Page 101 - IJB-9-2
P. 101

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Holistic charge-based MEW scaffold model


            surfaces evolving with  z are always displayed together,   interfiber distance  ξ and the normalized polarization
            thereby constituting a series of surface representations (or   distance η, respectively. Specifically, an increment in ξ and
            a mode of energy surface evolution) that depict a complete   η helps to increase the observability of the local effect and
            jet deposition process.                            the  polarization  effect,  respectively.  Since  ξ  is  relatively
                                                               large (e.g., ξ = 15 in Figure 3) in Mode 1 and 2, the pore
            3.2.1. Energy surface evolution representation     structure is “seen” earlier by the incoming jet segment than
            It is now clear that each jet deposition process corresponds   the charge polarization of the structure. The equivalent
            to a specific mode of energy surface evolution.    physical scenario can be described as a uniformly charged
            A  concomitant  question that  arises  herein  is how  many   segment  that  is  now  approaching  a  uniformly  charged
            modes can be observed under different conditions typified   grid (Phase 2 in Figure 3A and F). The local effect due to
            by the previously defined dimensionless parameters.  the porous structure results in an additional topological
              To answer this question, it is helpful to fundamentally   change to the energy surface, which assumes an overall
            understand the way in which the topology of the energy   concave (Mode 1) or convex (Mode 2) surface with some
            surface is affected by parameters involved in the model.   local “ridges” (black lines in Figure 3C and magenta dashed
            These effects, namely, charge effects, are found to assume   curve in Figure 3E) or “grooves” (black lines in Figure 3H
            three forms, including the global effect, local effect, and   and magenta dashed curve in Figure 3J), respectively, at
            polarization effect. Specifically, the global effect is defined   prescribed locations.
            as the global energy variation (increase or decrease) from   As the deposition process further proceeds (i.e., z
            the center to the periphery of the scaffold. Next, the local   approximating unity), the charge polarization of the porous
            effect is defined as the local energy variation (increase or   structure is eventually “seen” by the incoming jet segment,
            decrease) from the locations prescribed by the toolpath   and the equivalent physical scenario is  schematized in
            (shortened as prescribed locations in later contents) to   Phase  3  in  Figure  3A  and  3F,  whereby  the  polarization
            their adjacent pores. Finally, the polarization effect is   effect is additionally considered. Correspondingly, an
            defined as the local energy decrease caused by the charge   additional topological change to the energy surface caused
            polarization within the incoming jet segment and the   by this polarization effect is observed represented by
            scaffold at prescribed locations.                  some significant narrow “grooves” at prescribed locations
              To get a better understanding of these three effects, two   (Figure 3D, magenta curve in Figure 3E and I, magenta
            modes,  namely,  Mode  1  and  Mode  2,  will  be  explained   solid curve in Figure 3J).
            in detail herein. The dimensionless parameters enabling   3.2.2. Formulation and evaluation of different modes
            Mode 1 and Mode 2 include α = 3, β = 3 (for Mode 1) or   of energy surface evolution
            0.1 (for Mode 2), ξ = 15, η = 1, and K = 1. The equivalent
            physical scenarios corresponding to Mode 1 and Mode 2 are   It should be noted that in Mode 1, wherein the scaffold is
            schematized in Figure 3A and F, respectively. In addition,   positively charged, the topological changes in the energy
            the corresponding energy surface evolution is shown in   surface caused by the local effect and polarization effect as
            Figure 3B–D and 3G–I, respectively. At the initial phase   illustrated in Phase 3 (Figure 3A) are antagonistic (i.e., at
            (Phase 1) of the deposition process, since the incoming jet   the prescribed locations as indicated by the black lines, the
            segment is considered far-field from the deposited fibers   local effect results in “ridges” while the polarization effect
            (i.e., z is large), the charge polarization in the incoming   results in grooves”) and thus are differentiable. However,
            jet segment is negligible. Moreover, the incoming jet   in Mode 2, wherein the scaffold is negatively charged and
            segment is unable to “see” the porous structure. This   for a typical range of ξ and η, the topological changes in the
            equivalent physical scenario can be depicted as a uniform   energy surface profile caused by the local and polarization
            positive charge segment approaching a uniform positively   effects are synergistic (i.e., both result in local “grooves” at
            or negatively charged plate (Phase 1 in Figure 3A and F),   prescribed locations), which makes them indifferentiable.
            and therefore, the global effect is the singular effect in   Based  on  the  analysis  in  Figure  3,  depending  on  the
            action. This singular global effect is reflected by a strictly   polarity of the net charges in the scaffold and their effect on
            concave (for Mode 1) or convex (for Mode 2) parabola   the topology of the energy surface, there are two types of
            (Figure 3B  and 3G) on the energy surface.         global effects (⊕/⊖) and local effects (⊕/⊖), respectively.

              As the deposition proceeds (i.e., z decreases), depending   Specifically, the global effect (⊕) results in a relatively high-
            on the dimensionless parameters, the local and polarization   energy state at the center of the scaffold compared to the
            effect arises sequentially on the energy surface, which   periphery, while the global effect (⊖) results in a relatively
            are observed to be primarily affected by the normalized   low-energy state at the center of the scaffold compared to


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2022)                         93                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.656
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106