Page 324 - IJB-9-1
P. 324

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   Sterilization effect on 3D printed inks


































            Figure 7. FTIR spectra for GEL-SA samples as a function of sterilization method (CONTROL, UV, FILT, and AUTO) and media (DMEM and PBS) used.
            Amide I and amide II bands are marked by dotted lines.

            Table 3. Secondary structure percentage (%) determined by amide I band deconvolution for GEL-SA samples as a function of
            sterilization methods (CONTROL, UV, FILT, and AUTO) and media (DMEM and PBS) used.

             Protein conformation               DMEM                                     PBS
                                 CONTROL       UV    FILT    AUTO        CONTROL       UV    FILT    AUTO
             β-sheet a           39.9          41.7  47.6    47.3        51.4          49.3  55.3    52.8
             α-helix and random coil  36.7     36.5  31.6    30.5        31.2          30.5  25.2    25.7
             β-turns             18.8          17.1  15.3    17.1        13.6          16.8  17.3    16.9
             β-sheet b             4.6           4.7    5.5    5.1         3.8           3.4    4.2    4.6
            a Inter-antiparallel and intra-parallel;  intra-antiparallel.
                                   b
            CONTROL: non-sterilized inks; UV: UV-sterilized inks; FILT: filtered inks; AUTO: autoclaved inks
            secondary structure in GEL . Amide I region contains   with the small inorganic molecules dissolved in the media
                                   [51]
            many different vibrational frequencies in function of   or with alginate,  can be  formed, leading to changes  in
            secondary structures: intra-parallel and inter-antiparallel   protein secondary structure and therefore, to different flow
            β-sheet (1610–1642 cm ), random coil and α-helix (1645-  behavior, as shown by rheological results.
                              −1
            1660 cm ), β-turn (1660-1686 cm ), and intra antiparallel
                  −1
                                       −1
            β-sheet (1674–1695 cm )  . As can be seen in Table 3,   4. Conclusion
                               −1 [51–53]
            β-sheet conformation was predominant in PBS, while this   Rheological results showed that sterilization processes
            conformation was predominant only for FILT and AUTO   change the rheological behavior of protein-based inks.
            samples in DMEM media. Regarding the sterilization   While AUTO samples in all media and FILT samples
            processes, the prevalence of α-helix structure was greater   in water behaved as Newtonian fluids, UV samples
            for CONTROL and UV samples. This is in accordance with   showed shear thinning behavior, which was favorable
            a higher dimensional stability, as found in UV samples and   for 3D-printing processes. These differences in the
            shown in Figure 7.                                 rheological properties of the inks were evidenced in the

               These differences in protein conformations may be   3D-printing process. In particular, the samples sterilized
            due to a partial denaturation of the protein, probably due   by  UV  radiation  were  the  ones  with  the  best  preserved
            to  the  conditions  used  in  FILT and AUTO  sterilization   shape and size once they were deposited on the 3D
            processes .  Once  the  protein  is  unfolded,  new  bonds,   printer platform. These results were related to the changes
                   [54]
            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        316                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.645
   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329