Page 94 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Steam-sterilized and degradable FFF-printed PLA/PHA surgical guides

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1005-0 31. Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I, 2012, Accuracy of three different
25. Matheus DM, Gomes EA, Barcellos DC, et al., 2021, Linear types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant
dimensional accuracy of stereolithographic surgical guide placement: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 108: 181–188.
after chemistry and physics sterilization. J Stomatol Oral https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60145-0
Maxillofac Surg, 123: 510–513.
32. Widmann G, Berggren JP, Fischer B, et al., 2015, Accuracy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.11.006 of image-fusion stereolithographic guides: Mapping CT
26. Herschdorfer L, Negreiros WM, Gallucci GO, et al., 2021, data with three-dimensional optical surface scanning. Clin
Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD- Implant Dent Relat Res, 17 Suppl 2: e736–e744.
CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12313
printers: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 125: 905–910.
33. Sommacal B, Savic M, Filippi A, et al., 2018, Evaluation
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.017
of two 3D printers for guided implant surgery. Int J Oral
27. Sun Y, Ding Q, Tang L, et al., 2019, Accuracy of a chairside Maxillofac Implants, 33: 743–746.
fused deposition modeling 3D-printed single-tooth surgical
template for implant placement: An in vitro comparison with a https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6074
light cured template. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 47: 1216–1221. 34. Tallarico M, Lumbau AI, Park CJ, et al., 2021, In vitro
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.019 evaluation of bioburden, three-dimensional stability, and
accuracy of surgical templates without metallic sleeves after
28. Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, et al., 2019, In vivo routinely infection control activities. Clin Implant Dent Relat
accuracy of implant placement using a full digital planning Res, 23(3): 380–387.
modality and stereolithographic guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants, 34: 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12986
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6939 35. Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, et al.,
2018, Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided
29. Derksen W, Wismeijer D, Flügge T, et al., 2019, The accuracy
of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing
digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac
scanning. A prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Implants, 33: 101–115.
Res, 30: 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5556
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13514 36. El Kholy K, Janner SM, Schimmel M, et al., 2019, The
30. Gjelvold B, Mahmood DJ, Wennerberg A, 2019, Accuracy influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and
of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-
computed tomography-guided surgery. J Prosthet Dent, assisted implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21(1):
121: 498–503. 101–107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.009 https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12705

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 86 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.655