Page 324 - IJB-9-3
P. 324

International Journal of Bioprinting                New fibrillar collagen for 3D printing and bioprinting





































            Figure 1. (A and B) CAD designs and dimensions for 3D printing and 3D bioprinting, respectively. (C and D) Real images of the resultant of collagen
            scaffolds after the 3D printing and 3D bioprinting. Once the printing conditions are adjusted, it is possible to obtain 3D scaffolds with adequate resolution
            with both ColA and ColN.

            bioprinting. A cellular density of 2 × 10  cells/mL was used   2.6.3. Cell viability and proliferation
                                           5
            in all the bioinks.                                The viability of the cells (MSC-D1 and L929) within the
                                                               bioprinted scaffolds was determined by Live/Dead
                                                                                                            TM
            2.6.2. 3D bioprinting and culture of cell-laden    Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit (Invitrogen ). Cell-laden
                                                                                                TM
            constructs                                         scaffolds were treated according to manufacturer’s
            A square, CAD grid-like structure of 20 × 20 mm with a 20%   instructions and were observed and captured with an Eclipse
            rectilinear infill (two layers) (Figure 1B) was developed.   TE2000-5  inverted  fluorescence  microscope (Nikon).
            The printing path was optimized through the G-code, and   Manual  z-stacks  were  performed in  all  scaffolds  (15  µm
            loaded into the 3D bioprinter BioX , (Cellink) working on   steps) for both calcein-AM and ethidium homodimer 1.
                                       TM
            sterile conditions. The bioprinting process was performed   The images were subsequently merged by using the
            with a 20-G nozzle (inner diameter 0.61 mm, Cellink) at   microscopy software. This experiment was carried out in
            a linear speed of 5 mm/s. The pneumatic extrusion of the   duplicates for each time point. The percentage of cellular
            bioinks was carried out between 50 kPa (for 2% collagen   viability (%) was determined by counting the amount of
            bioinks) and 70 kPa (for 3% collagen bioink), conditions   living and dead cells in each experiment and calculating
            which were defined in the previous 3D printing experiments.   the amount of living cells in the sample. A minimum of five
            The concentrations were chosen in view of the 3D printing   replicates were used for the calculation of cellular viability.
            and rheology results. The temperature of the cartridge was
            maintained at 20°C by means of a temperature-controlled   Cell proliferation ability was determined using the
            printhead (BioX, Cellink) to reproduce room temperature   Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay after 3D bioprinting.
            working conditions. The printing process was performed   To do so, all the bioprinted scaffolds were incubated
            in sterile, polystyrene petri dishes (Ф 60 mm). Right after   with  10%  CCK-8  solution  at  37°C  for  24  h.  At  the  end
            bioprinting, 3.5 mL of the corresponding culture medium   of each experiment, cellular proliferation was quantified
            (depending on the type of cells laden in each bioink) was   by measuring the O.D. of the CCK-8 solution at 450 nm
            added. The scaffolds were maintained at 37°C, in static   using a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite F200). These
            conditions, inside a cell culture incubator (5% CO  and   experiments were performed in sextuplicates and using
                                                      2
            95% relative humidity) for 12 days.                three collagen non-laden scaffolds as controls. The results



            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        316                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.712
   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329