Page 209 - IJB-8-4
P. 209

Ghosh and Yi
               Biomaterials, 117:105–15.                           Matrix at a Glance. J Cell Sci, 123:4195–200.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.046     https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.023820
           90.  Singh  YP,  Bandyopadhyay  A,  Mandal  BB,  2019,  3D   103.  Sackett SD, Tremmel DM, Ma F, et al., 2018, Extracellular
               Bioprinting using Cross-Linker-Free Silk–Gelatin Bioink for   Matrix Scaffold and Hydrogel Derived from Decellularized
               Cartilage  Tissue  Engineering.  ACS  Appl Mater Interfaces,   and Delipidized Human Pancreas. Sci Rep, 8:10452.
               11:33684–96.                                        https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28857-1
           91.  Dingle  YT,  Bonzanni  M,  Liaudanskaya  V,  et al.,  2021,   104.  Alipal  J,  Wang  Y,  Liu  J,  et  al.,  2021,  A  Review  of
               Integrated  Functional  Neuronal  Network  Analysis  of  3D   Gelatin:  Properties,  Sources,  Process,  Applications,  and
               Silk-Collagen Scaffold-Based Mouse Cortical Culture. STAR   Commercialisation. Mater Today Proc, 42:240–50.
               Protoc, 2:100292.                               105.  Guvendiren  M,  Burdick  JA,  2013,  Engineering  Synthetic
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100292          Hydrogel  Microenvironments  to  Instruct  Stem  Cells.  Curr
           92.  Chawla  S,  Midha  S,  Sharma  A,  et al.,  2018,  Silk-based   Opin Biotechnol, 24:841–6.
               Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:1701204.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.009
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701204          106.  Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, et al., 2012, A Review
           93.  Chew KW, Show PL, Yap YJ, et al., 2018, Sonication and   of Trends and Limitations in Hydrogel-Rapid Prototyping for
               Grinding  Pre-treatments  on  Gelidium  Amansii  Seaweed   Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials, 33:6020–41.
               for  the  Extraction  and  Characterization  of  Agarose.  Front      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050
               Environ Sci Eng, 12:1–7.                        107.  Liu F, Zhou X, Cui F, et al., 2007, Synthesis and Properties
           94.  Phanthong  P,  Reubroycharoen  P,  Hao  X,  et  al.,  2018,   of  Poly  (hydroxyethyl  methacrylate)  Hydrogel  for  IOL
               Nanocellulose: Extraction and Application. Carbon Resour   Materials.  Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi,
               Conv, 1:32–43.                                      24:595–8.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004     108.  Yan Y, Xiong Z, Hu Y, et al., 2003, Layered Manufacturing of
           95.  Elieh-Ali-Komi  D,  Hamblin  MR,  2016,  Chitin  and   Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Via Multi-Nozzle Deposition.
               chitosan: Production and application of versatile biomedical   Mater Lett, 57:2623–8.
               nanomaterials. Int J Adv Res, 4:411.            109.  Guedes AC, Amaro HM, Malcata FX, 2011, Microalgae as
           96.  Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Hamblin MR, 2016, Chitin and Chitosan:   Sources of High Added-Value Compounds a Brief Review of
               Production  and  Application  of  Versatile  Biomedical   Recent Work. Biotechnol Prog, 27:597–613.
               Nanomaterials. Int J Adv Res (Indore), 4:411–27.     https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.575
           97.  Kou SG, Peters LM, Mucalo MR, 2021, Chitosan: A Review   110.  Moreno-Garrido I, 2008, Microalgae Immobilization: Current
               of Sources and Preparation Methods. Int J Biol Macromol,   Techniques and Uses. Bioresou Technol, 99:3949–64.
               169:85–94.                                          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.040
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.005  111.  De-Bashan LE, Bashan Y, 2010, Immobilized Microalgae for
           98.  Sibilla S, Godfrey M, Brewer S, et al., 2015, An Overview   Removing Pollutants: Review of Practical Aspects. Bioresour
               of  the  Beneficial  Effects  of  Hydrolysed  Collagen  as  a   Technol, 101:1611–27.
               Nutraceutical on Skin Properties: Scientific Background and      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.043
               Clinical Studies. Open Nutraceutical J, 8:29–42.  112.  Ferro Y, Perullini M, Jobbagy M, et al., 2012, Development
           99.  Patino MG, Neiders ME, Andreana S, et al., 2002, Collagen:   of a Biosensor for Environmental  Monitoring  Based  on
               An Overview. Implant Dent, 11:280–5.                Microalgae  Immobilized  In  Silica  Hydrogels.  Sensors
               https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200207000-00014    (Basel), 12:16879–91.
           100.  Nimni ME, 1980, The Molecular Organization of Collagen      https://doi.org/10.3390/s121216879
               and its Role in Determining the Biophysical Properties of the   113.  Malik S, Hagopian J, Mohite S, et al., 2020, Robotic Extrusion
               Connective Tissues. Biorheology, 17:51–82.          of Algae-laden Hydrogels for Large-scale Applications. Glob
               https://doi.org/10.3233/bir-1980-171-210            Chall, 4:1900064.
           101.  Kim YS, Majid M, Melchiorri AJ, et al., 2019, Applications      https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201900064
               of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix in Bone and Cartilage   114.  Zhao S, Guo C, Kumarasena A, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of
               Tissue Engineering. Bioeng Transl Med, 4:83–95.     Functional  Microalgal Silk Structures for Environmental
           102.  Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM, 2010, The Extracellular   Applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5:4808–16.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       201
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214