Page 207 - IJB-8-4
P. 207

Ghosh and Yi
               on  Scaffold-free  Bioinks  for  Bioprinting.  Bioprinting,   51.  Prendergast  ME,  Davidson  MD,  Burdick  JA,  2021,  A
               19:e00088.                                          Biofabrication  Method to  Align Cells within Bioprinted
           39.  Zafar  MS, Amin  F,  Fareed  MA,  et  al.,  2020,  Biomimetic   Photocrosslinkable and Cell-degradable Hydrogel Constructs
               Aspects of Restorative Dentistry Biomaterials. Biomimetics   Via Embedded Fibers. Biofabrication, 13:044108.
               (Basel), 5:34.                                      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac25cc
               https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030034      52.  Yue K, Santiago GT, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, Synthesis,
           40.  Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, et al., 2009, Scaffold-free   Properties, and Biomedical  Applications  of Gelatin
               Vascular Tissue Engineering Using Bioprinting. Biomaterials,   Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73:254–71.
               30:5910–7.                                          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.034  53.  Ying  G,  Jiang  N,  Yu  C,  et al.,  2018,  Three-dimensional
           41.  Ovsianikov  A,  Khademhosseini  A,  Mironov  V,  2018,   Bioprinting  of  Gelatin  Methacryloyl  (GelMA).  Biodes
               The  Synergy  of  Scaffold-based  and  Scaffold-free  Tissue   Manuf, 1:215–24.
               Engineering Strategies. Trends Biotechnol, 36:348–57.  54.  Ouyang L, Armstrong JP, Chen Q, et al., 2019, Void-free 3D
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.01.005       Bioprinting  for  In Situ  Endothelialization  and  Microfluidic
           42.  Ozbolat IT, 2015, Scaffold-based or Scaffold-free Bioprinting:   Perfusion. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1908349.
               Competing or Complementing Approaches? J Nanotechnol      https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201908349
               Eng Med, 6:024701.                              55.  Muir  VG,  Burdick  JA,  2020,  Chemically  Modified
           43.  Shimizu T, Yamato M, Kikuchi A, et al., 2003, Cell Sheet   Biopolymers  for  the  Formation  of  Biomedical  Hydrogels.
               Engineering  for  Myocardial  Tissue  Reconstruction.   Chem Rev, 121:10908–49.
               Biomaterials, 24:2309–16.                           https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00923
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00110-8   56.  Burdick JA, Prestwich GD, 2011, Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels
           44.  Dahl  SL,  Rhim  C,  Song  YC,  et al.,  2007,  Mechanical   for Biomedical Applications. Adv Mater, 23:H41–56.
               Properties  and  Compositions  of  Tissue  Engineered  and      https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201003963
               Native Arteries. Ann Biomed Eng, 35:348–55.     57.  Wade RJ, Bassin EJ, Gramlich WM, et al., 2015, Nanofibrous
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9226-1           Hydrogels with Spatially Patterned Biochemical Signals to
           45.  Yu  Y,  Haghiashtiani  G,  Hübscher  T,  et  al.,  2016,  Three-  Control Cell Behavior. Adv Mater, 27: 1356–62.
               dimensional  Bioprinting  Using  Self-assembling  Scalable      https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201404993
               Scaffold-free  “Tissue  Strands”  as  a  New  Bioink.  Sci  Rep,   58.  Davidson  MD,  Ban  E,  Schoonen  AC,  et al.,  2020,
               6:1–11.                                             Mechanochemical  Adhesion  and  Plasticity  in  Multifiber
           46.  Alblawi A,  Ranjani AS, Yasmin  H,  et al.,  2020,  Scaffold-  Hydrogel Networks. Adv Mater, 32:e1905719.
               free: A Developing Technique in Field of Tissue Engineering.      https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201905719
               Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 185:105148.     59.  Gramlich  WM,  Kim  IL,  Burdick  JA,  2013,  Synthesis  and
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105148          Orthogonal  Photopatterning  of  Hyaluronic Acid  Hydrogels
           47.  De Pieri A, Rochev Y, Zeugolis DI, 2021, Scaffold-free Cell-  with Thiol-norbornene Chemistry. Biomaterials, 34:9803–11.
               based  Tissue  Engineering  Therapies:  Advances,  Shortfalls      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.089
               and Forecast. NPJ Regen Med, 6:1–15.            60.  Mendes  BB,  Gómez-Florit  M,  Hamilton AG,  et al.,  2019,
           48.  Lee  JM,  Yeong  WY,  2020,  Engineering  Macroscale  Cell   Human  Platelet  Lysate-Based  Nanocomposite  Bioink  for
               Alignment  Through  Coordinated  Toolpath  Design  Using   Bioprinting Hierarchical Fibrillar Structures. Biofabrication,
               Support-assisted  3D  Bioprinting.  J  R Soc Interface,   12:015012.
               17:20200294.                                        https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab33e8
           49.  Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2016, Design and Printing Strategies in   61.  Munaz  A,  Vadivelu  RK,  St.  John  J,  et al.,  2016,  Three-
               3D  Bioprinting  of  Cell-hydrogels: A  Review.  Adv Healthc   dimensional Printing of Biological Matters. J Sci Adv Mater
               Mater, 5:2856–65.                                   Dev, 1:1–17.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435          62.  Cho DW, Kim BS, Jang J, et al., 2019, Various Applications
           50.  Lee JM, Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, Resolution and Shape in   of  3D-Bioprinted  Tissues/Organs  Using  Tissue-Specific
               Bioprinting: Strategizing towards Complex Tissue and Organ   Bioinks. In: 3D Bioprinting. Berlin: Springer. p53–108.
               Printing. Appl Phys Rev, 6:011307.              63.  Khoeini R, Nosrati H, Akbarzadeh A, et al., 2021, Natural

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       199
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212