Page 242 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting in diabetic foot disease

full-thickness wound healing. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 28(1): 48. Elkhoury K, Chen M, Koçak P, et al., 2022, Hybrid
160–181. extracellular vesicles-liposome incorporated advanced
bioink to deliver microRNA. Biofabrication, 14(4).
35. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al., 2018, Bioinks
for 3D bioprinting: An overview. Biomater Sci, 6(5): 915–946. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac8621.
36. Wang H, Yu H, Zhou X, et al., 2022, An overview of 49. Abaci A, Guvendiren M, 2020, Designing decellularized
extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Front extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Adv
Bioeng Biotechnol, 10(2022): 905438. Healthc Mater, 9(24): e2000734.
37. Tao G, Wang Y, Cai R, et al., 2019, Design and performance 50. Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, et al., 2018, Organ-derived
of sericin/poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as a drug delivery decellularized extracellular matrix: A game changer for
carrier for potential wound dressing application. Mater Sci bioink manufacturing? Trends Biotechnol, 36(8): 787–805.
Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 101(2019): 341–351.
51. Chen J, Zhou D, Nie Z, et al., 2021, A scalable coaxial bioprinting
38. Chen CS, Zeng F, Xiao X, et al., 2018, Three-dimensionally technology for mesenchymal stem cell microfiber fabrication
printed silk-sericin-based hydrogel scaffold: A promising and high extracellular vesicle yield. Biofabrication, 14(1).
visualized dressing material for real-time monitoring 52. Wu J, Piao Y, Liu Q, et al., 2021, Platelet-rich plasma-derived
of wounds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10(40): extracellular vesicles: A superior alternative in regenerative
33879–33890.
medicine? Cell Prolif, 54(12): e13123.
39. Gonzalez-Fernandez T, Tenorio AJ, Campbell KT, et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13123. Epub 2021 Oct 5. PMID:
2021, Alginate-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting and 34609779; PMCID: PMC8666280.
fabrication of anatomically accurate bone grafts. Tissue Eng
Part A, 27(17–18): 1168–1181. 53. Cui H, Zhu W, Holmes B, et al., 2016, Biologically inspired
smart release system based on 3D bioprinted perfused
40. Lee SC, Gillispie G, Prim P, et al., 2020, Physical and
chemical factors influencing the printability of hydrogel- scaffold for vascularized tissue regeneration. Adv Sci
(Weinh), 3(8): 1600058.
based extrusion bioinks. Chem Rev, 120(19): 10834–10886.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600058. PMID: 27818910;
41. Jin SG, 2022, Production and application of biomaterials PMCID: PMC5074245.
based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as wound dressing. Chem
Asian J, 17(21): e202200595. 54. Zhao W, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al., 2022, Adaptive multi-
degree-of-freedom in situ bioprinting robot for hair-follicle-
42. Baltazar T, Merola J, Catarino C, et al., 2020, Three inclusive skin repair: A preliminary study conducted in
dimensional bioprinting of a vascularized and perfusable mice. Bioeng Transl Med, 7(3): e10303.
skin graft using human keratinocytes, fibroblasts, pericytes,
and endothelial cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 26(5–6): 227–238. 55. Jorgensen AM, Varkey M, Gorkun A, et al., 2020, Bioprinted
skin recapitulates normal collagen remodeling in full-
43. Pontiggia L, Van Hengel IA, Klar A, et al., 2022, Bioprinting thickness wounds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26(9–10): 512–526.
and plastic compression of large pigmented and
vascularized human dermo-epidermal skin substitutes by https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0319. Epub 2020 Jan
means of a new robotic platform. J Tissue Eng, 13(2022): 28. PMID: 31861970; PMCID: PMC7249461.
20417314221088513. 56. Maver T, Mohan T, Gradišnik L, et al., 2019, Polysaccharide
44. Skylar-Scott MA, Huang JY, Lu A, et al., 2022, Orthogonally thin solid films for analgesic drug delivery and growth of
induced differentiation of stem cells for the programmatic human skin cells. Front Chem, 7: 217.
patterning of vascularized organoids and bioprinted tissues. 57. Jahanshahi M, Hamdi D, Godau B, et al., 2020, An engineered
Nat Biomed Eng, 6(4): 449–462. infected epidermis model for in vitro study of the skin’s pro-
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00856-8. Epub 2022 inflammatory response. Micromachines (Basel), 11(2): 227.
Mar 24. PMID: 35332307; PMCID: PMC9506705. 58. Cui C, Kim DO, Pack MY, et al., 2020, 4D printing of
45. Abaci HE, Guo Z, Coffman A, et al., 2016, Human skin self-folding and cell-encapsulating 3D microstructures as
constructs with spatially controlled vasculature using scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications. Biofabrication,
primary and iPSC-derived endothelial cells. Adv Healthc 12(4): 045018.
Mater, 5(14): 1800–1807. 59. Spoerk M, Arbeiter F, Raguž I, et al., 2019, Mechanical
46. Tasoglu S, Demirci U, 2013, Bioprinting for stem cell recyclability of polypropylene composites produced by
research. Trends Biotechnol, 31(1): 10–19. material extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Polymers
(Basel), 11(8): 1318.
47. Ker ED, Nain AS, Weiss LE, et al., 2011, Bioprinting of
growth factors onto aligned sub-micron fibrous scaffolds for 60. Xu HQ, Liu JC, Zhang ZY, et al., 2022, A review on cell
simultaneous control of cell differentiation and alignment. damage, viability, and functionality during 3D bioprinting.
Biomaterials, 32(32): 8097–8107. Mil Med Res, 9(1): 70.

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 234 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0142