Page 480 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printed hydrogel for infected wound healing via PDT

14. Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S, 2002, Hydrogels: From 30. Piluso S, Gomez DF, Dokter I, et al., 2020, Rapid and
controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug cytocompatible cell-laden silk hydrogel formation via
Discov Today, 7: 569–579. riboflavin-mediated crosslinking. J Mater Chem B, 8: 9566–
9575.
15. Augustine R, 2018, Skin bioprinting: A novel approach for
creating artificial skin from synthetic and natural building 31. Lee H, Shin D, Shin S, et al., 2020, Effect of gelatin on
blocks. Prog Biomater, 7: 77–92. dimensional stability of silk fibroin hydrogel structures
fabricated by digital light processing 3D printing. J Ind Eng
16. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al., 2022, Controlling Chem, 89: 119–127.
droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: Key factors to
achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based 32. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, et al., 2014, The 3D
bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 8: 17, 424. printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-
engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials,
17. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou MM, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization- 35: 49–62.
based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and
regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12: 22, 022001. 33. Planas O, Bresolí-Obach R, Nos J, et al., 2015, Synthesis,
photophysical characterization, and photoinduced
18. Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S, et al., 2019, antibacterial activity of methylene blue-loaded amino-
Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging and mannose-targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticles.
technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 6: Molecules, 20: 6284–6298.
30, 011310.
34. Lucky SS, Soo KC, Zhang Y, 2015, Nanoparticles in
19. Chocarro‐Wrona C, de Vicente J, Antich C, et al., 2021, photodynamic therapy. Chem Rev, 115: 1990–2042.
Validation of the 1, 4‐butanediol thermoplastic polyurethane
as a novel material for 3D bioprinting applications. Bioeng 35. Chen QW, Liu XH, Fan JX, et al., 2020, Self‐mineralized
Transl Med, 6: e10192. photothermal bacteria hybridizing with mitochondria‐
targeted metal–organic frameworks for augmenting
20. Vijayavenkataraman S, Lu W, Fuh J, 2016, 3D bioprinting of photothermal tumor therapy. Adv Funct Mater, 30: 1909806.
skin: A state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and
processes. Biofabrication, 8: 032001. 36. Tummers QR, Boonstra MC, Frangioni JV, et al., 2015,
Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging of a
21. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting paraganglioma using methylene blue: A case report. Int J
for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 34: Surg Case Rep, 6: 150–153.
422–434.
37. Wang Z, Hu S, Yang J, et al., 2018, Nanoscale zr‐based MOFs
22. Axpe E, Oyen ML, 2016, Applications of alginate-based with tailorable size and introduced mesopore for protein
bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci, 17: 1976. delivery. Adv Funct Mater, 28: 1707356.
23. Shao Z, Vollrath F, 2002, Surprising strength of silkworm 38. Dhakshinamoorthy A, Navalón S, Asiri AM, et al., 2020,
silk. Nature, 418: 741–741. Gold‐nanoparticle‐decorated metal‐organic frameworks for
24. Müller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, et al., 2015, anticancer therapy. ChemMedChem, 15: 2236–2256.
Nanostructured pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D 39. Gupta V, Mohiyuddin S, Sachdev A, et al., 2019, PEG
bioprinting. Biofabrication, 7: 035006. functionalized zirconium dicarboxylate MOFs for docetaxel
drug delivery in vitro. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 52: 846–855.
25. Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, et al., 2015, A simple and high-
resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system 40. Kaur N, Tiwari P, Kapoor KS, et al., 2020, Metal–organic
using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication, 7: framework based antibiotic release and antimicrobial
045009. response: An overview. CrystEngComm, 22: 7513–7527.
26. Melke J, Midha S, Ghosh S, et al., 2016, Silk fibroin as biomaterial 41. Liu Y, Zhou L, Dong Y, et al., 2021, Recent developments
for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, 31: 1–16. on MOF-based platforms for antibacterial therapy. RSC Med
Chem, 12: 915–928.
27. Kim SH, Kim DY, Lim TH, et al., 2020, Silk fibroin bioinks
for digital light processing (DLP) 3D bioprinting. Bioinspired 42. Lázaro IA, Forgan RS, 2019, Application of zirconium MOFs
Biomater Adv Tissue Eng Regen Med, 1249: 53–66. in drug delivery and biomedicine. Coord Chem Rev, 380:
230–259.
28. Kambe Y, Mizoguchi Y, Kuwahara K, et al., 2020, Beta-sheet
content significantly correlates with the biodegradation time 43. Ding Q, Xu Z, Zhou L, et al., 2022, A multimodal metal-
of silk fibroin hydrogels showing a wide range of compressive organic framework based on unsaturated metal site
modulus. Polym Degrad Stab, 179: 109240. for enhancing antitumor cytotoxicity through chemo-
photodynamic therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci, 621: 180–194.
29. Zheng A, Wang X, Xin X, et al., 2023, Promoting lacunar
bone regeneration with an injectable hydrogel adaptive to 44. Zhang XY, Kang XN, Jin LJ, et al., 2018, Stimulation of
the microenvironment. Bioact Mater, 21: 403–421. wound healing using bioinspired hydrogels with basic

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 472 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.773