Page 516 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Implantation of composites for cartilage repair

21. Galarraga JH, Locke RC, Witherel CE, et al., 2022, 31. Erickson IE, Kestle SR, Zellars KH, et al., 2012, Improved
Fabrication of MSC-laden composites of hyaluronic acid cartilage repair via in vitro pre-maturation of MSC-seeded
hydrogels reinforced with MEW scaffolds for cartilage hyaluronic acid hydrogels. Biomed Mater, 7(2): 024110.
repair. Biofabrication, 14(1): 014106.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/2/024110
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac3acb
32. Mainil-Varlet P, Van Damme B, Nesic D, et al., 2010, A new
22. Castilho M, Hochleitner G, Wilson W, et al., 2018, Mechanical histology scoring system for the assessment of the quality
behavior of a soft hydrogel reinforced with three-dimensional of human cartilage repair: ICRS II. Am J Sports Med, 38(5):
printed microfibre scaffolds. Sci Rep, 8(1): 1245. 880–890.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19502-y https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509359068
23. Galarraga JH, Kwon MY, Burdick JA, 2019, 3D bioprinting 33. Stoeckl BD, Zlotnick HM, Farrell MJ, et al., 2021, The
via an in situ crosslinking technique towards engineering porcine accessory carpal bone as a model for biologic joint
cartilage tissue. Sci Rep, 9(1): 19987. replacement for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Acta
Biomater, 129: 159–168.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56117-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.05.011
24. Kim M, Erickson IE, Choudhury M, et al., 2012, Transient
exposure to TGF-β3 improves the functional chondrogenesis 34. Patel JM, Wise BC, Bonnevie ED, et al., 2019, A systematic
of MSC-laden hyaluronic acid hydrogels. J Mech Behav review and guide to mechanical testing for articular cartilage
Biomed Mater, 11: 92–101. tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 25(10): 593–608.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.006 https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0116
25. Kwon MY, Vega SL, Gramlich WM, et al., 2018, Dose and 35. Moore AC, DeLucca JF, Elliott DM, et al., 2016, Quantifying
timing of N-cadherin mimetic peptides regulate MSC cartilage contact modulus, tension modulus, and permeability
chondrogenesis within hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater, 7(9): with hertzian biphasic creep. J Tribol, 138(4): 1–7.
1701199. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032917
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701199 36. Fisher MB, Belkin NS, Milby AH, et al., 2016, Effects of
mesenchymal stem cell and growth factor delivery on cartilage
26. Zlotnick HM, Locke RC, Stoeckl BD, et al., 2021, Marked
differences in local bone remodelling in response to different repair in a mini-pig model. Cartilage, 7(2): 174–184.
marrow stimulation techniques in a large animal. Eur Cell https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603515623030
Mater, 41: 546–557.
37. Galarraga JH, Dhand AP, Enzmann BP, et al., 2023,
https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v041a35 Synthesis, characterization, and digital light processing
of a hydrolytically degradable hyaluronic acid hydrogel.
27. Fisher MB, Belkin NS, Milby AH, et al., 2015, Cartilage Biomacromolecules, 24(1): 413–425.
repair and subchondral bone remodeling in response to
focal lesions in a mini-pig model: Implications for tissue https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01218
engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 21(3–4): 850–860. 38. Qayed M, Copland I, Galipeau J, 2017, Allogeneic Versus
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0384 Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Donor-To-Donor
Variability. Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam.
28. Collins D, Simons B, 2020, Significantly delayed polyglactin
910 suture-related pseudoinfection in a yucatan pig. BMC https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802826-1.00004-0
Vet Res, 16(1): 1–7. 39. Pfeifer CG, Fisher MB, Saxena V, et al., 2017, Age-dependent
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02662-3 subchondral bone remodeling and cartilage repair in a
minipig defect model. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 23(11):
29. Smith G, Taylor J, Almqvist KF, et al., 2005, Arthroscopic 745–753.
assessment of cartilage repair: A validation study of 2
scoring systems. Arthroscopy, 21(12): 1462–1467. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0109
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.007 40. Brittberg M, Winalski CS, 2003, Evaluation of cartilage
injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Series A, 85(2): 58–69.
30. Goebel L, Orth P, Müller A, et al., 2012, Experimental
scoring systems for macroscopic articular cartilage repair https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200300002-00008
correlate with the MOCART score assessed by a high-field 41. Mithoefer K, Mcadams T, Williams RJ, et al., 2009, Clinical
MRI at 9.4 T - comparative evaluation of five macroscopic efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage
scoring systems in a large animal cartilage defect model. repair in the knee: An evidence-based systematic analysis.
Osteoarthr Cartil, 20(9): 1046–1055. Am J Sports Med, 37(10): 2053–2063.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.05.010 https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508328414

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 508 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.775