Page 86 - IJB-9-1
P. 86

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Progress in bioprinting of bone


            of trabecular bone (metaphysis). Microscopically, bone   2. Consideration of bioprinting a bone
            lamella, which is composed of mineralized collagen fibers,
            exhibits a planar arrangement with a width of 3 – 7 μm .   The  conventional  tissue  engineering strategy  is  to
                                                        [4]
            In cortical bone, osteons (or Haversian systems) are formed   seed cells onto scaffolds, which can then direct cell
                                                               proliferation and differentiation into three-dimensional
            by concentric layers of lamellae wrapped around a central   (3D) functioning tissues and organs. Although significant
            canal. On the other hand, the arrangement of mineral
            platelets in the trabecular bone is different, in which the   success has been achieved in the past decades both in
                                                                                           [10]
                                                     [2]
            mineral platelets are aligned with the collagen fibers .  research and clinical applications , it is obvious that
                                                               complex 3D tissues require more precise multicellular
              Furthermore, lamellae, which are considered the basic   structures, which cannot be fulfilled by traditional
            building blocks of bone, contain mineralized collagen   methods. Bioprinting offers a controllable fabrication
            fibrils (~100 nm in diameter). Collagen type I (COL-I)   process, which allows precise spatial placement of
            is the primary organic component of the matrix, which   various biomaterials and/or cell types simultaneously
            is secreted by osteoblasts followed by self-assembling.   mimicking the target natural tissue or organ .
                                                                                                           [11]
            Apatite crystals distribute discretely along the collagen   Complementing the existing review articles about
            fibrils. The lamellae and collagen fibers of bone are   bioprinting and its applications [12-14] , this review focuses
            organized in a way that prevents crack propagation and   on 3D bioprinting of bone, which is rapidly advancing in
            increases  bone toughness .  As for  the composition of   the field of regenerative medicine. This article discusses
                                 [5]
            bone, hydroxyapatite (HAp, 60%) and collagen-I (20%)   the   up-to-date  progress in 3D  bioprinting technologies
            are the major substances. Besides, there are several types of   for bone reconstruction by integrating knowledge from
            impurities in bone, including sodium (Na ), magnesium   in vitro and in vivo studies. Bioprinting approaches and
                                              +
            (Mg ),  and  potassium  (K ),  as  well  as  proteins,  such   other major considerations are carefully evaluated, such as
                                  +
               2+
            as osteocalcin (OCN), osteonectin,  and sialoprotein .   bioprinting apparatus, biomaterials, bone vascularization,
                                                        [6]
            Osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteoclasts, and bone lining   cell source, differentiation factors, mechanical properties
            cells are the four types of cellular components of bone   and reinforcement, hypoxic environment, and dynamic
            that are embedded in the extracellular matrix (ECM).   culture.  This  review  outlines  the  latest  advancement  in
            Osteoblasts, the bone-forming cells, consist of 4 – 6% of   bioprinting of bone and aims to assist the researchers to
            the total number of bone cells. ECM is synthesized by   gain insights into the reconstruction of clinically relevant
            osteoblasts in a two-step process involving the deposition   bone tissues with appropriate mechanical properties and
            of organic matrix followed by mineralization . During   precisely regulated biological behaviors.
                                                  [7]
            the calcification process, osteoblasts transform into   In this review, studies based on conventional 3D
            osteocytes, which distribute in the ECM and act as stress   printing, in which acellular scaffolds are fabricated followed
            sensors in the bone. In some cases, osteoblasts stay on   by cell-seeding, are excluded from the study. Studies on the
            the top of new bone and protect the bone underneath,   topic of bone bioprinting, in which cellular components
            hence the term lining cells. A bone osteoclast is a very   are manipulated together with bioink deposition without
            large, multinucleate cell that absorbs bone matrix, in   subsequent  manual  cell-seeding  process,  are  carefully
            which function is critical in the maintenance, repair, and   selected and reviewed. From the viewpoint of the authors,
            remodeling of bone.
                                                               the selected studies are innovative in certain aspects such
              Bone plays an essential role in providing the body   as bioink preparation, bioprinting process, or construct
            with  mechanical  support.  Calcium  phosphate  provides   design and represent the state-of-the-art progress in
            mechanical durability and high resistance to compression   this field. When discussing about bone bioprinting, the
            of bone, whereas collagen is responsible for bone’s   following questions should be kept in mind (Figure 1):
            elasticity and resistance to tension and stretching. Young’s   (i)  What printing processes and structure designs
            modulus is approximately GPa for native bone, and tensile   can facilitate micro-/macroscale vascularization of
            and compressive strengths are approximately MPa, which   bioprinted bone?
            are determined by the location of the bone in the body   (ii)  What is the optimal bioink formula for derive
            or by the specific location within the bone. Compared   the greatest benefits from natural and synthetic
            with cancellous bone, cortical bone exhibits much higher   biomaterials?
            Young’s modulus (7 – 30 GPa vs. 50 – 500 MPa), tensile   (iii) What are the best combinations of cell types for bone
            strength (50 – 150 MPa vs. 1.2 – 20 MPa), compressive   bioprinting? When multiple cell types are loaded in the
            strength (167 – 193 MPa vs. 1.9 – 10 MPa), and strain to   bioink, how do they interact and promote osteogenesis
            failure (1 – 3% vs. 5 – 7%) in the longitudinal direction [8,9] .  of stem cells and the formation of vasculature?


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         78                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91