Page 251 - IJB-9-1
P. 251

International Journal of Bioprinting                         3D printing of smart constructs for precise medicine



            A                                             C





            B
                                                          D









            E                                              F













            G                         H                        I












            Figure 6. Potential applications of stimuli-responsive bioinks for tissue regeneration and repair. (A) AA-MA tube responsiveness in immersed solutions
            and tube diameters according to printing speed. (B) Representative fluorescent images of cell-laden AA-MA tubes for 7 days: fluorescence images in green
            (upper row) representing live cells, fluorescence images in red (middle row) showing dead cells within self-folded tubes, and overlays of green and red
            fluorescence images (lower row) with live cells (orange) and dead cells (red) [152] . (Figure A and B reproduced with permission from Kirillova et al. [152] ;
            copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons). (C) Alteration in the fabricated 3D structure by applying a magnetic field; the originally printed shape was returned
            when the magnetic field was removed (reproduced with permission from Ko et al. [113] ; copyright 2020, Elsevier). (D) Images showing the injected bioink
            through a syringe to create self-supporting structure. (E) The images of magnetic ferrofluids, extrusion filament, and 3D-fabricated structure with magnetic-
            responsive behavior. (F) Micro-CT images after implantation on 4 weeks and 8 weeks. (Figure D, E, and F reproduced with permission from Guo et al. [114] ;
            copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons). (G) Working principle showing drug-release through UV/green light stimulations. (H) Micropatterned patch by
            3D bioprinting process. (I) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of skin tissue collected after 28 days to show the wound healing process. (Figures G, H, and I
            reproduced with permission from Siebert et al. [116] ; copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons).
            4.2. Drug delivery for therapy of disease          such as pH and biomolecule concentration. Therefore,

            Conventional delivery systems require frequent and high-  3D-bioprinted  constructs  with  stimuli-responsive
            dose administration for success [118] . However, the adverse   biomaterials are under development as smart drug
            effects could badly influence the body and decrease the drug   delivery systems. Wang et al. [119]  proposed a hybrid bioink
            efficacy. In line with precision medicine, an optimal drug   with shape memory for drug delivery. Sodium alginate
            delivery system should release pre-planned drugs under   and Pluronic F127 diacrylate macromers (F127DA) were
            harsh in vivo environmental conditions. Stimuli-responsive   mixed to formulate shape-memory hydrogels (SMHs).
            biomaterials have the potential to change their form in   3D printing was utilized as an effective tool to control the
            response  to  external  stimuli  and  changes  in  variables,   internal structure of the shape memory hydrogels. This


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        243                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.638
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256