Page 22 - IJB-8-4

Silk Fibroin and Calcium Phosphate 3D Scaffolds Promote in vitro Osteogenesis
Reconstituted Silk. Biomacromolecules, 10:2724–8. Engineering Applications. Nanomedicine, 8:359–78.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bm900452u https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.118
41. Hu X, Kaplan D, Cebe P, 2006, Determining Beta-sheet 48. Zhang Y, Wu C, Friis T, et al., 2010, The Osteogenic
Crystallinity in Fibrous Proteins by Thermal Analysis and Properties of CaP/Silk Composite Scaffolds. Biomaterials,
Infrared Spectroscopy. Macromolecules, 39:6161–70. 31:2848–56.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0610109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.049
42. Horan RL, Antle K, Collette AL, et al., 2005, In Vitro 49. Marsh RE, Corey RB, Pauling L, 1955, An Investigation of
Degradation of Silk Fibroin. Biomaterials, 26:3385–93. the Structure of Silk Fibroin. Biochim Biophys Acta, 16:1–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3002(55)90178-5
43. He GP, Pan XY, Liu X, et al., 2020, HIF-1 Alpha-Mediated 50. Tamada Y, 2005, New Process to Form a Silk Fibroin Porous
Mitophagy Determines ZnO Nanoparticle-Induced Human 3-D Structure. Biomacromolecules, 6:3100–6.
Osteosarcoma Cell Death both In Vitro and In Vivo. ACS Appl https://doi.org/.1021/bm050431f
Mater Interf, 12:48296–309. 51. Bertassoni LE, Cardoso JC, Manoharan V, et al., 2014,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c12139 Direct-write Bioprinting of Cell-laden Methacrylated Gelatin
44. Mao Z, Bi X, Ye F, et al., 2020, Controlled Cryogelation and Hydrogels. Biofabrication, 6:024105.
Catalytic Cross-Linking Yields Highly Elastic and Robust https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105
Silk Fibroin Scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 6:4512–22. 52. Morris ER, Rees DA, Thom D, et al., 1978, Chiroptical and
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0075 Stoichiometric Evidence of a Specific, Primary Dimerisation
45. Kasoju N, Hawkins N, Pop-Georgievski O, et al., 2016, Silk Process in Alginate Gelation. Carbohydr Res, 66:145–54.
Fibroin Gelation via Non-solvent Induced Phase Separation. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(00)83247-4
Biomater Sci, 4:460–73. 53. Ming J, Jiang Z, Wang P, et al., 2015, Silk Fibroin/Sodium
https://doi.org/10.1039/c5bm00471c Alginate Fibrous Hydrogels Regulated Hydroxyapatite
46. Bi X, Li L, Mao Z, et al., 2020, The Effects of Silk Layer-by-layer Crystal Growth. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 51:287–93.
Surface Modification on the Mechanical and Structural Retention https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.014
of Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds. Biomater Sci, 8:4026–38. 54. Wu JW, Liu MJ, Wang L, et al., 2020, Influence of Silk
https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00448k Fibroin/Sodium Alginate Coatings on the Mineralization of
47. Yan LP, Silva-Correia J, Correia C, et al., 2013, Bioactive Silk Fibroin Fiber Artificial Ligament Prototypes. Text Res J,
Macro/Micro Porous Silk Fibroin/Nano-Sized Calcium 90:1590–601.
Phosphate Scaffolds with Potential for Bone-Tissue- https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517519898156

Publisher’s note
Whioce Publishing remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations.

14 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4