Page 136 - IJB-8-4
P. 136
3D-printed Abdominal Cavity Model for Liver Transplantation
printing): Techniques for Polymer Material Systems. Mater J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 23:406–13.
Today Chem, 16:10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.355
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248 12. Fukazawa K, Yamada Y, Nishida S, et al., 2013, Determination
3. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A Comprehensive of the Safe Range of Graft Size Mismatch Using Body Surface
Review on Droplet-based Bioprinting: Past, Present and Area Index in Deceased Liver Transplantation. Transpl Int,
Future. Biomaterials, 102:20–42. 26:724–33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012 https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12111
4. Kingsley DM, Roberge CL, Rudkouskaya A, et al., 2019, 13. Addeo P, Noblet V, Naegel B, et al., 2020, Large-for-size
Laser-based 3D Bioprinting for Spatial and Size Control Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review of
of Tumor Spheroids and Embryoid Bodies. Acta Biomater, Definitions, Outcomes, and Solutions. J Gastrointest Surg,
95:357–70. 24:1192–200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04505-5
5. Zaeri A, Cao K, Zhang F, et al., 2022, A Review of the Structural 14. Blanco AM, Krauel L, Artés FF, 2019, Development of
and Physical Properties that Govern Cell Interactions with a Patients-specific 3D-printed Preoperative Planning and
Structured Biomaterials Enabled by Additive Manufacturing. Training Tool, with Functionalized Internal Surfaces, for
Bioprinting, 26:e00201. Complex Oncologic Cases. Rapid Prototyp J, 25:363–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00201 https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-03-2018-0063
6. Marro A, Bandukwala T, Mak W, 2016, Three-dimensional 15. Igami T, Nakamura Y, Hirose T, et al., 2014, Application
Printing and Medical Imaging: A Review of the Methods and of a Three-dimensional Print of a Liver in Hepatectomy for
Applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 45:2–9. Small Tumors Invisible by Intraoperative Ultrasonography:
https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.07.009 Preliminary Experience. World J Surg, 38:3163–6.
7. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, Von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2740-7
3D Printing Based on Imaging Data: Review of Medical 16. Oshiro Y, Mitani J, Okada T, et al., 2017, A Novel Three-
Applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 5:335–41. dimensional Print of Liver Vessels and Tumors in
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x Hepatectomy. Surg Today, 47:521–4.
8. Madurska MJ, Poyade M, Eason D, et al., 2017, Development https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1383-8
of a Patient-specific 3D-printed Liver Model for Preoperative 17. Rhu J, Kim MS, Kim S, et al., 2021, Application of three-
Planning. Surg Innov, 24:145–50. dimensional Printing for Intraoperative Guidance during Liver
https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350616689414 Resection of a Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Sophisticated
9. Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M, et al., 2017, Value of 3D Location. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 25:265–69.
Printing for the Comprehension of Surgical Anatomy. Surg https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.2.265
Endosc, 31:4102–10. 18. Zein NN, Hanouneh IA, Bishop PD, et al., 2013, Three-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5457-5 dimensional Print of a Liver for Preoperative Planning in Living
10. Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, et al., 1999, Impact of Graft Donor Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl, 19:1304–10.
Size Mismatching on Graft Prognosis in Liver Transplantation https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23729
from Living Donors1, 2. Transplantation, 67:321–7. 19. Wang P, Que W, Zhang M, et al., 2019, Application of
https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199901270-00024 3-dimensional Printing in Pediatric Living Donor Liver
11. Fukazawa K, Nishida S, Pretto EA Jr., et al., 2016, Detrimental Transplantation: A Single-center Experience. Liver Transpl,
Graft Survival of Size-mismatched Graft for High Model for 25:831–40.
End-stage Liver Disease Recipients in Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25435
Publisher’s note
Whioce Publishing remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations.
128 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4

