Page 414 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Development and characterization of AAMP for hydrogel bioink preparation

static mixing that may not achieve uniform mixing if the Availability of data
solutions are too viscous, AAMP ensures the homogeneity
of the mixing outcome by limitlessly increasing the number Supporting data are available on request. Please contact
of mixing cycles. Its customizable settings can be built upon our research group at peteryanglablist@lists.stanford.edu.
and provides a myriad of possibilities for hydrogel quality References
enhancement. Our results suggest that the AAMP presents
great potential for efficient and standardized preparation 1. Aswathy SH, Narendrakumar U, Manjubala I, 2020,
of hydrogels as well as the field of tissue engineering in Commercial hydrogels for biomedical applications. Heliyon,
general. 6: e03719.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03719
Acknowledgments
2. Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, et al., 2012, A review
This research was partially funded through financial of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for
support from NIH grants U01AR069395, R01AR072613, tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 33: 6020–6041.
and R01AR074458 from NIAMS, and DoD grant https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050
W81XWH-20-1-0343, the Stanford Woods Institute for 3. Khademhosseini A, Langer R, 2007, Microengineered
the Environment, Boswell Foundation, Stanford MCHRI hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 28: 5087–5092.
postdoc fellowship, and Tad and Diane Taube Family
Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.021
4. Zhu J, Marchant RE, 2011, Design properties of hydrogel
Funding tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev Med Devices,
NIH grants U01AR069395, R01AR072613, and 8: 607–626.
R01AR074458 from NIAMS https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.11.27
DoD grant W81XWH-20-1-0343 5. Ji S, Guvendiren M, 2017, Recent advances in bioink design
for 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front Bioeng
The Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment Biotechnol, 5: 23.
Boswell Foundation https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023
Stanford MCHRI postdoc fellowship 6. Jia J, Richards DJ, Pollard S, et al., 2014, Engineering alginate
Tad and Diane Taube Family Foundation. as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomater, 10: 4323–4331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034
Conflict of interest
7. Kesti M, Muller M, Becher J, et al., 2015, A versatile bioink
The authors declare that they have no known competing for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based
financial interests or personal relationships that could have on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta
appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Biomater, 11: 162–172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033
Author contributions
8. Kumar H, Sakthivel K, Mohamed MG, et al., 2021, Designing
Conceptualization: Jiannan Li and Yunzhi Peter Yang gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based bioinks for visible
Investigation: Jiannan Li, Tara Shelby, Hannah Shelby, and light stereolithographic 3D biofabrication. Macromol Biosci,
Hossein Vahid Alizadeh 21: e2000317.
Formal analysis: Jiannan Li, Tara Shelby, and Hossein https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000317
Vahid Alizadeh
Writing – Original draft: Jiannan Li, Tara Shelby, and 9. Li N, Guo R, Zhang ZJ, 2021, Bioink formulations for bone
tissue regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9: 630488.
Yunzhi Peter Yang
Writing – Review and editing: Jiannan Li, Tara Shelby, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.630488
Hossein Alizadeh, and Yunzhi Peter Yang. 10. Naranda J, Bracic M, Vogrin M, et al., 2021, Recent
advancements in 3D printing of polysaccharide hydrogels in
Ethics approval and consent to participate cartilage tissue engineering. Materials (Basel), 14: 3977.
Not applicable. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14143977

Consent for publication 11. Possl A, Hartzke D, Schmidts TM, et al., 2021, A targeted
rheological bioink development guideline and its systematic
Not applicable. correlation with printing behavior. Biofabrication, 13: 035021.

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 406 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.705