Page 185 - IJB-9-1
P. 185

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     PEEK skull implant in cranioplasty



























            Figure 4. Clinical implantation and postoperative effect of FFF-fabricated PEEK skull prosthesis. (A,B) During the operation, the titanium was re-
            placed with an FFF-fabricated PEEK skull implant. The protruding part of the titanium could be observed (blue arrow) and was resolved after switching to
            the PEEK implant, and the PEEK implant was fixed to the skull using titanium nails. (C,D) The appearance of the patient’s forehead before (C) and after (D)
            the implantation of PEEK skull prosthesis. (E–H) A follow-up 3D reconstruction of the head CT after the cranioplasty reveals the positional relationship
            between the FFF-printed PEEK skull implant and the skull defects. The PEEK implant is indicated by red arrows.
            that the PEEK implant was more closely combined with the   and surgical resection, and the technique could alleviate
            skull, making the appearance anatomically symmetrical.   cognitive and functional deficits by reinstating the regular
                                                               cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and improving brain
               The PEEK implant was processed in surgical grade,       [1]
            including ultrasonic cleaning, ethylene oxide sterilization,   perfusion . The repair materials mainly include autologous
                                                               bone, polymethyl methacrylate, titanium mesh, PEEK,
            sterilizing using autoclave, and soaking with iodophor   and several other materials [3,14] . At present, titanium mesh
            prior  to  intracranial implantation.  The anesthesia  and   is  a  commonly  used  material  for  cranioplasty.  However,
            surgery were going well. We first separated and removed   titanium  mesh  has  several  limitations,  such  as  high
            the deformed titanium mesh, and then, the PEEK implant   thermal conductivity, easy formation of imaging artifacts
            made by 3D printing was placed. In the final step, we used   during medical examinations, and high susceptibility to
            the designed overlap to fix the PEEK implant directly on the   deformation by external force and implant exposure [3,15] .
            skull with titanium nails without using PEEK connectors,   The  patient  in  this  case  underwent  autologous  bone
            which can shorten the operation time as well as reduce   resection  and  titanium  mesh  cranioplasty  15  years  ago.
            the surgery costs, the risk of implant infection and related   In recent years, the skin of the patient’s left brow arch has
            complications (Figure 4A and B). The FFF-manufactured   thinned and a sinus tract has formed. The collapse of the
            PEEK skull implant was successfully implanted with a well   left forehead and the skin sinus significantly affected his
            precise anatomic and esthetic reconstruction (Figure 4C   quality of life. This performance is consistent with previous
            and D). A subgaleal drainage tube was placed at the end   findings by Singh et al. .
                                                                                 [16]
            of the operation,  and the patient woke  up after  surgery.
            Except for intraoperative antibiotics, no antibiotics were   PEEK materials are widely used in medical fields, such
            used during the perioperative period, and the head wounds   as maxillofacial surgery for midfacial skull reconstruction,
            were routinely disinfected in the ward. There were no   dental implantology, joint replacement, ophthalmology for
            symptoms of fever or wound infection during the hospital   fabrication of artificial corneas, long bone replacement,
            stay. The 3D reconstruction of head CT was re-examined   spine surgery for spinal stability reconstruction, and
            before discharge (Figure 4E–H).                    intervertebral disk reconstruction replacement [17-19] . The
                                                               application of PEEK material for cranioplasty was first
                                                                            [20]
            3. Discussion                                      reported in 2007 ; it has been lauded as a potential material
                                                               in surgery because of its prominent characteristics, such as
            We present here the first reported case of cranioplasty   good biocompatibility, radiolucency, toughness, biological
            with FFF-fabricated PEEK material. Cranioplasty is a   inertness, and other characteristics that meet the needs of
            mature technique, which is mainly used for skull defects   the human body and surgeons [5,21,22] . Recent meta-analysis
            caused by various reasons, such as trauma, tumor invasion,   results show that using PEEK material for cranial repair has


            V                                              177                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.634
            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023)
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190