Page 472 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting β-Ti21S auxetic FGPs produced by laser powder bed fusion

27. Kolken HM, Zadpoor AA, 2017, Auxetic mechanical 38. De Galarreta SR, Doyle RJ, Jeffers J, et al., Laser powder bed
metamaterials. RSC Adv, 7: 5111–5129. fusion of porous graded structures: A comparison between
https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra27333e computational and experimental analysis. J Mech Behav
Biomed Mater, 123: 104784.
28. Kolken HM, Lietaert K, van der Sloten T, et al., 2020,
Mechanical performance of auxetic meta-biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104784
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 104: 103658. 39. Liu YJ, Wang HL, Li SJ, et al., 2017, Compressive and fatigue
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103658 behavior of beta-type titanium porous structures fabricated
by electron beam melting. Acta Mater, 126: 58–66.
29. Nečemer B, Kramberger J, Vuherer T, et al., 2019, Fatigue
crack initiation and propagation in re-entrant auxetic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.052
cellular structures. Int J Fatigue, 126: 241–247. 40. Luo JP, Huang YJ, Xu JY, et al., 2020, Additively
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.010 manufactured biomedical Ti-Nb-Ta-Zr lattices with tunable
Young’s modulus: Mechanical property, biocompatibility,
30. Mizzi L, Spaggiari A, 2021, Chiralisation of euclidean and proteomics analysis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,
polygonal tessellations for the design of new auxetic 114: 110903.
metamaterials. Mech Mater, 153: 103698.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103698
41. Gordon JV, Narra SP, Cunningham RW, et al., 2020, Defect
31. Yadroitsava I, du Plessis A, Yadroitsev I, 2019, Bone structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive
regeneration on implants of titanium alloys produced manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 36: 101552.
by laser powder bed fusion: A review. In: Titanium for
Consumer Applications Real-world Use Titanium. Elsevier https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2020.101552
Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands. p197–233. 42. Tang M, Pistorius PC, Beuth JL, 2017, Prediction of lack-
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815820-3.00016-2 of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf,
14: 39–48.
32. Shi J, Zhu L, Li L, et al., 2018, A TPMS-based method
for modeling porous scaffolds for bionic bone tissue https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.001
engineering. Sci Rep, 8: 7395.
43. Zhang B, Li Y, Bai Q, 2017, Defect formation mechanisms
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25750-9 in selective laser melting: A review. Chin J Mech Eng,
30: 515–527.
33. Mahmoud D, Elbestawi MA, 2019, Selective laser melting
of porosity graded lattice structures for bone implants. Int J https://doi.org/10.1007/S10033-017-0121-5
Adv Manuf Technol, 100: 2915–2927.
44. Alaña M, Cutolo A, Probst G, et al., 2020, Understanding
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2886-9 elastic anisotropy in diamond based lattice structures
34. Zhao S, Li SJ, Wang SG, et al., 2018, Compressive and produced by laser powder bed fusion: Effect of manufacturing
fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes deviations. Mater Des, 195: 108971.
fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater, 150: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108971
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.060 45. Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P, 1997, A new method for the
35. Surmeneva MA, Surmenev RA, Chudinova EA, et al., 2017, model-independent assessment of thickness in three-
Fabrication of multiple-layered gradient cellular metal dimensional images. J Microsc, 185: 67–75.
scaffold via electron beam melting for segmental bone https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2818.1997.1340694.X
reconstruction. Mater Des, 133: 195–204.
46. ASTM, (n.d.), E407 Standard Practice for Microetching
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.059 Metals and Alloys. United States, Document Center, Inc.
36. Dursun AM, Tüzemen MC, Salamci E, et al., 2022, 47. International Organization for Standardization, (n.d.),
Investigation of compatibility between design and additively ISO 13314:2011-mechanical Testing of Metals-ductility
manufactured parts of functionally graded porous Testing-compression Test for Porous and Cellular Metals.
structures. J Polytech, 25: 1069–1082. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva,
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.891080 Switzerland.
37. Tüzemen MC, Salamcı E, Ünal R, 2022, Investigation of 48. Benedetti M, Klarin J, Johansson F, et al., 2019, Study of the
the relationship between flexural modulus of elasticity and compression behaviour of Ti6Al4V trabecular structures
functionally graded porous structures manufactured by produced by additive laser manufacturing. Materials (Basel),
AM. Mater Today Commun, 31: 103592. 12: 1471.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103592 https://doi.org/10.3390/MA12091471

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 464 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.728