Page 306 - IJB-9-5
P. 306

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Scaffold for engineering enthesis organ



            multiphasic scaffold for enthesis healing has been faced   Table 1. Slicing and printing parameters.
            in two main approaches: (i) the direct use of stem cells   Parameters   Settings           Unit
            (i.e., BM-MSCs), or (ii) the use of differentiated cells
            such as tenocytes, tendon fibroblasts, chondrocytes, and   Infill       50                 %
            osteoblasts (OBs) . The accessibility of MSCs prompts   Layer thickness  0.2               mm
                          [20]
            their choice; however, it requires the development of a   Printing speed  12               mm/s
            scaffold with regional biochemical or mechanical cues to   Printing pattern*  Rectilinear  –
            induce specific lineage differentiation in distinct zones [12,17] .   Extrusion width  0.4  mm
            In this context, this work aims to design and fabricate an   Nozzle diameter  0.4          mm
            innovative multimaterial and multiscale scaffold capable of
            inducing cells into a graded enthesis-like tissue comprising   Nozzle temperature  160     °C
            a T/L region and a bone region. Specific fabrication   Bed temperature  35                 °C
            methods  for different biomaterials were used to obtain   *Each layer is 90 degrees oriented with the previous one.
            the enthesis scaffold. MSCs or pre-committed MSCs
            into tenocytes and osteoblast were combined within the   dissolving  the  polymers  in  chloroform  (Sigma-Aldrich,
            multiphasic scaffold. With the aim to push forward the   St. Louis, Missouri, United States), while PCL (23% w/v)
            T/L engineering, a clinically relevant construct fabricated   was dissolved in acetic acid. Scaffolds were fabricated by
            by braiding three enthesis scaffolds was also presented and   casting the prepared solutions into Petri dishes at room
            characterized.                                     temperature until solvent evaporation to perform the
                                                               biological validation.
            2. Materials and methods                           2.2. Biofabrication of enthesis scaffold
            2.1. Materials                                     This section is divided into three sub-paragraphs to explain
            Extensive screening of commercial, medical-grade,   better the optimization of the fabrication parameters and
            and bioresorbable natural and synthetic polymers was   how the two  different technologies were combined to
            conducted to select the most valuable polymers for T/Ls   fabricate the enthesis scaffold. As a result of the polymer
            and enthesis engineering. The following materials were   screening (see  results  section), the  PCL  and the  PLGA
                                                     [21]
            evaluated: (i) gelatin from porcine skin (Type A)  and   were selected to replicate the bone and T/Ls tissues
                                       [22]
            (ii) gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)  as natural polymers,   characteristics, respectively.
                                     [23]
            (iii) poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) , (iv) PCL, and (v) 75:25   2.2.1. Bone-like region
            PLGA as synthetic polymers . Gelatin (gel strength   The PCL was processed using the FDM technology
                                     [12]
            300, Type A) and PCL (Mn 80,000) were purchased from   to fabricate the scaffold region that would mimic the
            Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, United States). GelMA   characteristics of bone tissue. Pellets of medical-grade
            was produced accordingly to the Chen et al. protocol .   PCL were used to fabricate filaments suitable for FDM
                                                        [24]
            PLLA and PLGA were purchased from Lactel (USA).    applications through the hot melt extrusion (HME)
            Solutions were prepared by a solvent casting technique   technology [27] . For this task, a Felfil Evo extruder (Felfil,
            to fabricate scaffolds suitable for cell culture testing.   Turin, Italy) with an extrusion temperature of 100°C,
            Gelatin solution (10% w/v) was prepared by following the   a screw speed of 4 RPM, and an extrusion die of 1.75
                                 [25]
            protocol of Pulidori et al. . Briefly, the gelatin powder   mm  in  diameter  was  used.  A  water-cooling  element
            was dissolved in a solution of acetic acid (puriss. p.a., ACS   was added to the already implemented air-cooling
            reagent, reag. ISO, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥99.8% from Sigma-  system to rapidly lower the polymer temperature once
            Aldrich) and deionized water (DIW) at a ratio of 9:1   extruded and avoid the molten PCL sticky behavior.
            and stirred at room temperature overnight. After gelatin   The extrusion process was performed at room
            dissolution, the 3-(Glycidyloxypropyl) trimethoxysilane   temperature, T = 25°C, and relative humidity, RH, =
            (GPTMS) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added as a crosslinking   35%. The extruded PCL-based filament (final diameter
            agent. GelMA solution (10% w/v) was prepared following   1.67 ± 0.1 mm) was used to 3D print circular-shaped
                     [26]
            Nichol et al.  protocol by dissolving it in a 1X Phosphate-  woodpile grids for cell culture into a 24-multiwell plate
            Buffered Saline (PBS) solution. Then, 2-Hydroxy-4ʹ-(2-  (diameter Ø = 13 mm and thickness h = 1 mm) and
            hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone  (98% from    was suitable for bone tissue engineering applications [28] .
            Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) (0.5%   Scaffolds were fabricated using a Geeetech A10M 3D
            w/v) was added as a photoinitiator. The GelMA solution   printer from Geeetech® (Shenzhen, China). The slicing
            was then cured under UV-A (365 nm) light for 30 min.   and printing parameters are listed in Table 1.
            Solutions of PLLA and PLGA (10% w/v) were prepared by

            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        298                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.763
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311