Page 473 - IJB-9-4
P. 473

International Journal of Bioprinting                   β-Ti21S auxetic FGPs produced by laser powder bed fusion


            49.  Schmitz A, Horst P, 2014, A finite element unit-cell method      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005
               for homogenised mechanical properties of heterogeneous
               plates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 61: 23–32.   54.  Murchio S, Dallago M, Zanini F,  et al., 2021, Additively
                                                                  manufactured Ti-6Al-4V thin struts via laser powder
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.014  bed  fusion:  Effect  of  building  orientation  on  geometrical
            50.  Alwattar  TA,  Mian  A, 2019,  Development  of  an elastic   accuracy and mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed
               material model for BCC lattice cell structures using finite   Mater, 119: 104495.
               element analysis and neural networks approaches. J Compos      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104495
               Sci, 3: 33.
                                                               55.  Yuan L, Ding S, Wen C, 2019, Additive manufacturing
               https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3020033
                                                                  technology for porous metal implant applications and
            51.  Kim HS, Al-Hassani ST, 2003, Effective elastic constants of   triple minimal surface structures: A review. Bioact Mater,
               two-dimensional cellular materials with deep and thick cell   4: 56–70.
               walls. Int J Mech Sci, 45: 1999–2016.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.002
                                                               56.  Deshpande VS, Ashby MF, Fleck NA, 2001, Foam topology:
            52.  Webb DC, Kormi K, Al-Hassani ST, 1995, Use of FEM in   Bending versus stretching dominated architectures.  Acta
               performance assessment of  perforated plates  subject  to   Mater, 49: 1035–1040.
               general loading conditions. Int J Press Vessel Pip, 64: 137–152.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7
               https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(94)00078-W
                                                               57.  Wang AJ, McDowell DL, 2004, In-plane stiffness and yield
            53.  Yang L, Harrysson O, West H,  et al., 2015, Mechanical   strength of periodic metal honeycombs. J Eng Mater Technol,
               properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures
               realized via additive manufacturing.  Int J Solids Struct,   126: 137–156.
               69–70: 475–490.                                    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1646165















































            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        465                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.728
   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478