Page 315 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Error assessment and correction

12. Peng W, Datta P, Ayan B, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting for 23. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019, 3D bioprinting
drug discovery and development in pharmaceutics. Acta of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart.
Biomater, 57: 26–46. Science (80-. ), 365(6452): 482–487.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.025 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9051
13. Daly AC, Prendergast ME, Hughes AJ, et al., 2021, 24. Bertassoni LE, Cardoso JC, Manoharan V, et al., 2014,
Bioprinting for the biologist. Cell, 184(1): 18–32. Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin
hydrogels. Biofabrication, 6(2): 024105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.002
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105
14. Rastogi P, Kandasubramanian B, 2019, Review of alginate-
based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue 25. Armstrong AA, Alleyne AG, Wagoner Johnson AJ, 2020, 1D
engineering. Biofabrication, 11(4): 042001. and 2D error assessment and correction for extrusion-based
bioprinting using process sensing and control strategies.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
Biofabrication, 12(4): 045023.
15. Jose RR, Rodriguez MJ, Dixon TA, et al., 2016, Evolution https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba8ee
of bioinks and additive manufacturing technologies for 3D
bioprinting. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2(10): 1662–1678. 26. Armstrong AA, Pfeil A, Alleyne AG, et al., 2021, Process
monitoring and control strategies in extrusion-based
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00088 bioprinting to fabricate spatially graded structures.
16. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances and Bioprinting, 21(September 2020): e00126.
future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00126
Biomaterials, 76: 321–343.
27. Liu C, Liu J, Yang C, et al., 2022, Computer vision-aided
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 2D error assessment and correction for helix bioprinting.
17. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al., 2017, Proposal to assess Int J Bioprinting, 8(2): 174–186.
printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i2.547
and evaluation of rheological properties governing
bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9(4): 044107. 28. Axpe E, Oyen ML, 2016, Applications of alginate-based
bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci, 17(12): 1976.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121976
18. Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue Z, et al., 2013, Bio-ink properties
and printability for extrusion printing living cells. Biomater 29. Wang B, Wan Y, Zheng Y, et al., 2019, Alginate-based
Sci, 1(7): 763–773. composites for environmental applications: A critical review.
Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 49(4): 318–356.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm00012e
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1547621
19. Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Puster U, et al., Controlling
shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance 30. Rastogi P, Kandasubramanian B, 2019, Review of alginate-
printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue
Mater, 5(3): 326–333. engineering. Biofabrication, 11(4): 042001.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500677 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
20. Lee JM, Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, Resolution and shape in 31. Jain D, Bar-Shalom D, 2014, Alginate drug delivery systems:
bioprinting: Strategizing towards complex tissue and organ Application in context of pharmaceutical and biomedical
printing. Appl Phys Rev, 6(1): 011307. research. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 40(12): 1576–1584.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053909 https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2014.917657
32. AbdelAllah NH, Gaber Y, Rashed ME, et al., 2020,
21. Suntornnond R, Tan EYS, An J, et al., 2016, A mathematical
model on the resolution of extrusion bioprinting for the Alginate-coated chitosan nanoparticles act as effective
development of new bioinks. Materials (Basel), 9(9): 756. adjuvant for hepatitis A vaccine in mice. Int J Biol
Macromol, 152: 904–912.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090756
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.287
22. Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, et al., 2015, A simple and high-
resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using 33. Ghosh M, Halperin-Sternfeld M, Grinberg I, et al., 2019,
visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication, 7(4): 45009. Injectable alginate-peptide composite hydrogel as a scaffold
for bone tissue regeneration. Nanomaterials, 9(4): 497.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040497

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 307 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.644
V