Page 244 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting in diabetic foot disease

90. Li Y, Xu T, Tu Z, et al., 2020, Bioactive antibacterial silica- cellular density and embedded vascular channels. Sci Adv,
based nanocomposites hydrogel scaffolds with high 5(9): eaaw2459.
angiogenesis for promoting diabetic wound healing and
skin repair. Theranostics, 10(11): 4929–4943. 104. Wu SD, Dai NT, Liao CY, et al., 2022, Planar-/curvilinear-
bioprinted tri-cell-laden hydrogel for healing irregular
91. Prasad YS, Miryala S, Lalitha K, et al., 2020, An injectable chronic wounds. Adv Healthc Mater, 11(16): e2201021.
self-healing anesthetic glycolipid-based oleogel with 105. Pagan E, Stefanek E, Seyfoori A, et al., 2023, A handheld
antibiofilm and diabetic wound skin repair properties. Sci bioprinter for multi-material printing of complex constructs.
Rep, 10(1): 18017.
Biofabrication, 15(3): 035012.
92. Xia S, Weng T, Jin R, et al., 2022, Curcumin-incorporated 3D
bioprinting gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel reduces reactive 106. Altunbek M, Afghah F, Caliskan OS, et al., 2023, Design and
oxygen species-induced adipose-derived stem cell apoptosis bioprinting for tissue interfaces. Biofabrication, 15(2).
and improves implanting survival in diabetic wounds. Burns 107. Monteiro-Soares M, Russell D, Boyko EJ, et al., 2020,
Trauma, 10(2022): tkac001. Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers
(IWGDF 2019). Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 36(Suppl 1): e3273.
93. Ullah F, Javed F, Mushtaq I, et al., 2023, Development of
highly-reproducible hydrogel based bioink for regeneration 108. Huang SM, Wu CS, Chiu MH, et al., 2019, High glucose
of skin-tissues via 3-D bioprinting technology. Int J Biol environment induces M1 macrophage polarization that
Macromol, 230: 123131. impairs keratinocyte migration via TNF-α: An important
mechanism to delay the diabetic wound healing. J Dermatol
94. Ma J, Qin C, Wu J, et al., 2021, 3D printing of strontium Sci, 96(3): 159–167.
silicate microcylinder-containing multicellular biomaterial
inks for vascularized skin regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater, 109. Tian F, Jiang Y, Liu Y, et al., 2021, Can fractal dimension
10(16): e2100523. analysis be used in quantitating collagen structure? Exp
Dermatol, 30(12): 1825–1828.
95. Wang X, Yang C, Yu Y, et al., 2022, In situ 3D bioprinting
living photosynthetic scaffolds for autotrophic wound 110. Xu H, Zhang J, Jiang Y, et al., 2022, Fractal analysis of rat
healing. Research (Wash D C), 2022(2022): 9794745. dermal tissue in the different injury states. Int Wound J,
19(5): 1016–1022.
96. Guan G, Qizhuang Lv, Liu S, et al., 2021, 3D-bioprinted
peptide coupling patches for wound healing. Mater Today 111. Pena G, Kuang B, Szpak Z, et al., 2020, Evaluation of a
Bio, 13(2021): 100188. novel three-dimensional wound measurement device for
assessment of diabetic foot ulcers. Adv Wound Care (New
97. Liao W, Duan X, Xie F, et al., 2023, 3D-bioprinted double- Rochelle), 9(11): 623–631.
crosslinked angiogenic alginate/chondroitin sulfate patch
for diabetic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol, 236(2023): 112. Parsa S, Wamsley C, Kim P, et al., 2022, Use of optical
123952. coherence tomography (OCT) in assessment of diabetic
skin wound characteristics and blood flow. J Foot Ankle Surg,
98. Jo Y, Hwang DG, Kim M, et al., 2023, Bioprinting-assisted 62(3): 407–412.
tissue assembly to generate organ substitutes at scale. Trends
Biotechnol, 41(1): 93–105. 113. Li C, Chen J, Jie T, et al., 2022, Construction of biomimetic
tissues with anisotropic structures via stepwise algorithm-
99. Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, et al., In situ bioprinting assisted bioprinting. Small, 18(46): e2204316.
of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of
extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci Rep, 9(1): 114. Li C, Chen J, Jie T, et al., 2022, Construction of biomimetic
1856. tissues with anisotropic structures via stepwise algorithm-
assisted bioprinting. Small, 18(46): e2204316.
100. Wu Y, Fortunato GM, Okesola BO, et al., 2021, An interfacial
self-assembling bioink for the manufacturing of capillary- 115. Gholami P, Ahmadi-Pajouh MA, Abolftahi N, et al.,
like structures with tuneable and anisotropic permeability. 2018, Segmentation and measurement of chronic wounds
Biofabrication, 13(3). for bioprinting. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 22(4):
1269–1277.
101. Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016, Direct 3D
bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend 116. Zahia S, Garcia-Zapirain B, Elmaghraby A, 2020, Integrating
bioink. Biomaterials, 106(2016): 58–68. 3D model representation for an accurate non-invasive
assessment of pressure injuries with deep learning. Sensors
102. Fang Y, Guo Y, Wu B, et al., 2023, Expanding embedded 3D (Basel), 20(10): 2933.
bioprinting capability for engineering complex organs with
freeform vascular networks. Adv Mater, 35(22): e2205082. 117. Zhao R, Tang H, Xu C, et al., 2021, Automatic quantitative
analysis of structure parameters in the growth cycle of
103. Skylar-Scott MA, Uzel SGM, Nam LL, et al., 2019, artificial skin using optical coherence tomography. J Biomed
Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high Opt, 26(9): 095001.

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 236 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0142