Page 320 - IJB-9-1
P. 320

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   Sterilization effect on 3D printed inks


































            Figure 2. Shear viscosity curves fitted to Cross model (represented by lines) for GEL-SA samples as a function of the sterilization method (CONTROL, UV,
            FILT, and AUTO) in different media: (A) DMEM, (B) PBS, and (C) water.

            assuming the slope of fitted curve (-m) as a power law   to ensure data reproducibility. To obtain second derivative
            region (n−1).                                      spectra of amide I, data were smoothed using Savitzky-
                                                               Golay function, and curve fitting was performed via peak
               To obtain storage modulus (G'), loss modulus (G") and
            loss  tangent  (tanδ),  frequency  sweeps  were  carried  out   analysis using OriginPro 2021 software.
            from 0.05 to 100 Hz.
                                                               3. Results
            2.4. 3D printing                                   3.1. Rheological Evaluation
            DomoBIO 2A bioprinter (Domotek, Spain) equipped with   Rheological properties of hydrogels are one of the
            heated syringe extruder and refrigerated platform was used   most important physical parameters to determine their
            for printing tests. The structure was designed with Solid Edge   printability [30,40] . As shown in  Figure 2, non-sterilized
            Student (Siemens, Germany). Printed scaffolds had cylinder   solutions exhibited shear thinning behavior in all media,
            shape with a diameter of 21 mm and a height of 0.6 mm. Cura   since the viscosity decreased with shear rate . However,
                                                                                                   [41]
            4.13.0 slicing software (Ultimaker, Netherlands) was used   sterilization processes influenced the rheological behavior
            for slicing the object. All samples were loaded into 10 mL   of the solutions. It is worth noting that non-sterilized and
            plastic syringes and heated at 35°C for 30 min before use. 3D   UV-sterilized samples showed a similar behavior with a
            printing was carried out at 37°C with 27 G (0.41 mm) conical   marked decrease of viscosity with shear rate. In contrast,
            plastic nozzles, and glass slides were used as deposition   this decrease was less noticeable for FILT and AUTO
            substrates. Layer height, layer width, infill line distance, and   samples, especially when the media was water, in which
            printing velocity were set up at 0.1 mm, 0.3 mm, 1.5 mm,   FILT and AUTO samples showed a Newtonian behavior.
            and 30 mm/s, respectively. Platform temperature and flow   Regarding the media employed, the differences observed
            index were optimized for each sample in order to improve   with  water  could  be  due  to  the  presence  of  inorganic
            the dimensional stability of the 3D-printed constructs.  salts in both DMEM and PBS media, which could lead
                                                               to crosslinking with calcium ions [42–44] . This phenomenon
            2.5. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy       was not observed in FILT and AUTO sterilized samples
            FTIR spectra were achieved using a Bruker Alpha-   probably due to the decrease in molecular weight caused
            II FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Spain), equipped with   by the sterilization treatment .
                                                                                      [21]
            platinum-ATR. A total of 32 scans were performed at
            4 cm  resolution, and all the samples were analyzed in the   As can be seen in Figure 2, shear viscosity curves were
                −1
                                    −1
            spectral range of 4000–500 cm . Tests were repeated twice   well-fitted to Cross model, and this model parameters are
            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        312                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.645
   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325