Page 202 - IJB-9-1
P. 202

International Journal of Bioprinting                          3D bioprinting of tissue with carbon nanomaterials



            coming years, researchers should employ the underutilized   Writing – review & editing: Suck Won Hong, Hojae Bae,
            bioprinters to fabricate tissue constructs.           Bongju Kim, Yu-Shik Hwang
               (iv) Several researchers have utilized encapsulated   Conceptualization & revision: Jae Min Cha, Dong-Wook Han
            CFNs, while some others have used bare nanomaterials.   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            As the stabilization of nanoparticles plays a crucial role
            in biocompatibility, a comparative study employing   Not applicable.
            encapsulated and non-encapsulated CFNs-containing
            printable gels should be conducted.                Consent for publication
               (v) Apart from electrochemical properties, CFNs   Not applicable.
            have been used as fillers to improve the mechanical
            strength of printable gels. Researchers should attempt to   Availability of data
            prepare modified or doped CFNs  with reactive  groups   Not applicable.
            on the surface, which can crosslink polymers and express
            multifunctionality during application.             References
               (vi) Enhanced cell proliferation is the major biological
            outcome of the combined CFNs with printable gel. Despite   1.   Gopinathan J, Noh I, 2018, Recent trends in bioinks for 3D
            the studies that have been performed on molecular level,   printing. Biomater Res, 22:11.
            researchers have never discussed how nanomaterials   2.   Cha M, Jin YZ, Park JW,  et al., 2021, Three-dimensional
            interact among themselves and with the cells in the tissue   printed polylactic acid scaffold integrated with BMP-2 laden
            construct after fabrication. A detailed analysis of this would   hydrogel for precise bone regeneration. Biomater Res, 25:35.
            assist nanotechnologists in their venture of exploring more   3.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and
            about CFNs-printable gels.                            organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–785.
               We anticipate that researchers with interdisciplinary   4.   Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RMD, et al., 2016, Designing
            backgrounds will advance the field of TE and regenerative   biomaterials for 3D printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2:1679–
            medicine using CFNs-containing printable gels by      1693.
            considering the aforementioned problems and suggestions.  5.   Kang MS, Kwon M, Lee SY, et al., 2022, In situ crosslinkable
                                                                  collagen-based hydrogels for 3D printing of dermis-mimetic
            Acknowledgments                                       constructs. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol, 11:045014.

            None.                                              6.   Kang MS, Kwon M, Lee SH, et al., 2022, 3D printing of skin
                                                                  equivalents with hair follicle structures and epidermal-
            Funding                                               papillary-dermal layers using gelatin/hyaluronic acid
                                                                  hydrogels. Chem Asian J, 17: e202200620.
            This research was supported by the Basic Science   7.   Ozbolat IT, Peng W, Ozbolat V, 2016, Application areas of
            Research Program through the National Research        3D bioprinting. Drug Discov Today, 21:1257–1271.
            Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry
            of Education (No. 2022R1I1A1A01064416), the NRF    8.   Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for skin
            grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (Nos.    tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives. J Tissue
            2021R1A2C2006013 and 2020R1F1A1072695), and the       Eng, 12:20417314211028574.
            Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea, under   9.   Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H, et al., 2020, Development of 3D bioprinting:
            the “Regional Innovation Cluster Development Program   From printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J
            (R&D, P0015342)” supervised by the Korea Institute for   Pharm Sci, 15:529–557.
            Advancement of Technology (KIAT).                  10.  Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A comprehensive
                                                                  review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and
            Conflict of interest                                  future. Biomaterials, 102:20–42.

            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.      11.  Derby B, 2010, Inkjet printing of functional and structural
                                                                  materials: Fluid property requirements, feature stability, and
            Author contributions                                  resolution. Annu Rev Mater Res, 40:395–414.
                                                               12.  Nakamura M, Kobayashi A, Takagi F,  et al., 2005,
            Writing – original draft: Iruthayapandi Selestin Raja, Moon   Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed
               Sung Kang                                          seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng, 11:1658–1666.




            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        194                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.635
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207