Page 447 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Gelatin-PVA crosslinked genipin bioinks for skin tissue engineering

Availability of data https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0864

Not applicable. 12. Boyce ST, Lalley AL, 2018, Tissue engineering of skin and
regenerative medicine for wound care. Burns Trauma, 6: 4.
References https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0103-y

1. Wei C, Feng Y, Che D, et al., 2021, Biomaterials in skin tissue 13. Salleh A, Mustafa N, Teow TH, et al., 2022, Dual-layered
engineering. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater, 71: 1–19. approach of ovine collagen-gelatin/cellulose hybrid
https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2021.1933977 biomatrix containing graphene oxide-silver nanoparticles
for cutaneous wound healing : Fabrication, physicochemical,
2. Fadilah NI, Jailani MS, Hisham MA, et al., 2022, Cell cytotoxicity and, antibacterial characterisation. Biomedicines,
secretomes for wound healing and tissue regeneration : 10: 816.
Next generation acellular based tissue engineered products.
J Tissue Eng, 13: 20417314221114273. 14. Zulkiflee I, Fauzi MB, 2021, Gelatin-polyvinyl alcohol film
for tissue engineering: A concise review. Biomedicines,
https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314221114273 9: 979.
3. Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for skin https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9080979
tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives. J Tissue
Eng, 12: 20417314211028574. 15. Roy R, Tiwari M, Donelli G, et al., 2018, Strategies for
combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents
https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314211028574 and their mechanisms of action. Virulence, 9: 522–554.
4. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, et al., 2019, Wound https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2017.1313372
healing: A cellular perspective. Physiol Rev, 99: 665–706.
16. Masri S, Fauzi MB, 2021, Current insight of printability
https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00067.2017 quality improvement strategies in natural-based bioinks
5. Luo R, Dai J, Zhang J, et al., 2021, Accelerated skin wound for skin regeneration and wound healing. Polymers (Basel),
healing by electrical stimulation. Adv Healthc Mater, 13: 1011.
10: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071011
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100557 17. Koch F, Wehrle M, Tröndle K, et al., 2019, Rapid Assessment
6. Zeng R, Lin C, Lin Z, et al., 2018, Approaches to cutaneous of Combined Drop on Demand and Extrusion-based
wound healing: Basics and future directions. Cell Tissue Res, Bioprinting with Controlled Shear Stress and High Shape
374: 217–232. Fidelity. In: 2019 20 International Conference Solid-State
th
Sensors, Actuators Microsystems Eurosensors XXXIII,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2830-1
Transducers 2019 Eurosensors XXXIII. Germany, IEEE.
7. Zawani M, Fauzi MB, 2021, Injectable hydrogels for chronic p1048–1051.
skin wound management: A concise review. Biomedicines, https://doi.org/10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2019.8808595
9: 527.
18. He P, Zhao J, Zhang J, et al., 2018, Bioprinting of skin
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050527
constructs for wound healing. Burns Trauma, 6: 1–10.
8. Kang JI, Park KM, Kang, 2021, Advances in gelatin-based https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-017-0104-x
hydrogels for wound management. J Mater Chem B, 9: 1503–
1520. 19. Ghosh S, Kaushik G, Roy P, et al., 2021, Application of 3D
bioprinting in wound healing: A review. Trends Biomater
https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02582h
Artif Organs, 35: 495–509.
9. Sen CK, 2021, Human wound and its burden: Updated 2020
compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 20. Wang Y, Yuan X, Yao B, et al., 2022, Tailoring bioinks of
10: 281–292. extrusion-based bioprinting for cutaneous wound healing.
Bioact Mater, 17: 178–194.
https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0026
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.024
10. Masri S, Zawani M, Zulkiflee I, et al., 2022, Cellular
interaction of human skin cells towards natural bioink 21. Wang X, Ao Q, Tian X, et al., 2017, Gelatin-based hydrogels
for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers (Basel), 9: 401.
via 3d-bioprinting technologies for chronic wound:
A comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci, 23: 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090401
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010476 22. Young S, Wong ME, Tabata Y, et al., 2005, Gelatin as a
delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive
11. Fuchs C, Pham L, Wang Y, et al., 2021, MagneTEskin-
reconstructing skin by magnetically induced assembly of molecules. J Control Release, 109: 256–274.
autologous microtissue cores. Sci Adv, 7: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.023

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 439 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.677