Page 100 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Review of 3D bioprinted organoids

40. Yu K-F, Lu T-Y, Li Y-CE, et al., 2022, Design and synthesis of 51. Gong Z, Huang L, Tang X, et al., 2021, Acoustic droplet
stem cell-laden keratin/glycol chitosan methacrylate bioinks printing tumor organoids for modeling bladder tumor
for 3D bioprinting. Biomacromolecules, 23(7): 2814–2826. immune microenvironment within a week. Adv Healthc
Mater, 10(22): 2101312.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00191
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202101312
41. Alcala-Orozco CR, Mutreja I, Cui X, et al., 2020, Design
and characterisation of multi-functional strontium-gelatin 52. Adine C, Ng KK, Rungarunlert S, et al., 2018, Engineering
nanocomposite bioinks with improved print fidelity and innervated secretory epithelial organoids by magnetic three-
osteogenic capacity. Bioprinting, 18: e00073. dimensional bioprinting for stimulating epithelial growth in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00073 salivary glands. Biomaterials, 180: 52–66.
42. Rousselle A, Ferrandon A, Mathieu E, et al., 2022, Enhancing https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.011
cell survival in 3D printing of organoids using innovative 53. Pati F, Jang J, Lee JW, et al., 2015, Extrusion bioprinting, in
bioinks loaded with pre-cellularized porous microscaffolds. Essentials of 3D Biofabrication and Translation, Academic
Bioprinting, 28: e00247. Press, Boston, 123–152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00247 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800972-7.00007-4
43. Cofiño C, Perez‐Amodio S, Semino CE, et al., 2019, 54. Shinkar K, Rhode K, 2022, Could 3D extrusion bioprinting
Development of a self‐assembled peptide/methylcellulose‐ serve to be a real alternative to organ transplantation in the
based bioink for 3D bioprinting. Macromol Mater Eng, future? Ann 3D Print Med, 7: 100066.
304(11): 1900353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100066
https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201900353
55. Lim W, Kim GJ, Kim HW, et al., 2020, Kappa-Carrageenan-
44. Alhattab D, Khan Z, Alshehri S, et al., 2023, 3D bioprinting based dual crosslinkable bioink for extrusion type
of ultrashort self-assembling peptides to engineer scaffolds bioprinting. Polymers, 12(10): 2377.
with different matrix stiffness for chondrogenesis.
Int J Bioprint, 9(4): 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102377
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.719 56. Moxon SR, Cooke ME, Cox SC, et al., 2017, Suspended
manufacture of biological structures. Adv Mater, 29(13):
45. Jeong W, Kim MK, Kang H-W, 2021, Effect of detergent 1605594.
type on the performance of liver decellularized extracellular
matrix-based bio-inks. J Tissue Eng, 12: 2041731421997091. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605594
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731421997091 57. Cooke ME, Rosenzweig DH, 2021, The rheology of direct and
suspended extrusion bioprinting. APL Bioeng, 5(1): 011502.
46. Panwar A, Tan L, 2016, Current status of bioinks for micro-
extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules, 21(6): 685. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0031475
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060685 58. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019, 3D bioprinting
of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart.
47. Xu Z, Huang J, Liu Y, et al., 2023, Extracellular matrix bioink
boosts stemness and facilitates transplantation of intestinal Science, 365(6452): 482–487.
organoids as a biosafe Matrigel alternative. Bioeng Transl Med, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9051
8(1): e10327.
59. McCormack A, Highley CB, Leslie NR, et al., 2020, 3D
https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10327 printing in suspension baths: Keeping the promises of
48. Zhang X, Liu Y, Luo C, et al., 2021, Crosslinker-free silk/ bioprinting afloat. Trends Biotechnol, 38(6): 584–593.
decellularized extracellular matrix porous bioink for 3D https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.020
bioprinting-based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci
Eng C, 118: 111388. 60. Yeo M, Ha J, Lee H, et al., 2016, Fabrication of hASCs-laden
structures using extrusion-based cell printing supplemented
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111388 with an electric field. Acta Biomater, 38: 33–43.
49. He Y, Gu Z, Xie M, et al., 2020, Why choose 3D bioprinting? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.017
Part II: Methods and bioprinters. Bio-Des Manuf, 3(1): 1–4.
61. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A comprehensive
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00064-w review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and
50. Chen J, Zhou D, Nie Z, et al., 2022, A scalable coaxial future. Biomaterials, 102: 20–42.
bioprinting technology for mesenchymal stem cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
microfiber fabrication and high extracellular vesicle yield.
Biofabrication, 14(1): 015012. 62. Saunders RE, Derby B, 2014, Inkjet printing biomaterials for
tissue engineering: Bioprinting. Int Mater Rev, 59(8): 430–448.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac3b90

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 92 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0112