Page 20 - IJB-8-4
P. 20

Silk Fibroin and Calcium Phosphate 3D Scaffolds Promote in vitro Osteogenesis
           Program  of  China  (No.  2018YFC1106600,  and  No.   7.   Sears NA, Seshadri DR, Dhavalikar PS, et al., 2016, A Review
           2017YFC1105000), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Golden      of Three-Dimensional Printing in Tissue Engineering. Tissue
           Seeds Foundation (CYJZ202148), and the Capital Health   Eng Part B Rev, 22:298–310.
           Research  and  Development  of  Special  2020-1-4092      https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0464
           Program.
                                                               8.   Yan  Q,  Dong  H,  Su  J, et al.,  2018,  A  Review  of
           Conflict of interest                                    3D  Printing  Technology  for  Medical  Applications.

           The authors declare that they have no known competing   Engineering, 4:729–42.
           financial  interests  or  personal  relationships  that  could      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021
           have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.  9.   Gillispie  G,  Prim  P,  Copus  J, et al.,  2020,  Assessment
                                                                   Methodologies  for  Extrusion-based  Bioink  Printability.
           Author contributions                                    Biofabrication, 12:022003.

           Conceptualization: Juan Guan and Yuzeng Liu             https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d
           Formal analysis: Xingxing Cai, Juan Guan, Yuzeng Liu,   10.  Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future
              Hongyi Lu, Zhinan Mao, Yan Li, Hongbo Guo, and       Perspectives  in  Extrusion-based  Bioprinting.  Biomaterials,
              Yong Hai                                             76:321–43.
           Investigation: Ruya Shi, Xingxing Cai, and Guanping He     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
           Methodology: Ruya Shi and Xingxing Cai
           Supervision: Juan Guan and Yuzeng Liu               11.  Jang  TS,  Jung  HD,  Pan  HM,  et al.,  2018,  3D  Printing
           Writing – original draft: Ruya Shi and Juan Guan,       of  Hydrogel  Composite  Systems:  Recent  Advances  in
           Writing – review and editing: Yuzeng Liu, Hongyi Lu,    Technology for Tissue Engineering. Int J Bioprint, 4:126.
              Zhinan Mao, Yan Li, Hongbo Guo, and Yong Hai.        https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.v4i1.126
           References                                          12.  Jo  YY,  Kim  SG,  Kwon  KJ, et al.,  2017,  Silk  Fibroin-
                                                                   Alginate-Hydroxyapatite Composite Particles in Bone Tissue
           1.   Wu  CY,  Lee  HS,  Tsai  CF, et al.,  2022,  Secular  Trends  in   Engineering Applications In Vivo. Int J Mol Sci, 18:858.
               the  Incidence  of  Fracture  Hospitalization  between  2000      https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040858
               and  2015  among  the  Middle-aged  and  Elderly  Persons  in   13.  Mu  X,  Agostinacchio  F,  Xiang  N, et al.,  2021,  Recent
               Taiwan: A Nationwide Register-based Cohort Study. Bone,   Advances  in  3D  Printing  with  Protein-based  Inks.  Prog
               154:116250.                                         Polym Sci, 115:101375.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2021.116250          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101375
           2.   Behzadi S, Luther GA, Harris MB, et al., 2017, Nanomedicine   14.  Demirtas  TT,  Irmak  G,  Gumusderelioglu  M,  2017,  A
               for  Safe  Healing  of  Bone  Trauma:  Opportunities  and   Bioprintable  Form  of  Chitosan  Hydrogel  for  Bone  Tissue
               Challenges. Biomaterials, 146:168–82.               Engineering. Biofabrication, 9:035003.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.005     https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7b1d
           3.   Bharadwaz A,  Jayasuriya AC,  2020,  Recent  Trends  in  the   15.  Salati  MA,  Khazai  J,  Tahmuri AM, et al.,  2020, Agarose-
               Application of Widely Used Natural and Synthetic Polymer   Based  Biomaterials:  Opportunities  and  Challenges  in
               Nanocomposites in Bone Tissue Regeneration. Mater Sci Eng   Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Polymers, 12:1150.
               C Mater Biol Appl, 110:110698.                      https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051150
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110698      16.  Agostinacchio  F,  Mu  X,  Dire  S, et al.,  2021,  In Situ  3D
           4.   Maia  FR,  Bastos  AR,  Oliveira  JM, et al.,  2022,  Recent   Printing:  Opportunities  with  Silk  Inks.  Trends Biotechnol,
               Approaches  towards  Bone  Tissue  Engineering.  Bone,   39:719–30.
               154:116256.                                         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.11.003
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2021.116256      17.  Perrone GS, Leisk GG, Lo TJ, et al., 2014, The Use of Silk-
           5.   Bose  S,  Ke  D,  Sahasrabudhe  H, et  al.,  2018,  Additive   based Devices for Fracture Fixation. Nat Commun, 5:3385.
               manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog Mater Sci, 93:45–111.     https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4385
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003   18.  Zhao Y, Zhu ZS, Guan J, et al., 2021, Processing, Mechanical
           6.   Yang Y, Wang G, Liang H, et al., 2019, Additive Manufacturing   Properties and Bio-applications of Silk Fibroin-based High-
               of Bone Scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 5:148.           strength Hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 125:57–71.
               https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.v5i1.148               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.018

           12                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25