Page 89 - IJB-9-2
P. 89

International Journal of Bioprinting           Steam-sterilized and degradable FFF-printed PLA/PHA surgical guides



             A                                                 B


























                                                               D
             C



























            Figure 5. Four groups of four plots each are displayed. Each group shows a 3D plot of the deviation at the implant base from the site (upper left), the front
            (upper right), and the bottom (lower left). Deviation is color-coded. Values of all X-, Y-, and Z-axes and deviation are given in millimeter (mm). The plots
            in the lower right show the angular deviation (color-coded) and the 3D position in space. The points are color-coded like in the plots showing the deviation
            at the implant base. The black arrow shows the planned position. Values of deviation are given in degrees. Groups: A – MED610, non-sterile; B – MED610,
            sterile; C – PLA/PHA, non-sterile; D – PLA/PHA, sterile.

              Since dental implant placement is an invasive process   to chemical disinfection in terms of reducing the number
            in which the medical device encounters vulnerable tissue,   of microorganisms .
                                                                              [23]
            and the procedure can cause serious infections if the
            device is contaminated  with  pathogens.  Therefore,  the   Marei et al. conducted a study to analyze the effect of
            sterilization of such 3D-printed surgical guides is crucial,   steam heat sterilization on the accuracy of surgical guides
            but  different studies  have  claimed concerns  due  to  the   printed by stereolithography (SLA). The researchers
            thermosensitivity of the material that possibly causes   found no statistically significant changes before and after
            dimensional changes. Steam heat sterilization is superior   steam sterilization as measured by an interactive software


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                         81                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.655
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94