Page 325 - IJB-9-4
P. 325

International Journal of Bioprinting                           3D printing in bone regeneration and bone repair



            Table 1. Top 10 most productive countries/regions that contributed publications on three-dimensional printing in bone regeneration
            and bone repair
             Rank    Country/region  Article count  Percentage (%, N/2,025)  Citation  Average citation  H-index
             1       China           817           40.346              19,817     24.26            70
             2       USA             408           20.148              15,162     37.16            61
             3       South Korea     197            9.728               4,893     24.84            39
             4       Germany         118            5.827               3,171     26.87            30
             5       England         117            5.778               3,906     33.38            32
             6       Italy             90           4.444               3,244     36.04            28
             7       Australia         84           4.148               2,364     28.14            24
             8       Spain             70           3.457               1,309     18.70            16
             9       Taiwan            65           3.21               926        14.25            20
             10      Netherlands       64           3.16                2,313     36.14            25

            (39.07). Additionally, an institutional cooperation analysis   The  included  publications  were  also  divided  into  57
            showed that Shanghai Jiao Tong University, the Chinese   research areas. Materials Science (1,171 records, 57.827%
            Academy of Sciences, and Sichuan University were the top   of all articles), Engineering (679, 33.531%), and Chemistry
            3 three institutions involved in collaborations with other   (322, 15.901%) (Table 5) were among the top 10 well-
            institutions (Figure 3B).                          represented research areas. A dual-map overlay of journals
                                                               was used to depict the citation relationship between cited
            3.3. Analysis of journals and research areas       and citing journals (Figure 4B), as seen in a previous
            From 2012 to 2022, a total of 2,025 articles were published   study . The cited journals are on the right, while the
                                                                   [30]
            in 422 journals.  Table 3 shows the top 10 journals with   citing journals are on the left, and they are linked by spline
            the highest number of publications in the research area   waves from left to right, with the citation relationship
            together with their latest IF (SCImago Journal Rank   characterized by colored paths; the primary citation paths
            [SJR], Clarivate Analytics).  Biofabrication produced the   are marked by two pink lines and one orange line. One
            most publications (71 publications, 3.506% of all articles),   of the pink paths indicates that papers published in the
            followed by Materials (67, 3.309%), Acta Biomaterialia (65,   area  of  physics/materials/chemistry  were  primarily  cited
            3.21%), Advanced Healthcare Materials (45, 2.222%), and   by papers in chemistry/materials/physics, while the other
            Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (45, 2.222%).   pink path indicates that papers published in the area of
            Among the top 10 journals, Biomaterials had the highest   physics/materials/chemistry were mainly cited by papers
            IF (15.304), followed by  Advanced Healthcare Materials   in medical/biology/genetics. The orange path shows
            (11.092) and Biofabrication (11.061). A total of 681   that papers published in the area of molecular/biology/
            journals were co-cited more than 20 times by the included   immunology were cited by papers in chemistry/materials/
            publications, among which the top 5 journals with the   physics. The different citing trajectories of cited and citing
            highest total link strength were  Biomaterials (863,355),   journals are better depicted in enlarged figures (Figure 4B).
            Acta Biomaterialia  (510,660),  Biofabrication  (286,502),
            Materials Science Engineering C: Materials for Biological   3.4. Analysis of authors and funding sources
            Applications (273,876), and Journal of Biomedical Materials   Table 6 shows the contribution of the top 10 authors in the
            Research Part A (218,226) (Figure 4A).
                                                               field by their number of publications and citations. Seven
               Table 4  shows the top 10 co-cited journals with   of these top 10 authors were from China, of whom Chen Y
            published articles in this research area, including   and Wu CT both had the highest number of publications
            Biomaterials (108,90 citations), Acta Biomaterialia (5,933),   (39 publications), followed by Zhu YF (30 publications)
            Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials Science and   and Chang J (27 publications) (Figure 5A). Other highly
            Engineering C (3,139), Biofabrication (2,762), and Journal   contributing authors were from the USA and South Korea,
            of Biomedical Materials Research Part A  (2,450).  There   where Lee SJ had 26 publications, and both Lee J and Park
            were also 4 highly co-cited journals, including ACS Applied   SA each had 24  publications.  Among the  top 10 most
            Materials & Interfaces, Tissue Engineering Part A, Advanced   productive authors, Wu  CT  had the  highest  number  of
            Materials, and Scientific Reports, all of which were not from   total citations (2,017 citations), followed by Chang J (1,895
            the top 10 most productive journals.               citations) and Zhu YF (1,613 citations).


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        317                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.737
   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330