Page 205 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting of tissue with carbon nanomaterials

77. Li H, Song SI, Song GY, et al., 2014, Non-covalently 92. Kaushik SN, Kim B, Walma AM, et al., 2016, Biomimetic
functionalized carbon nanostructures for synthesizing microenvironments for regenerative endodontics. Biomater
carbon-based hybrid nanomaterials. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, Res, 20:14.
14:1425–1440.
93. Bhattacharyya A, Janarthanan G, Noh I, 2021, Nano-
78. Adorinni S, Rozhin P, Marchesan S, 2021, Smart hydrogels biomaterials for designing functional bioinks towards
meet carbon nanomaterials for new frontiers in medicine. complex tissue and organ regeneration in 3D bioprinting.
Biomedicines, 9:570. Addit Manuf, 37:101639.
79. Simon J, Flahaut E, Golzio M. 2019, Overview of carbon 94. Liu X, Miller AL, Park S, et al., 2019, Two-dimensional black
nanotubes for biomedical applications. Materials, 12:624. phosphorus and graphene oxide nanosheets synergistically
enhance cell proliferation and osteogenesis on 3D printed
80. Debnath SK, Srivastava R. 2021, Drug delivery with carbon- scaffolds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11:23558–23572.
based nanomaterials as versatile nanocarriers: Progress and
prospects. Front Nanotechnol, 3:644564. 95. Olate-Moya F, Arens L, Wilhelm M, et al., 2020,
Chondroinductive alginate-based hydrogels having
81. Luo X, Matranga C, Tan S, et al., 2011, Carbon nanotube
nanoreservior for controlled release of anti-inflammatory graphene oxide for 3D printed scaffold fabrication. ACS
dexamethasone. Biomaterials, 32:6316–6323. Appl Mater Interfaces, 12:4343–4357.
96. Bordoni M, Karabulut E, Kuzmenko V, et al., 2020,
82. Chae SY, Shin MC, Jeon S, et al., 2021, Simple route to 3D printed conductive nanocellulose scaffolds for the
the complexation of lutein with reduced graphene oxide differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells. Cells, 9:682.
nanocarriers and antioxidant protection against blue light.
Int J Nanomed, 16:6843–6860. 97. Janarthanan G, Lee S, Noh I, 2021, 3D printing of
bioinspired alginate-albumin based instant gel ink with
83. Yin F, Hu K, Chen Y, et al., 2017, SiRNA delivery with
PEGylated graphene oxide nanosheets for combined electroconductivity and its expansion to direct four-axis
photothermal and genetherapy for pancreatic cancer. printing of hollow porous tubular constructs without
Theranostics, 7:1133–1148. supporting materials. Adv Funct Mater, 31:2104441.
98. Cui H, Yu Y, Li X, et al., 2019, Direct 3D printing of a tough
84. Chen H, Huang J, Fam DWH, et al., 2016, Horizontally hydrogel incorporated with carbon nanotubes for bone
aligned carbon nanotube based biosensors for protein regeneration. J Mater Chem B, 7:7207–7217.
detection. Bioengineering, 3:23.
99. Lee SJ, Zhu W, Nowicki M, et al., 2018, 3D printing nano
85. Ojeda I, Barrejón M, Arellano LM, et al., 2015, Grafted-
double walled carbon nanotubes as electrochemical conductive multi-walled carbon nanotube scaffolds for
platforms for immobilization of antibodies using a nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng, 15:016018.
metallic-complex chelating polymer: Application to the 100. Li L, Qin S, Peng J, et al., 2020, Engineering gelatin-based
determination of adiponectin cytokine in serum, Biosens alginate/carbon nanotubes blend bioink for direct 3D printing
Bioelectron, 74:24–29. of vessel constructs. Int J Biol Macromol, 145:262–271.
86. Lee JH, Lee Y, Shin YC, et al., 2016, In situ forming gelatin/ 101. Liu X, George MN, Park S, et al., 2020, 3D-printed scaffolds
graphene oxide hydrogels for facilitated C2C12 myoblast with carbon nanotubes for bone tissue engineering: Fast and
differentiation. Appl Spectrosc Rev, 51:527–539. homogeneous one-step functionalization. Acta Biomater,
111:129–140.
87. Ravanbakhsh H, Bao G, Mongeau L, 2020, Carbon
nanotubes promote cell migration in hydrogels. Sci Rep, 10: 102. Serafin A, Murphy C, Rubio MC, et al., 2021, Printable
2543. alginate/gelatin hydrogel reinforced with carbon nanofibers
as electrically conductive scaffolds for tissue engineering.
88. Jo H, Sim M, Semin K, et al., 2016, Electrically conductive Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 122:111927.
graphene/polyacrylamide hydrogels produced by mild
chemical reduction for enhanced myoblast growth and 103. Bilge S, Ergene E, Talak E, et al., 2021, Recycled algae-based
differentiation. Acta Biomater, 48; 100–109. carbon materials as electroconductive 3D printed skeletal
muscle tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med,
89. Li H, Tan C, Li L, 2018, Review of 3D printable hydrogels
and constructs. Mater Des, 159:20–38. 32:73.
104. Huang CT, Kumar Shrestha L, Ariga K, et al., 2017, A
90. Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW, et al., 2018, A definition graphene-polyurethane composite hydrogel as a potential
of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. bioink for 3D bioprinting and differentiation of neural stem
Biofabrication, 11:013001.
cells. J Mater Chem B, 5:8854–8864.
91. Schuurman W, Khristov V, Pot MW, et al., 2011, Bioprinting 105. Ajiteru O, Sultan MT, Lee YJ, et al., 2020, A 3D printable
of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical electroconductive biocomposite bioink based on silk fibroin-
properties. Biofabrication, 3:021001. conjugated graphene oxide. Nano Lett, 20:6873–6883.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 197 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.635