Page 89 - IJB-9-1
P. 89

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Progress in bioprinting of bone


              The multipotency of stem cells makes them a popular   biologically active ions like strontium (Sr ) has been
                                                                                                   2+
            alternative to cell lines and primary bone cells. Numerous   reported to enhance bone formation [77,78] . In addition, as
            studies have been conducted on bone bioprinting using   an alkaloid component extracted from Chinese traditional
            MSCs, such as bone MSCs (BMSCs) and human nasal    medicines  such  as  astragalus  and  coptis,  berberine  also
            turbinate-derived MSCs (hTMSCs) . An intriguing    has an osteogenic  effect and  antibacterial properties .
                                          [56]
                                                                                                           [79]
            finding is that MSCs can be obtained from induced   Stiffer biomaterials also trigger higher MSC osteogenic
            pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can overcome the   differentiation as the mechanical properties of the
            problem of limited quantities of autologous MSCs .   biomaterial affect cellular activity . Moreover, it has been
                                                        [57]
                                                                                         [72]
            Furthermore, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are   reported that exogenous electrical stimulation can increase
            plenty in the human body and are surgically accessible,   mineralization . In short, using appropriate physical and
                                                                           [80]
            which makes them another striking source for       chemical cues, the stem cell activities, particularly the
            bioprinting . To support therapeutic revascularization in   osteogenesis, can be controlled and enhanced.
                     [13]
            bioprinted tissue, ECs [26,52,53] , endothelial progenitor cells
            (EPCs) , or endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs)    2.6. Mechanical enhancement
                  [58]
                                                        [59]
            have been cocultured with the above-mentioned cells [59-61] .  Constructs bioprinted using natural hydrogels have a
            2.5. Osteogenesis                                  low modulus of compression (<10 kPa) [74,81]  and degrade
                                                               rapidly, losing most of their structural integrity within a
            In principle, bioprinted bone should promote and facilitate   short-time . Despite the design of delicate gradients
                                                                       [82]
            the proliferation and osteogenesis of stem cells and   with  different  concentrations  of  GelMA  hydrogel,
            osteoprogenitor cells by the release of specific cytokines,   mechanical stability could not be maintained for more
            such as transforming growth factor (TGF-β), interferons,   than 21 days in culture as a result of the degradation of
            and  interleukins  (IL) [62,63] .  In  addition,  bioprinted  bone   GelMA . Furthermore, the polyP·Ca  coated alginate/
                                                                     [52]
                                                                                              2+
            should possess osteoinduction capabilities by depositing   gelatin construct lost its mechanical stability after a 5-day
            bone-related proteins (e.g., BMPs, insulin-like growth   culture . Young’s modulus (GPa) and tensile/compressive
                                                                    [75]
            factors, and fibroblast growth factor [FGFs]) [64-66] . Last   strength (MPa) of native bone are in some orders of
            but not least, the structure should provide a porous   magnitude higher than those of hydrogel-based bioinks. It
            microenvironment for the differentiation of bone cells,   is problematic to use hydrogel-only constructs in clinical
            facilitating the synthesis of minerals, and collagenous   applications, and thus, developing constructs with a high
            tissue .                                           and retainable mechanical strength is urgent.
                [67]
              Some of the above-mentioned studies have shown that   Blending mechanically strong particles within a
            stem cell differentiation is preserved in bioprinted bone,   hydrogel may provide some reinforcement to bioprinted
            and their osteogenic differentiation can be modulated by   constructs [51,74] . The compression modulus of cell-laden
            utilizing the right printing process, biomaterials, design,   constructs containing alginate, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA),
            and bioactive factors . The addition of BMP-2 and TGF-β   and HAp was 10.3 kPa, but this value dropped to 2.4  kPa
                            [68]
            usually results in greater osteogenic differentiation [69,70] . As   after 14 days of culture . An elastic modulus of 0.55  MPa
                                                                                 [83]
            to bioink materials, an alginate-based hydrogel supports   has been measured  for the bioprinted TCP-collagen
            the viability of MSCs and retains their osteogenic capacity   constructs , which was less than the elastic modulus of
                                                                       [84]
            in bioprinted bone . MeHA has also been demonstrated   trabecular bone (20 – 52 MPa) . Using silk fibroin/ionic-
                           [71]
                                                                                       [85]
            to trigger osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs in   doped  β-TCP, a multilayer structure has been prepared,
            bioprinted constructs without  exogenous osteogenic   which provided slightly enhanced mechanical properties
            factors . The GelMA scaffold was also demonstrated to   (static compression modulus of 0.66 MPa and dynamic
                 [72]
            induce mineralization of MG63 osteoblasts and primary   mechanical properties of 2.17 – 3.19 MPa) . Furthermore,
                                                                                                [86]
            normal  human  osteoblasts  (NHOst)  without  requiring   nanozirconium dioxide powder was blended in PCL, and
            any additional osteogenic factors . In addition, the HAp   Young’s modulus and compressive strength increased by
                                      [73]
            plays an important role in the osteogenic differentiation   ~0.4 and 0.5 times, respectively, as compared with the PCL-
            of preosteoblast cells in vitro . A surge of mineralization   [87]
                                   [74]
            in SaOS-2 cell-embedded hydrogel was observed on   only scaffold . In another case, bredigite was mixed with
                            2+
            overlaying polyP·Ca -complex to the bioprinted alginate/  nanosheets of graphene oxide which was reduced by bovine
            gelatin hydrogel . Furthermore, bone scaffolds that were   serum albumin, and the addition of reduced  graphene
                         [75]
                                                               oxide enhanced the mechanical properties of scaffolds .
                                                                                                         [88]
            composed of decellularized porcine bone had significantly
            enhanced osteogenic gene expression, without the use   For significant reinforcement of the mechanical
            of an osteogenic medium . Besides, the addition of   properties of bioprinted constructs, thermoplastics or
                                  [76]
            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         81                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94