±21.2N     receives a force of 45N at a 55° angle while opening a
           35°      335.5N  309.5N   303.0N    316.0±17.2N     can. The dislocation test result under three daily activity
           55°      117.0N  114.1N   113.8N    115.0±1.8N      load conditions showed that the dislocation force values
                                                               for the three stress degrees were much higher than those
                                                               normal  joint  force  values  with  different  actions.  The
           Table 6. Static strength and capable percentage of 25000 dynamic   dislocation force decreased reasonably with larger joint
           cyclic loads with different angles.
                                                               angle but produced maximum misalignment. The fatigue
           Angle Static Strength Dynamic Fatigue Loading (%)   force ratio of misalignment to the literature data was set
           25°     525.3±21.2N        50 (26.25~262.5N)        as the safety factor. The fatigue limit of the 25°, 35°, and
           35°     316.0±17.2N         50 (15.8~158N)          55° groups was 262.5N, 158N, and 92N, respectively.
           55°      115.0±1.8N          80 (9.2~92N)           The corresponding three safety factors were about
                                                               14 (262.5N/19N), 9 (158N/17N), and 2 (92N/45N). This
                                                               was found at least more than twice the static acceptance
                                                               condition and addressed that the articular surface design
                                                               of our PIP joint can provide good anti-dislocation ability
                                                               under the force of daily activities.
                                                                   The stem fixation methods are mechanical, cement,
                                                               and bone ingrowth. Due to the smaller PIP joint size,
                                                               the type of fixation depends mainly on the bone stock
                                                               condition, which was often interfered with by the severity
                                                               of  arthritis.  Therefore,  cement  or  mechanical  fixation
                                                               was  often  difficult  and  impractical.  Our  modularized
                                                               elliptical cone shape stem aimed to provide adequate
                                                               contact area and force between the metal and phalangeal
                                                               bone and decreases the stress-relaxing properties by
                                                               further bone resorption, which reduces implant loosening
                                                               and fracture.
           Figure 6. Load-displacement diagram of dislocation tests.  To optimize  the osseointegration  ability  and
                                                               delaminate  implant  loosening, additive  manufacturing
           the modularized PIP joint implant showed in this study.   with enhancement of cell-biomaterial interactions is an
           Hence, we chose a commonly used combination of metal   attractive option since it is able to meet biological and
           on polymer. The main reason of using UHMWPE was its   functional  demands.  To optimize  the  osseointegration
           broad utility in current large joint arthroplasty, including   ability  and delaminate  implant  loosening,  additive
           hip, knee, ankle, and shoulder joint arthroplasty, as well   manufacturing  with enhancement of cell-biomaterial
           as its good ability of decreasing the bearing surface wear   interactions draw attention and is able to meet biological
                                                                                    [6]
           and  avoids  debris  or  particles  that  induce  third-body   and  functional  demands . 3D structured  material  that
           wear. Otherwise, the cross-linked polyethylene had not   comprises a lattice design was adopted on the metaphysis
           only shown superior results compared with previous   surface to promote bone ingrowth.  The constructs at
           polymer-on-polymer, such as UHMWPE but also a wear   distinctive  well-defined  range  of  length  scales  and
           rate comparable to metal-on-polymer combinations [15,16] .   parameter magnitudes are expected to differentially affect
           Cross-linked polyethylene was also able to be fabricated   on cellular  and surface  interaction  of osseointegration.
           by injection molding manufacturing to reduce production   Hara  et al. (2016) mentioned that metal-interfaced
           costs.  Cross-linked  polyethylene  was  proposed  as the   implants  with  diamond-structured  porous titanium-
           articular surface of the middle phalanx and contact   alloy  (Porous  Ti-alloy)  can  promote  osseointegration
                                                                                         [17]
           movement  with  3D  printing  polished  articular  surface   and enhance  implant  stability .  The  most important
           of the proximal phalanx for our PIP joint resurfacing   parameters that affect osseointegration are pore size and
           prosthesis.                                         porosity. The experimental group with a size of 640 μm
               In many common finger joint movements in daily   and a porosity of 70% had better  bone tissue growth
           life, such as playing the piano, writing with a pen and   ability  and the strongest mechanical  performance.  We
           open a can, the magnitude and angle of the joint force   already have the technology to design and fabricate this
           are well known [11,12] . The joints are subjected to a force   type of lattice on the elliptical-cone stem surface (0.8 mm

           160                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173