Page 146 - IJB-9-3
P. 146

International Journal of Bioprinting              Bioprinting tissue-engineered bone-periosteum biphasic complex.







































            Figure 3. Characterization of PLLA/HA scaffolds. (A) The images of 3D-printed PLLA/HA scaffolds produced by mixing PLLA (3.2 W and 5.4 W
              molecular weight) and HA (10%, 20%, and 30% mass fraction) (scale bar = 1 mm). (B) Maximal force and elastic modulus of different PLLA/HA scaffolds.
            (C) Proliferation of rabBMSCs on PLLA/HA scaffold. (D) Microstructure and biocompatibility of PLLA/HA scaffold by scanning electron microscope
            (SEM) (scale bar = 1 mm for PLLA/HA; scale bar = 100 μm for PLLA/HA+rabBMSCs). Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05; **P <
            0.01; ***P < 0.001.

            Figure 4A, periosteum phase and bone phase were round   RabPDSCs and rabBMSCs were labeled with DiI (red)
            structures, and the materials between the two layers were   and DiO (green) fluorescent dyes, respectively, and the
            printed vertically. The line spacing of the upper layer   3D structure was constructed. The 2D and 3D fluorescent
            was 1.2 mm, while the line spacing of the lower layer   images could clearly show the hierarchical structure and
            was 1.6 mm. On the right of Figure 4A were the instant   the co-culture bioprinting pattern of the two types of cells
            photographic  images  after  bioprinting. The  cells  were   (Figure 4F).
            spherical and evenly distributed in the hydrogel under
            the light microscope (Figure 4B). Since the crosslinking   3.4. Calvarial bone reconstruction of rabbits
            of GelMA by UV light would affect the cell activity, we   In order to study the osteogenic and repair effect of the
            applied different time durations to crosslink GelMA, and   complex  in vivo, treatment was performed on the skull
            then stained the cells to distinguish living and dead cells.   defect area in the rabbits of the five groups (Figure 5A).
            The fluorescent images showed that the number of dead   Images of µCT scanning showed that relatively complete
            cells grew with the increase of crosslinking time, especially   bone tissue was formed in the defect area of composite
            on the surface of the hydrogel (Figure 4C). GelMA with   implant groups, while the untreated group and the PLLA/
            different crosslinking durations were then cultured in   HA group showed only a little bone tissue growing inward
            the medium. The results showed that the activity of cells   from the edge and mainly confined around the implant.
            in GelMA  with prolonged UV  crosslinking  was lower   The new bone in the defect area was reconstructed and
            than that of short-term UV crosslinking. However, the   quantified, as shown in  Figure 5B, with the improved
            cell  viability in  GelMA after  UV crosslinking of 30  s   complexity of the scaffold, the BV, BV/TV, and Tb. N of
            and 45 s was higher than 75% after 7 days (Figure 4D).   the reconstructed new bone were gradually increased, and
            Furthermore, as shown by the CCK8 experimental results,   the Tb. N in group (V) was significantly different from that
            both of rabPDSCs and rabBMSCs in GelMA continued to   of group (III). There was no significant difference of the
            proliferate within 14 days of culture in vitro (Figure 4E).   Tb. Th among five groups; however, the Tb. Sp decreased


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        138                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.698
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151