Page 227 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Simulation-based comparative analysis of nozzles for bioprinting

Figure 9. Comparative images of experimental validation (left) and simulations (right) for the Cone and the Nozzle pneumatic simulations.

4. Conclusion were experimentally verified. Specifically, different inlet
In this work, we proved the feasibility of a standard 0.4 mm properties of these simulations were considered to study
3D printing nozzle for its use in bioprinting applications, pneumatic and piston-driven bioprinting, and the 3D
providing computational fluid dynamics simulations that printing nozzle was compared with a 22G conical tip,

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 219 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.730