Page 169 - IJB-8-3

Hunag, et al.
thickness and a specific length of 6 mm for proximal side References
and 4 mm for middle side) in our PIP joint to promote
bone growth (Figure 5B). However, this technology 1. Yamamoto M, 2017, A Systematic Review of Different
needs to be tested in future in vivo experiments because Implants and Approaches for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint
the surface lattice design used in this in vitro anti-loosing Arthroplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg, 139:1139e–51.
pull-out test could not portray the function of bone https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000003260
growing into the lattice. 2. Lans J, 2019. Factors Associated with Reoperation after
In the design of our PIP joint, only 48 sets of CT Silicone Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty. Hand,
images of the hand were collected based on the image
reconstruction samples of 12 patients to establish 15:674–8.
the appearance of the anatomical articulation and https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719864453
modularized specification definition. Perhaps, more sets 3. Srnec JJ, 2017, Implant Arthroplasty for Proximal
of image augmentation databases should be included Interphalangeal, Metacarpophalangeal, and
to establish a design closer to the natural joint shape Trapeziometacarpal Joint Degeneration. J Hand Surg Am,
and contour in the future. The phalanx model for 42:817–25.
these functional mechanical experiments was a hot-
melt stacked ABS material. It utilized cadaver bone https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.07.030
and cannot simulate osseointegration. The load and 4. Bales JG, 2014, Long-Term Results of Swanson Silicone
boundary fixing method of the experimental setup was Arthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis.
a simplified clinical situation, which was different from J Hand Surg Am, 39:455–61.
the actual situation, and the result was only for trend https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.008
reference. 5. Selig HF, 2020, Outcome of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint
5. Conclusion Replacement with Pyrocarbon Implants: A Long-Term
Longitudinal Follow-up Study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,
We successfully developed a modularized PIP joint 140:1847–57.
implant which resembles the anatomical shape and an
elliptical-cone stem based on CT image reconstruction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03592-3
Complex geometry of each PIP joint component can be 6. Zaeri A, Cao K, Zhang FC, et al., 2022, A Review of
fabricated by 3D printing technology with traditional the Structural and Physical Properties that Govern Cell
mechanical polishing. Results of biomechanical tests Interactions with Structured Biomaterials Enabled by
encompassing static pull-out test, buckle mechanism test, Additive Manufacturing. Bioprinting, 26:e0020.
functional static and dynamic dislocation tests indicate https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00201
that our novel PIP joint implant reaches a certain joint 7. Aversano FJ, 2018, Salvaging a Failed Proximal
stability and ability to prevent dislocation under simulated
daily hand use activities. Interphalangeal Joint Implant. Hand Clin, 34:217–27.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2017.12.011
Funding 8. Griffart A, 2019, Arthroplasty of the Proximal Interphalangeal
This study was supported in part by MOST project 109- Joint with the Tactys Modular Prosthesis: Results in Case of
2622-B-010 -005 and 110-2221-E-075-004, Taiwan. Index Finger and Clinodactyly. Hand Surg Rehabil, 38:179–85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2019.03.001
Conflict of interest 9. Ying H, 2017, An Iterative Closest Points Algorithm
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. for Registration of 3D Laser Scanner Point Clouds with
Geometric Features. Sensors, 17:1862.
Author contributions
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081862
C.L.L supervised this study and revised the article 10. Li CH, Wu CH, Lin CL, 2020, Design of a Patient-Specific
of this manuscript. Y.C.H designed and supervised Mandible Reconstruction Implant with Dental Prosthesis
the development of PIP joint prosthesis and wrote for Metal 3D Printing Using Integrated Weighted Topology
manuscription. Y.C.H, C.M.C, S.F.H, and C.H.H,
conducted experiments and contributed intellectually Optimization and Finite Element Analysis. J Mech Behav
to the scientific design of the functional biomechanical Biomed Mater, 105:103700.
testing, C.M.C mentored the technical part of the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103700
project. 11. Butz KD, 2012, A Biomechanical Analysis of Finger

International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3 161