Page 314 - IJB-9-1
P. 314

International Journal of Bioprinting                                      Error assessment and correction



            to an acceptable range. This method showed a significant   References
            reduction effect for high error areas. More importantly, the
            error of the correction results was in a normal distribution   1.   Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al., 2020, OPTN/SRTR
            instead of a random distribution, thus proving that this   2018 annual data report: Kidney. Am J Transplant, 20(s1):
            method based on computer vision is universal for different   20–130.
            locations.                                            https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15672
               This research has demonstrated a method for     2.   Abouna GM,  2008, Organ shortage  crisis: Problems and
            effectively detecting defects and correcting errors in the   possible solutions. Transplant Proc, 40(1): 34–38.
            field of bioprinting. In fact, this method is also suitable   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.067
            for improving the resolution of printing other organs. We
            hope that bioprinting can further advance and create new   3.   Croome KP, Lee DD, Keaveny AP, et al., 2017, Noneligible
            opportunities for regenerative medicine.              donors as a strategy to decrease the organ shortage. Am J
                                                                  Transplant, 17(6): 1649–1655.
            Acknowledgments                                       https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14163
            This researchers thank the National Natural Science   4.   Bastani B, 2020, The present and future of transplant organ
                                                                  shortage: Some potential remedies. J Nephrol, 33(2): 277–288.
            Foundation of China, Shanghai Science and Technology
            Commission, Guangxi Science and Technology Program,   https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-019-00634-x
            and Guangxi Key R&D Project.                       5.   Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF,  et al., 2018, 3D
                                                                  bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine.
            Funding                                               Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132: 296–332.
            National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
            Nos.: 51831011, 52011530181), Shanghai Science and   6.   Pedde RD, Mirani B, Navaei A,  et al., 2017, Emerging
            Technology Commission (Grant No.: 20S31900100),       biofabrication strategies for engineering complex tissue
            Guangxi Science and Technology Program (Guike Jizi    constructs. Adv Mater, 29(19): 1–27.
            [2020]  No.  198),  and  Guangxi  Key  R&D  Project  (Guike   https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606061
            AB18050008).
                                                               7.   van Pel DM, Harada K, Song D,  et al., 2018, Modelling
            Author contributions                                  glioma invasion using 3D bioprinting and scaffold-free 3D
                                                                  culture. J Cell Commun Signal, 12(4): 723–730.
            Conceptualization: Changxi Liu, Liqiang Wang          https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-018-0469-z
            Data curation: Changxi Liu, Chengliang Yang, Jia Liu
            Funding acquisition: Yujin Tang, Zhengjie Lin, Long Li,    8.   Liu C, Yang C, Liu J,  et al., 2022, Medical high-entropy
               Hai Liang                                          alloy: Outstanding mechanical properties and superb
            Methodology: Changxi Liu, Weijie Lu                   biological compatibility.  Frontiers in Bioengineering and
            Writing – original draft: Changxi Liu, Jia Liu, Yujin Tang,   Biotechnology, 1436.
               Hai Liang, Weijie Lu, Liqiang Wang                 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.952536
            Writing – review & editing: Changxi Liu, Jia Liu, Yujin   9.   Yu F, Choudhury D, 2019, Microfluidic bioprinting for organ-
               Tang, Hai Liang, Weijie Lu, Liqiang Wang           on-a-chip models. Drug Discov Today, 24(6): 1248–1257.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.03.025
            Ethics approval and consent to participate
                                                               10.  Li S, Tian X, Fan J, et al., 2019, Chitosans for tissue repair and
            Not applicable.                                       organ three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Micromachines,
                                                                  10(11): 765.
            Consent for publication
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10110765
            Not applicable.
                                                               11.  Tseng H, Gage JA, Shen T, et al., 2015, A spheroid toxicity
                                                                  assay using magnetic 3D bioprinting and real-time mobile
            Availability of data                                  device-based imaging. Sci Rep, 5: 1–11.
            Experimental data are measured and analyzed by computer.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13987






            V
            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023)  306                     https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.644
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319