Page 416 - IJB-9-4
P. 416

International Journal of Bioprinting        Development and characterization of AAMP for hydrogel bioink preparation


            33.  Hwang DG, Jo Y, Kim M, et al., 2021, A 3D bioprinted hybrid   39.  Van Hoorick J, Tytgat L, Dobos A,  et  al., 2019, (Photo-)
               encapsulation system for delivery of human pluripotent stem   crosslinkable gelatin derivatives for biofabrication
               cell-derived pancreatic islet-like aggregates. Biofabrication,   applications. Acta Biomater, 97: 46–73.
               14: 014101.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.035
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac23ac
                                                               40.  Chen H, Fei F, Li X,  et al., 2021, A structure-supporting,
            34.  Ghasemi A, Akbari E, Imani R, 2021, An overview of   self-healing,  and  high  permeating  hydrogel  bioink
               engineered hydrogel-based biomaterials for improved β-cell   for establishment of diverse homogeneous tissue-like
               survival and insulin secretion.  Front Bioeng Biotechnol,   constructs. Bioact Mater, 6: 3580–3595.
               9: 662084.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.019
               https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.662084
                                                               41.  Marques  CF,  Diogo  GS,  Pina  S,  et al.,  2019,  Collagen-
            35.  Bonani W, Cagol N, Maniglio D, 2020, Alginate hydrogels:   based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications:
               A  tool for 3D cell encapsulation, tissue engineering, and   A comprehensive review. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30: 32.
               biofabrication. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1250: 49–61.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6234-x
               https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3262-7_4
                                                               42.  Rajabi N, Rezaei A, Kharaziha M,  et al., 2021, Recent
            36.  Garcia-Ochoa F, Santos VE, Casas JA, et al., 2000, Xanthan   advances on bioprinted gelatin methacrylate-based
               gum: Production, recovery, and properties. Biotechnol Adv,   hydrogels for tissue repair. Tissue Eng Part A, 27: 679–702.
               18: 549–579.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0350
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-9750(00)00050-1
                                                               43.  Magalhaes LS, Santos FE, de Maria Vaz Elias C,  et al.,
            37.  Riaz  T,  Iqbal  MW,  Jiang  B,  et al.,  2021, A  review of  the   2020, Printing 3D hydrogel structures employing low-cost
               enzymatic, physical, and chemical modification techniques   stereolithography technology. J Funct Biomater, 11: 12.
               of xanthan gum. Int J Biol Macromol, 186: 472–489.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb11010012
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.196
                                                               44.  Acosta-Velez GF, Zhu TZ, Linsley CS,  et al., 2018,
            38.  Wang L, Li W, Qin S, 2021, Three polymers from the sea:   Photocurable poly(ethylene glycol) as a bioink for the
               unique  structures,  directional  modifications,  and  medical   inkjet 3D pharming of hydrophobic drugs.  Int J Pharm,
               applications. Polymers (Basel), 13: 2482.          546: 145–153.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13152482              https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.056






































            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        408                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.705
   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421